• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

San Jose becomes 1st in US to require gun liability insurance

wedgy

Gold $$ Contributor

SAN JOSE, Calif. -- Gun owners will soon be required to carry liability insurance and pay a fee in the city of San Jose that officials say would be the first of its kind in the United States, following a trend of other Democratic-led cities that have sought to rein in violence through stricter rules.

The City Council voted on the plan Tuesday, but it is unclear exactly when it goes into effect.

After the vote, San Jose Mayor Sam Liccardo released a statement, saying in part, "Thank you to my council colleagues who continue to show their commitment to reducing gun violence and its devastation in our community."

The Firearm Policy Coalition says it will fight the new law, calling it "burdensome, unconstitutional, and prohibited by California law" to law-abiding, firearm-owning citizens.

"Since San Jose's recalcitrant City Council members don't believe that the United States Constitution applies to them or their citizens, Firearms Policy Coalition and our members are now committed to fight the City's outrageous and offensive policies in federal litigation and take every possible action to block their enforcement," the group said.

"San Jose has an opportunity to become a model for the rest of the nation to invest in proven strategies to reduce gun violence, domestic violence and suicide and the many other preventable harms from firearms in our communities," San Jose Mayor Sam Liccardo said at a news conference Monday.

Other similar laws have been proposed but San Jose would be the first city in the country to pass one, according to Brady United, a national nonprofit that advocates against gun violence.


The now-passed ordinance is part of a broad gun control plan that Liccardo announced following the May 26 mass shooting at the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority rail yard that left nine people dead, including the employee who opened fire on his colleagues then killed himself.

Having liability insurance would encourage people in the 5,500 households in San Jose who legally own at least one registered gun to have gun safes, install trigger locks and take gun safety classes, Liccardo said.

The liability insurance will cover losses or damages resulting from any negligent or accidental use of the firearm, including death, injury, or property damage, according to the ordinance. If a gun is stolen or lost, the owner of the firearm would be considered liable until the theft or loss is reported to authorities.

The requirement won't apply to current and retired law enforcement officers or those with a license to carry concealed weapons.


The $25 fee will be collected by a yet-to-be-named nonprofit to be used for firearm safety education and training, suicide prevention, domestic violence, and mental health services.

Those who don't insure their weapons will face unspecified fines.

Sam Paredes, executive director of Gun Owners of California, said before the official vote that his group will sue if the proposal takes effect, calling it "totally unconstitutional in any configuration."

"We have freedom of religion, you can't tax religion. We have freedom of association, we can gather together and we can't be taxed," he said. "The same is true with the Second Amendment. You can't put preconditions on it."

Liccardo said gun violence costs San Jose taxpayers $40 million a year in emergency response services.


"The Second Amendment protects every citizen's right to own and possess a gun. It does not mandate that taxpayers subsidize that right," Liccardo said. He said some attorneys have already offered to defend the city pro bono.

However the proposal does not address the massive problem of illegally obtained weapons that are stolen or purchased without background checks.

An increasing number of violent crimes nationwide are also being attributed to "ghost guns," the untraceable firearms made from build-it-yourself kits that can be assembled in minutes.

In 2019, ghost guns were associated with a fraction of gun-related deaths in San Francisco but the following year, nearly 50% of guns recovered in homicide cases were ghost guns, San Francisco District Attorney Chesa Boudin said. In Los Angeles, the police department said the number of ghost guns it seized had increased by about 400% since 2017.

The San Jose Police Department could not say how many of the more than 200 gunfire deaths and injuries annually involved firearms obtained illegally.
 
View attachment 1311407

There are several hundred things that need to be said about Commiefornia but the anger turns it into an incoherent stream of curse words. So here is a picture that sums up circa 15% of my thoughts.
The only thing missing from your picture is the fact that, that state did not sink in the Pacific Ocean. Hopefully law abiding gun owners jumped off before it floated out the sea to its demise. Absolutely f$$$ing disgusting!!!!!!!
 
From the article: "Having liability insurance would encourage people in the 5,500 households in San Jose who legally own at least one registered gun to have gun safes"

This is why you need to fight registration at the state level with all of your being.
Honestly, if I was one of those 5500 households, I would be moving out as fast as possible. The loss of 5500 households worth of tax base might change their thinking.
 
Exclusions in all liability insurance policies do not cover 1) criminal acts (this would be against social policy) and 2) intentional acts of violence. So, how is this going to help? If you have a standard ISO homeowner policy with personal liability you have coverage for unintentional acts with a firearm. I wonder how insurance companies are going to underwrite HO coverage in San Hose now? One immediate thought is they will ask if you have firearms and then not insure you. If you lie, they can deny coverage under misrepresentation. Catch 22 all around.
 
Per the article there’s 5500 registered owners with at least one gun in the home. The article states below that that gun violence costs the city of San Jose 40 million a year in emergency response services.

man us honest law abiding gun owners sure are drain on society.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
166,331
Messages
2,216,451
Members
79,555
Latest member
GerSteve
Back
Top