Not to disagree, but I did a 721 a few years back that by the barrel code was built in 1949. I bought it out of a Pawn Shop for about $290. It was pretty rough.I have a 1950 Rem 721 in 30.06. I also have a couple of Rem 700s in different calibers. That is not a very large sampling, but I think the build quality of the 721 is superior. I have shot a 2-inch group at a little over 400 yards with the 721, but it is used exclusively for hunting. My only negative on the 721 is the stock. It seems made to shoot iron sights with the drop of the butt. I put my 721 in a Boyd's walnut hunter stock. The factory trigger is excellent. If you're going to tear it apart for the receiver, it probably doesn't matter which one you choose.
Yep, but you usually have to relieve the bolt handle slot and use a 700 trigger. If you use a 700 trigger with ;a side safety, you have to mill a flat on the RH side of the tang for the lever. Lot easier if you have the choice to pick the 700. Have also used a 700 bolt in the 721/722 so that the bolt handle shape matches 700 inlets.I've got a 722 and I have had it in a H-S Precision stock for a 700. Gary
the 700 bolt works in a 721/22?Yep, but you usually have to relieve the bolt handle slot and use a 700 trigger. If you use a 700 trigger with ;a side safety, you have to mill a flat on the RH side of the tang for the lever. Lot easier if you have the choice to pick the 700. Have also used a 700 bolt in the 721/722 so that the bolt handle shape matches 700 inlets.
helpful, I have a few older actions/rifles.Yes. Plus using a 700 trigger places the finger piece in the correct position in a 700 stock (using a 721/722 trigger in a 700 stock doesn't turn out well). In short, replace all parts except the receiver with 700 parts.