Progressive reloading Sub-Forum?

[Daddymac]

I seems to me that the reloading forum is geared toward rifle competition and precision shooting, and I have learned a lot stalking around when it comes to my rifle loading. Over the last few years I have worked heavily with progressives for pistol and small rifle can killers, and I hate to stink up the regular reloading forum with progressive questions, they just seem a little out of place.

So, here is my question, is there enough interest in progressive reloading on this site to ask the boss for a Progressive sub-forum?
My thoughts were the number of positive replies could serve as a poll to check interest to see if it is even worth consideration.

Thanks.

 

[Retired Grunt]

Seems like a good idea.

 

[joshb]

There it is. The first step!!
We’re a fairly tolerant group here. We have some Dinosaurs, myself included, but we’re learning. Some of these new “rules” are a little tough to swallow but we’re trying to be inclusive , watch our tongues and mind our manners.
So now you “Progressives” want your own “special place” built so you don’t have to deal with all us “single pullers”?
Bahhhhumbug! Get off my lawn!!

 

[itchyTF]

If you want advice on progressives just ask AOC!!

I wouldn’t think there would be a need for a sub-forum. If someone doesn’t have any input on a progressive related question they just won’t respond.

 

[mgunderson]

Ask and be part of the conversation. Many shooter have a progressive and use it for part and or all of their loading. I don't see it being different. I have a progressive and an arbor press. Lots to learn from using each of them.

 

[garandman]

I like it. Progressive reloading is a VERY different animal. Right now I got a project going trying to get decent "accuracy" (Accurate SHooter Forum) from a AR15 loaded on a Dillon 550C.

 

[JEFFPPC]

There it is. The first step!!
We’re a fairly tolerant group here. We have some Dinosaurs, myself included, but we’re learning. Some of these new “rules” are a little tough to swallow but we’re trying to be inclusive , watch our tongues and mind our manners.
So now you “Progressives” want your own “special place” built so you don’t have to deal with all us “single pullers”?
Bahhhhumbug! Get off my lawn!!

Josh, your thinking of this wrong. It's a great idea. One of several steps needed to get this back to an accuracy forum.

 

[rkittine]

I have progressive loaders for pistol and shotgun rounds. Sure there are lots of members interested in what might be unique to progressive loaders. I have 5 MECs and a number of Starts and a Dillon

Bob

 

[joshb]

Josh, your thinking of this wrong. It's a great idea. One of several steps needed to get this back to an accuracy forum.

Please know that my tongue was firmly pressed in my cheek. I own 2 “progressive” presses. I choose to call mine a multi task press. I hate the word progressive, these days. It makes me itch.

 

[Daddymac]

Please know that my tongue was firmly pressed in my cheek. I own 2 “progressive” presses. I choose to call mine a multi task press. I hate the word progressive, these days. It makes me itch.

Ok, I get it, but can we call it a indexing multi task press?

 

[joshb]

Ok, I get it, but can we call it a indexing multi task press?

Auto indexing multi task press?

 

[Rsadams]

I use both kinds basically single stage for large rifle since there's only two dies and I want my powder really consistent.... But for pistol and rifle like .223/5.56 the progressive is the only way to go.... Actually there's some guys who use Dillon for precision loading... Plenty of videos on exactly how they do it... There's definitely a learning curve....

 

[Iowa Fox]

One re-loading forum is plenty. Opening post topic is all we need.

I do use arbor, single stage and progressive.

 

[jr600yd]

Check out Eric Cortina over on utube. He uses one and is one of the best F Class competitors around.