Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
JRS said:The ring spacing changes the distance between the barrel and objective. The rail is flat, but tapers towards the barrel. As you move the front ring towards the end of the rail, the distance between the barrel and objective decreases. Moving the front ring towards the rear ring increases that distance, because you are raising the height of the ring as you move towards the higher portion of the base. Measuring my Kelbly F-Class action, the 20 MOA rail consists of 14 slots. Each slot represents roughly 1.5 MOA. Working from rear to front, the rear is zero. Moving forward, each slot increases by roughly 1.5 MOA. The last slot in the rail represents 20 MOA.OleFreak said:JRS said:To take advantage of the 20 MOA slope, the rings will have to be spaced to a location that gives you a true 20 MOA. It's possible, the rings are too close together.
His rings from base to center are the same height and they are positioning what amounts to a straight cylindrical tube. The rings are mounted to a rail that’s flat over its full length topside but it’s an inclined rail higher at the rear relative to the barrel’s bore center in how the rail is mounted to the receiver. So, what’s ring spacing got to do with anything in this case?
BigBlueandGoldie said:JRS said:To take advantage of the 20 MOA slope, the rings will have to be spaced to a location that gives you a true 20 MOA. It's possible, the rings are too close together.
When you're done checking this, go out to your car and check your muffler bearings and your blinker fluid.
JRS said:Looking at the number of PM's I received, I had more than one believing it ;D