I did this and found that using a mandrel to expand the neck to accept the bullet helps to reduce the induced runout that is caused by pulling an expander ball back up out of the neck. It is an extra step but I just load for factory bolt guns, with a single stage press, in small quantities, so I have the time. I'm not sure how much it helps on paper, but it sure makes me feel better knowing what is happening, err, or should I say, not happening???!Here is an experiment for any of you to try. For a caliber that you have a factory rifle and a one piece FL die, size a fired case with the decapping assembly removed and measure its runout. Let us know what your results are.
So, before you use the mandrel, after the cases are sized, what does their runout look like?I did this and found that using a mandrel to expand the neck to accept the bullet helps to reduce the induced runout that is caused by pulling an expander ball back up out of the neck. It is an extra step but I just load for factory bolt guns, with a single stage press, in small quantities, so I have the time. I'm not sure how much it helps on paper, but it sure makes me feel better knowing what is happening, err, or should I say, not happening???!
I have a Sinclair tool and it seems to be less than .002 consistently. Sometimes nill. I use a L.E.Wilson neck reamer on my 1x fired brass and I think that helps take out "high spots" off the inside of the necks, which contributes to more uniform neck tension.So, before you use the mandrel, after the cases are sized, what does their runout look like?
I feel Im a fortunate guy now and if Im still shooting at 85, I will feel really fortunate. More power to you Nick.Every time I read posts on subjects like this I feel stupid. The opinions do nothing but confuse me. Granted I have never shot at more than 300 yards and mostly shoot at 100 yards due to not having a range near me for longer shooting.
Most of my rifles want to be seated close to the lands. When the bullet leaves the case even if it is not tightly seated in the lands, it travels under great pressure through 20 to 28 inches of barrel. It seems to me that a really good barrel and chamber will take care of most everything else. If you are shooting five shot groups and they are between .200 and .250 how much better can the average Joe shoot? I am no stranger to 5 shot one hole groups in the ones either.
My priorities are placed on the quality of the chamber, concentricity of the brass and of course the entire barrel. While I have checked some loaded rounds for runout, I have never done so extensively.
While I don't shoot competitively, it seems I am king of the hill with the five guys I shoot with every week. My targets are always praised by them. I think we sometimes we over complicate things.
I am sure that most of you will read this post and cringe. Do not fear telling me I am all wrong. At 85 years old, I am too ignorant to be insulted.
Nick is correct, a really good chamber is the key.Every time I read posts on subjects like this I feel stupid. The opinions do nothing but confuse me. Granted I have never shot at more than 300 yards and mostly shoot at 100 yards due to not having a range near me for longer shooting.
Most of my rifles want to be seated close to the lands. When the bullet leaves the case even if it is not tightly seated in the lands, it travels under great pressure through 20 to 28 inches of barrel. It seems to me that a really good barrel and chamber will take care of most everything else. If you are shooting five shot groups and they are between .200 and .250 how much better can the average Joe shoot? I am no stranger to 5 shot one hole groups in the ones either.
My priorities are placed on the quality of the chamber, concentricity of the brass and of course the entire barrel. While I have checked some loaded rounds for runout, I have never done so extensively.
While I don't shoot competitively, it seems I am king of the hill with the five guys I shoot with every week. My targets are always praised by them. I think we sometimes we over complicate things.
I am sure that most of you will read this post and cringe. Do not fear telling me I am all wrong. At 85 years old, I am too ignorant to be insulted.
PTNick is correct, a really good chamber is the key.
Guys that don't have a really good chamber cannot get away with latitude afforded to those that do.
I have 2 barrels for my 223 for example... Both have a free bore of 0.190", long for a 223.
One barrel has a freebore diameter of 0.2259", the other 0.2246"
The 0.2246" freebore diameter barrel could not shoot a bad group if I put the bullets in backwards
The 0.2259" freebore diameter barrel has me chasing ghosts constantly. Once in a while it prints a 0.375" group and I think there's hope for it. 5 minutes later it's 0.600". Some guys would be happy with that, but I'm not one of those guys. The 0.2246" freebore diameter barrel shoots 0.375" on a bad group.
I'm left to wonder how many of you guys have actually measured your actual throat diameter, not off the reamer... actually took a chamber cast and measured it.
How does a guy obtain a barrel with a bonafide 0.2246" diameter freebore? That's the real problem. Reamer guys cant comit to the tolerance, and the pipe fitter probably has more slop in his spindle than it takes to repeat that. Personally, I have special tricks.