dstoenner
Silver $$ Contributor
I bought this scope off of this form back early last year. Mounted it on my Eliseo tube gun in place of a NXS 12-42 because I was running out of elevation on the 12-42 for 1000 yards. After I got it zero'd I did a tall target test to see how much elevation it had and check that it was indeed vertical. It was vertical and each 10 MOA rev gave me 10.5 inches on my target but at 3 REVs the displacement collapsed indicating I was at the end of the linear range. So for Christmas I asked for and got the new Buris XTR Signature rings. This let me add an additional 10 MOA so now I am 1 1/2 REV off the bottom. Now my ladder test showed I had 3 full REVs and 1/2 extra all linear except...
Except that the first REV went to 10.875 inches or 10.38 MOA. The second REV went to 21.5 inches or 20.5 MOA. The third REV went to 31.875 or 30.4 MOA. The third REV plus 5 MOA went to 36 inch or 34.38 MOA.
I did all of these measurements after I got home so couldn't do any thing but think about it. I needed to take this gun back to the range to do some practice so I too the ladder test back to the range and hung it up beside my practice targets. I put the scope at 22X which is the ranging magnification. Low and behold each group was right on the 10MOA marking.
So now I am really confused. How did doing the first REV add about .4 MOA and then each REV didn't add an additional .4 MOA but kept the same delta almost all the way up. When looked at through the scope I could not see the .4 MOA extra and the previous targets I did did not show this .4 MOA difference.
Some other points. This was shot indoors. I have no way of verifying the 100 yard marks but I would think these are pretty accurate. My target is beyond the 100 yard line by about 1 yard and my scope is behind the 0 yard line by about 2 yards so that is a total of about 103 yards. That would make them about 3% less in height than if it was 100 yards.
Also at the end of this test I dialed back to my 100 yard zero and fired a shot and it was in the original starting group so it returns to zero perfectly.
Hope somebody has some goo explanations because I sure don't.
One last question. Does anybody else have one of these 8-32X56 with .125 MOA clicks? According to the NF site this thing is supposed to have 65 MOA elevation but I am not getting that out of this scope.
Thanks
David
Except that the first REV went to 10.875 inches or 10.38 MOA. The second REV went to 21.5 inches or 20.5 MOA. The third REV went to 31.875 or 30.4 MOA. The third REV plus 5 MOA went to 36 inch or 34.38 MOA.
I did all of these measurements after I got home so couldn't do any thing but think about it. I needed to take this gun back to the range to do some practice so I too the ladder test back to the range and hung it up beside my practice targets. I put the scope at 22X which is the ranging magnification. Low and behold each group was right on the 10MOA marking.
So now I am really confused. How did doing the first REV add about .4 MOA and then each REV didn't add an additional .4 MOA but kept the same delta almost all the way up. When looked at through the scope I could not see the .4 MOA extra and the previous targets I did did not show this .4 MOA difference.
Some other points. This was shot indoors. I have no way of verifying the 100 yard marks but I would think these are pretty accurate. My target is beyond the 100 yard line by about 1 yard and my scope is behind the 0 yard line by about 2 yards so that is a total of about 103 yards. That would make them about 3% less in height than if it was 100 yards.
Also at the end of this test I dialed back to my 100 yard zero and fired a shot and it was in the original starting group so it returns to zero perfectly.
Hope somebody has some goo explanations because I sure don't.
One last question. Does anybody else have one of these 8-32X56 with .125 MOA clicks? According to the NF site this thing is supposed to have 65 MOA elevation but I am not getting that out of this scope.
Thanks
David