To the Gunsmiths out there.
I'd like advice on this one. A year ago I had a Harrell’s Muzzle Brake fitted to my wife's 308 Remington 7600. Subsequently group sizes opened up and whereas before fitting the brake the rifle would hold 1/2 MOA, after fitting the brake this deteriorated to in excess of 1MOA.
I suspect this was caused by the muzzle diameter expanding due to removing metal to thread for the brake. The brake tenon 0.5" DIA X 32TPI X 0.5"long leaving 0.078" approx radial wall thickness over the bore diameter. The bullet clearance DIA through the brake is 0.328" (21/64")
So the question is, will back boring the muzzle diameter by the length of the brake engagement cure the problem?
If so how much clearance over the nominal groove diameter of 0.308 has been found to be adequate?
Thanks for your help.
I'd like advice on this one. A year ago I had a Harrell’s Muzzle Brake fitted to my wife's 308 Remington 7600. Subsequently group sizes opened up and whereas before fitting the brake the rifle would hold 1/2 MOA, after fitting the brake this deteriorated to in excess of 1MOA.
I suspect this was caused by the muzzle diameter expanding due to removing metal to thread for the brake. The brake tenon 0.5" DIA X 32TPI X 0.5"long leaving 0.078" approx radial wall thickness over the bore diameter. The bullet clearance DIA through the brake is 0.328" (21/64")
So the question is, will back boring the muzzle diameter by the length of the brake engagement cure the problem?
If so how much clearance over the nominal groove diameter of 0.308 has been found to be adequate?
Thanks for your help.