• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Primer Pocket Uniform Led to Bolt Face Craters?

Monday shooter40

Gold $$ Contributor
I recently picked up a K+M SRP pocket uniformer and decided to try it on a lot of FC 6.5CM brass. During load testing everything appeared normal. Took the rifle to a match and i was getting 1 in 20 cases that had hard bolt lift and a very distinct gas leak around the primers. Cleaning the rifle after the match, i noticed that some of these cases actually cratered my bolt face and i went through the lot of brass and found where about 5 of the lot of 250, combustion gasses cut through the outer edge of the primer and damaged my bolt face.

My question is did uniforming my primer pockets lead to this result, or did my lot of brass just need to be retired? ive had primer pockets fail before, but not with this result. Im extremely hesitant to experiment with this anymore as i do not want to damage my bolt anymore. I have a spare, but best not to poke the bear.

Its a spicey load using H4350, FC SRP brass, Winchester #41 primer, Hornandy 147ELD.
 
I recently picked up a K+M SRP pocket uniformer and decided to try it on a lot of FC 6.5CM brass. During load testing everything appeared normal. Took the rifle to a match and i was getting 1 in 20 cases that had hard bolt lift and a very distinct gas leak around the primers. Cleaning the rifle after the match, i noticed that some of these cases actually cratered my bolt face and i went through the lot of brass and found where about 5 of the lot of 250, combustion gasses cut through the outer edge of the primer and damaged my bolt face.

My question is did uniforming my primer pockets lead to this result, or did my lot of brass just need to be retired? ive had primer pockets fail before, but not with this result. Im extremely hesitant to experiment with this anymore as i do not want to damage my bolt anymore. I have a spare, but best not to poke the bear.

Its a spicey load using H4350, FC SRP brass, Winchester #41 primer, Hornandy 147ELD.

Don't know how old the Winchester primers may have been that were involved in this incident. But several years ago there was a problem with several lots of Winchester LRP's that involved failure of the cups cracking around the od of the face of the primer. I experienced this personally. Search of this site may lead you to the lot numbers involved.
 
Primer seating felt normal for this lot. I seat with a RCBS hand primer. I have been using this combo during the component shortage with relatively decent success. I can typically keep my SD's in the single digits and groups are .5"-.75".

I have lapua brass and use it with CCI450's with stellar results, but ive never touched the primer pockets in any of those lots, so i cant really compare whats going on here between manufacturers. Yes, I love Lapua brass too, but this combo is kinda like a cheapskate/default load that i can always fall back on and have a good stash of these components that i want to use up during these components and pricing fiasco's. I have been using Federal brass for years with great success, and ive never experienced this particular issue. *with the understanding that federal brass has its shortcomings and limitations.*

This is my first time messing with a primer pocket.... and now i have a damaged rifle. I think I'll trash this lot of brass and leave them alone from here on out. I didnt gain anything out of the experiment as far as SD's/ES is concerened.

I will post some pics later today.
 
I'm gonna say its 3 things going on and uniformity pockets ain't 1 of them.
Stout load
Weak FC brass/ poor pockets
Winchester primers are smaller diameter.
I've never etched a bolt face using Winchester primer in Hornady, RP, Lapua, Norma, and Nosler brass.
I always uniform the pockets when doing brass prep.
 
Could try a different brand of primer? But the small rifle primers may need to be MAGNUMS to get a thick cup metal.
CCI450's

The Winchester #41 WMSRL is listed and sold as a NATO specification primer for 5.56X45mm. Unless Winchester has made a hash of it, you shouldn't get anything tougher than that.

https://www.midwayusa.com/product/1023007962

Almost certainly an overload as most posts say, maybe with the Federal brass having less capacity than other makes too. I've no experience of it in this cartridge, but in others where I've used it, soft case-heads plus reduced capacity = avoid 'stiff' loads.
 
I recently picked up a K+M SRP pocket uniformer and decided to try it on a lot of FC 6.5CM brass. During load testing everything appeared normal. Took the rifle to a match and i was getting 1 in 20 cases that had hard bolt lift and a very distinct gas leak around the primers. Cleaning the rifle after the match, i noticed that some of these cases actually cratered my bolt face and i went through the lot of brass and found where about 5 of the lot of 250, combustion gasses cut through the outer edge of the primer and damaged my bolt face.

My question is did uniforming my primer pockets lead to this result, or did my lot of brass just need to be retired? ive had primer pockets fail before, but not with this result. Im extremely hesitant to experiment with this anymore as i do not want to damage my bolt anymore. I have a spare, but best not to poke the bear.

Its a spicey load using H4350, FC SRP brass, Winchester #41 primer, Hornandy 147ELD.
Uniforming increases the depth of the pocket to some depth. It does not change the pocket o.d. and tightness. Hot loads!
 
My Rem 788 in .222 suffered that same damage years ago. Brass was #3 fired W-W, H4198 and a 50gr. Speer. Primers were Federal. In the heat of dogtown action this went on unnoticed. A third of the 100 ct. box had primers with a side split leading to a tiny burn through hole. Not a big deal to me with a low dollar rifle.

Photo just taken with a Teslong bore scope with mirror removed.
 

Attachments

  • Snap_001.jpg
    Snap_001.jpg
    516.5 KB · Views: 38
No swipe, no ejector marks.
This is the very reason you should not monitor pressure by ejector marks, bolt swipe, or flattened primers. So I'll ask the scientific question what was your head diameter when you started and what is it now? Sounds to me your pockets are loose. Loose enough where you will get gas leakage with a very high pressure load and cause a "fairy ring" on the bolt face, ie. the head diameter of your cases has enlarged due to repeated exposure to very high pressure. That repeated high pressure on your brass may not show up right away. That's why it's so important to monitor head diameter. Any expansion of more than .0008" will certainly lead to problems. Another question does your rifle have a small diameter firing pin for small primers?
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
166,283
Messages
2,215,620
Members
79,516
Latest member
delta3
Back
Top