X-Caveman
Gold $$ Contributor
Just a thought on the box test target - surely the "20 MOA at 200 yds" should read "5 MOA at 200 yds"
Thanks for pointing out my error. It should read 20MOA @ 50 YDS! Of course, you are correct, too...
Just a thought on the box test target - surely the "20 MOA at 200 yds" should read "5 MOA at 200 yds"
I admire your intent and wish you good luck with your endeavor.
In the mean time could you please advise us as to the weights of the uppers and lowers as shipped. Please also add this to the specs for each on your website.
I admire your intent and wish you good luck with your endeavor.
In the mean time could you please advise us as to the weights of the uppers and lowers as shipped. Please also add this to the specs for each on your website.
Thanks for the weights. Now I know that the scope checker we were using to test some scopes for POA holding was yours. I'm busy today but will post the results and comments tomorrow. I think I'll start a new thread as our results are a little off topic for this thread.
Bart,Yes, and the Leupold and Nightforce I checked.
Another test is to check for range focus errors. One Nightforce I tested on a 200 yard target needed to be set at infinity to remove parallax effects. Had to look into them using a 7X monocular to magnify the target image and reticle.
I've no idea. Haven't bought one since the '80's.Bart,
IYO, what is the best scope on the market that is not likely to not need any work done to it when new out of the box.
Ben