The OCW test worked real Easy for, Me,.. Started the Bullet's, "Shank portion" .040 to .050 Off ( above ) the "Doughnut Area" Looked at, Sierra, Nosler and Hogdon's Load Data ( Started at, Sierra Accuracy Load ) and found Good accuracy at, that Load and again at, a Tiny Bit Higher than, the Nosler Accuracy Load.Not trying to start a fight!! Just wanted to try and learn the best practices or what works for others.
Some say seat depth first and powder second. The older school says reverse it. One of the all-time winning S R bench rest shooters says do both at the same time with a matrix of powder charges across the page vs. seat depth down the page at equal intervals. Some S R bench rest shooters still do that with great results. I find however I approach it some sort of ladder needs to be done.Hey fellas,
When trying to hone in on the perfect load will you please share your technics.
Shall I find seating depth first and then work powder charge up?
You may find that going back to re-visit in-between those .010 increments will give you best results.Working on 7mm08 with 20" barrel for hunting. Barnes TTSX 140 gr with RL-15 and 8208 to see what works best. Going to use powder load data from book and load .030, .040, and .050 off lands to see what I get and adjust powder charge from there.
It's just that there are no two people on this forum that will agree on everything. Things get interesting. Me - I'd research what powder(s) are said to work really well for the cartridge after choosing your bullet type and weight that are most suited for your intended use and barrel twist. In that sized cartridge, I think your choice of powder (Rel 15) is exactly what I'd be trying first. Being a hunting cartridge, I'd use recommended book cartridge seating depth (COL) and whatever large rifle primer and brass you have. The "perfect load" can mean different things to different people - usually due to what the use will be. For my big game rifles, I'm happy with a load that will shoot under 1/2" MOA - and those Barnes TTSX 140's are certainly capable of that or better. I think you have already chosen a fantastic combo of powder and bullet - and hopefully they do well in your rig. I'd do a ladder test 3/10th grain apart. If you don't get anything good, switch powders. In my experience with those TTSX's in many calibers, they are either liked or not by a powder. I don't even try to tune bad loads anymore with those bullets unless I see something good- I just switch powders to see what improves.I see what you mean, I see similar threads.
I'll add since it's for hunting, know your mag length tolerance first. Pick aYou may find that going back to re-visit in-between those .010 increments will give you best results.
I shoot barnes in all my hunting rifles. All but one prefers .050 off the lands, so i start there and do my ladder test. Once i find the load, i run a seating depth test if needed. Most of my rifles dont need it as they usually shoot .2 - .5” with a couple about .1. Just my experience.Working on 7mm08 with 20" barrel for hunting. Barnes TTSX 140 gr with RL-15 and 8208 to see what works best. Going to use powder load data from book and load .030, .040, and .050 off lands to see what I get and adjust powder charge from there.
