Brake designs , normally all 3 & 4 port "shark gill" brakes come with a pilot hole that is drilled out for the Cal. of bullet being shot.
When finished, this leaves a .330-.345 hole through the entire brake's length for a 30 Cal. weapon.
When fired, the gas's are funneled through the 1st ports, what is left goes through the .330 hole to the 2nd port, and so forth.
Some of the recoil reduction comes from a "jet" action from the gases exiting through the ports. The sharper/ higher the angle of the exit hole the greater the "jet" force .
In the example with the .330 hole through the brake the 1st port gets the majority of the gases.
My question is, if the bullet path hole, with the exception of the final exit hole were opened to 5.25" on a 5/8 x 24 thread thus allowing a more equal distribution of the gases to the 3 or 4 ports mean a greater reduction in recoil ??
When finished, this leaves a .330-.345 hole through the entire brake's length for a 30 Cal. weapon.
When fired, the gas's are funneled through the 1st ports, what is left goes through the .330 hole to the 2nd port, and so forth.
Some of the recoil reduction comes from a "jet" action from the gases exiting through the ports. The sharper/ higher the angle of the exit hole the greater the "jet" force .
In the example with the .330 hole through the brake the 1st port gets the majority of the gases.
My question is, if the bullet path hole, with the exception of the final exit hole were opened to 5.25" on a 5/8 x 24 thread thus allowing a more equal distribution of the gases to the 3 or 4 ports mean a greater reduction in recoil ??