No I wouldn’t recommend that.I believe I had read in a post about putting electrical tape on the rings ? Can anyone confirm this ?
I would not recommend that practice at all.I torque my rings to the base with a lapping bar installed in the rings. It helps keep things well aligned during tightening process.
I would not recommend that practice at all.
I do with two piece rings because you can’t guarantee that the scope base on another rifle has the same exact contact surfaces. And it probably won’t.So, if you swap scopes between guns, you'd completely disassemble and reassemble?
Preventing ring marks is just an added bonus to the methods I use. It’s not WHY I do it. I am very meticulous with scope mounting because I want to ensure the mounting of my optics is as solid as possible. Then it is never a question in my mind if something isn’t quite going my way on the target.Well, you're consistent.
After initial mounting, I swap scopes around without issue, and I've not had any ring marks (or slippage) since doing it this way.
You can find all kinds of it on Amazon. Doesn’t have to be specified for scope lapping. Lapping compound is lapping compound.The compound that I got with my lapping tool is used up. Is there a source, other than Sinclair, for this? I believe it is water based.
This has been discussed for years on the forums and nearly everyone who uses these rings a lot agrees there is no need to go that high. 25 is fine.Burris signature zee rings instructions say to torque to 30 to 35 in lbs. That seems to be a lot of torqe isn't it ?
