Recently, I took considerable time and care in sorting Lapua Long Range by both headspace (.040-.042 in one lot and .043-.044 in the other) and by weight (within .1 grain) for my Vudoo. I had chrono data for the same lot but unsorted and wanted to see if there was enough difference to make it worthwhile.
For that days shooting I fire sighter rounds from the .040-.042 group that were not weight sorted. For record rounds I fired the ammo sorted by weight and headspace. In the end, looking at all 100 rounds fired that day, the total number of rounds was the same and so were the overall velocity, ES and SD readings. I then broke out the sighters from the record rounds and got a surprise. ES and SD were actually HIGHER for the headspace & weight sorted ammo than in the sighters that were of .040-.042 with no weight sorting.
The only difference I noted at all was that during this match I would normally see a couple of unexplainable fliers but, having discarded two round from the 200 sorted that fell well out of the headspace and/or weight lots, there were none.
From outward appearance of these numbers I would think my rifle's ignition was liking the .040-.042 headspace better but accuracy was basically unchanged by the experiment.
In other words, except for culling two poor outliers, all that time and all that data was not necessary.