• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Optically centering scope?

Starting with a scope that has been optically centered, by rolling in V blocks, and adjusting till the cross hair intersection remains stationary as the scope is rotated, will tell you what changes may be needed in your scope mount system. Another key to correct mounting is a rifle vise that will allow you to level the rifle from side to side using one of these. http://www.brownells.com/.aspx/pid=6097/product/EXD_ENGINEERING_VERTICAL_RETICLE_INSTRUMENT
IMO everyone who mounts scopes should have both. Beyond that, an accurate plumb reference line should be used as a reference to rotate the scope so that the vertical cross hair is properly aligned. This should be done while with the bubble on the Vertical Reticle Instrument perfectly centered. Putting the icing on the cake consists on verifying that the scope tracks on a vertical line. Reticles can be slightly cocked,relative to the turrets. If they are, it is more important that the aiming point of the reticle tracks on a vertical line, than that the cross hair is vertical.
 
Varminterror said:
"The other reason I like to ensure I did the best I could to eliminate varability is because I'm a professional engineer with a small case of OCD (haha), so I'm typically one to err on the side of caution and take extra steps even if they aren't big ticket items. Plus, I'm more of a "hobby shooter" and "casual competitor" and don't invest as much as I should in my rigs to reach the level of accuracy that I expect from them."

You have a serious case of OCD... there is no reason to put yourself through this, other than OCD.

There are those that hypothesize that somehow, the scope works better when everything is in alignment (kinda like when the moon and planets are in alignment, the effects of gravity are less, and our bullets fly further ;) ).

Nothing could be further from the truth. The accuracy of the scope is not affected when the cross hairs are not centered - and when you get all the adjustments centered, then what are you going to do - use externally adjustable mounts like the old Unertl or discontinued Mitchel? Based on your OCD, you can't adjust your scope without destroying all the work you have done.

The "theory" of centering scopes is nonsense. It does no good, and you can't keep them centered.

I use Burris Signature mounts, with the plastic rings, and I set the scope so that my 100 yd zero is at the BOTTOM of the elevation scale - If I pay for 40 moa of adjustment, I don't want to waste half of it.


Meow ;)
 
msinc said:
The simple answer to this is covered already...you optically center the scope so you can have a starting point to make base adjustments {if you have adjustable bases, otherwise about all you can do is shim for elevation corrections} to allow maximum adjustment any way you might need to go for long range shooting. Which is of course where you might need it the most. I would like to add two points to this thread...first is that counting clicks gives you for certain a mechanically centered scope but not necessarily optically centered. What alot of folks don't realize is that you dont actually move the reticle. That is fixed and already centered. What moves is a washer that causes the shooter to "center" or aim at the right point. Kind of a bad way to explain that. True optical center can only be acheived by spinning the scope in V blocks and adjusting until the reticle center doesn't spin in a circle as covered previously.

The second point is that another reason to optically center a scope would be for absolute optimal light transmission. The less the washer is off center the more available ambient light gets straight to your eye...and the more you see at the edge of dark. Not a fix for less than perfect optical glass but for a given scope it is always best if the light goes straight thru.

I didn't know Zee rings allowed for sight in adjustments...it appears they are made so the one ring will positively align with the other. If this is the case then Zee rings wont help this topic at all.

Just about NONE of the above is true, and the poster knows nothing about optics or scopes (there are NO washers in the scope!).

I wrote this for another website some years ago, and it is appropriate that is be posted here at this time.

---

© 1999, 2009, Paul J Coburn. Ballistic Research Labs.

"I've answered questions about scopes and parallax about 900 times, and it's always a long drawn out thing, going several e-mails, and a few phone calls. It doesn't seem to make any difference how long the guy has been shooting, this one always keep screwing guys up.

OK... here goes, and it's gonna be a long one.

There are several things that go on inside a scope, and in the eyes at the same time. Some of them work against each other.
Some terminology first...

And we'll leave out lenses that are there to correct some optical or color errors, but don't have anything to do with image forming. We'll start at the front of it all, and work back.

The "Object"... the "object" (target) that you are looking (shooting) at.

The "Objective". The front lens is called the "Objective"... it forms the first image of the "object" we are looking at (that why they call it the Objective)

It is the lens that "captures" all the light, that is solely responsible for the image quality of the scope... if the objective is poor, you can't fix the poor image later. This lens is usually made of two different types of glasses (called "elements") sandwiched together, and is called an "Achromat". The Achromat is fully color corrected for blue and green. The red wavelengths are partially corrected, but have what is called "residual color errors". These are very minor.

This is the normal type of objective used in shooting and spotting scopes. In quality, they can vary from bad, through sorta OK, to pretty damn good.

If one of the elements is made of an "ED" glass, or a "Fluorite" (CaF) glass, the two element lens can be very good to outstanding.

In some instances, objective lenses are made of three elements, and all three colors (blue, green, and red) are completely corrected. This type of lens is called an "Apochromat", and this is the finest lens that can be bought. The best of these can also have "ED" glass, or Fluorite as one of the elements.

The "First image plane". The Objective focuses the light to make an image of the subject, just like a camera lens. This image is upside down, and right/left reversed. This is the first image plane, but NOT the "First image plane" that is talked about when shooters talk about reticles.

The "Erector lens"... (if it is a group of lenses, it is called the "Erector cell"). Because the first image is upside down/wrong way around, we (as shooters) can't use it... so we flip it around with a simple optical group called the "erector cell". This cell gives us a new image that is right way around, called the second image plane.

But this cell has another very important job. Moving this cell causes this second image plane to move... so micrometer spindles are put against the cell, to get elevation and windage adjustments.

The total amount of elevation/windage available in the scope (MOA from bottom to top) is determined by how much the spindles can move the cell. The amount of movement "per click" is simply determined by the thread of the screw, and the spacing of the detents on the spindle.

The "Second image plane". This is the second real image plane in the scope, and this is the image plane that shooters call the "First image plane" when talking about reticles. In a fixed or variable power scope with a "First image plane reticle", the reticle would be placed in this image plane.

The "Zoom group". In a variable scope with standard (non-magnifying) reticle, the zoom group of optics would follow #5. This group of lenses can change the size of the image plane in #5 and then form a new (third) image plane behind it.

The "Third image plane". In variable power scopes, this is the plane that the reticle is placed in. By being here, it allows the image to change sizes, but the reticle to stay the same size. In the context of reticles, this is the image plane that is referred to as the "second image plane"

The "Eyepiece". This optical group is like a jewelers' loupe. It is (or should be) a super fine magnifier. It's only job in the whole world, is to focus on the reticle.

Let me repeat that for those that live in Rio Linda...

THE ONLY JOB FOR THE EYEPIECE IS TO FOCUS YOUR EYE ON THE RETICLE!!!!

It CANNOT adjust, or compensate for, or do anything else when things look bad in the scope, or when you can't hit the target... and you CANNOT use the eyepiece to try to correct for parallax. That is sheer folly at best, and raw stupidity at worst.

OK... now that you know what the insides are like... let's move on. We'll use the zoom scope for our examples, because if you can understand the zoom scope, then the fixed scope is a walk in the park.

In the scope that is set for infinity range, the object forms an image (upside down, right/left reversed) behind the objective (the first image plane)... the erector cell "sees" that image, and flips it over and makes it right way around in a NEW image plane (the Second image plane). The zoom group adjusts the size of this image plane, and makes a NEW image plane (the Third image plane) that is the desired size. There is a reticle placed in this last image plane, and the eyepiece focuses on the reticle AND the image at the same time. When things are good, that's how the scope works!

But... now the booger falls into the soup... IF the third image plane and the reticle are not exactly, (and I mean EX-ACT-LY) in the same place, then your eye cannot see them LOCKED together as one picture.

It sees them as two separate pictures, and the eye will look at each separately, and the eye can also look AROUND one to see the other.

Lenses are measured in metrics (aka Millimeters). Not because the Europeans wanted the metric system 25 years ago, but because optical strings and chains of lenses (like scopes) are really a string of numbers.

There are constant ratios of "this divided by that's" that give image sizes, "F-ratios", and image locations. It's so damn easy to do the engineering using a 10 based system that the optical guys were using the metric system way back in the 1800's.

The objective has a "Focal length"... this is the distance behind the lens that the first image plane falls when making an image if a subject that is at infinity (or very damn far away).

If the objective has a focal length of 100mm, then the image of that 1000 yd target is 100mm behind the lens.

But the problem with geometric optics (which is what we are dealing with here), is that they follow the laws of geometry... and optics make triangles like rabbits make babies.

AND... in an optical chain, when you change one thing, one angle, one ANYTHING, everything else follows along and the changes are BASED on the ratios involved at THAT stage.

If we take that same target, and move it to 100 yds, the image in the scope moves BACKWARDS, going further into the scope. Not by much, but it doesn't take much, because we are dealing with very small distances inside the scope, and very high magnifications.

How far the image moves back, and what it's new position is, is predictable by the mathematical ratios of the angles formed by the subject and the first image... OR (for us dummies that lost our slip sticks) by the ratio of the distances to the Target and the focal length, multiplied by the focal length, then ADDED to the focal length.

The target is at 100 yds (91440mm), the focal length of the objective is 100, so the displacement is 1/914 x 100, which means that the first image is now at ~100.1mm.

Hmmm only .1mm, that doesn't seem like much.

Read the following paragraph twice...

In a 1x scope, 0.1mm would mean nothing... but this displacement is repeated throughout the chain, AND if any of the optical groups change the image ratio (aka image size), then the displacement (aka ERROR) is changed in direct proportion to the increase in magnification. So in a 3x scope, it would be .3mm, and in a 10x scope, it would be 1mm, and in a 30 power scope, the image would be 3mm behind the reticle. Now, you should have seen a pattern in this last paragraph.
READ THIS TWICE!!

With the same error in the objective (scope focused at 1000, and target at 100), the parallax INCREASES WITH MAGNIFICATION... got it?

If not, READ IT TWO MORE TIMES!!

OK... now, if we do the same math for closer distances, like 50 yds, and 25 yds we will see that the error gets really big, so that with a target at 50 yards, and the scope set at 35 or 65 yds, the parallax makes the combination un-usable.

Parallax is...

When the image of the target, and the reticle, are not in EXACTLY the same plane, and by moving the eye up and down... or side to side, either the target OR the reticle appears to move in relation to the other.

You might see the target move and the reticle stay still, or you might see the target stay still and the reticle move over it... both are exactly the same, and which you see, is only a matter of your OWN perception.

It is NOT possible to have parallax while moving up and down, but not have it when you are moving side to side.

If you think that is what you have, you have other problems... either you are moving the rifle, or you have eye problems.

How to set Up a Scope!

This is the only way to do it...
First...

Screw the eyepiece out (CCW) all the way, until it stops.

If you wear glasses, put them on.

Hold the scope up and look OVER the scope at the sky, and relax your eyes. Then move the scope in front of your eye.

The reticle should look fuzzy

Turn the eyepiece in 1/2 turn, and do the same thing again. You will have to do for a while before the reticle starts to look better. When you start getting close, then turn the eyepiece 1/4 turn each time.

Do this until the reticle is fully sharp and fully BLACK immediately when you look through the scope.

Than back off one turn and do it again to make sure you are in the same place.

Then LOCK the ring on the eyepiece, and leave it alone FOREVER!
Second...

Set the scope down on something solid, where it can see something at a long distance... half a mile or longer is good. It can be on the rifle, and rested in sand bags at the range... but pick something at least 1000 yds away... even further if possible. If the scope has an "AO" Adjustable Objective, then set it for infinity, and look at the distant object, and move your head from one side to the other, or up and down if you prefer. If the reticle seems to move, there is parallax. Change the distance setting and try again... if you are very careful, you can move your eye, and adjust the distance at the same time, seeing which direction gets better.

(Something to know - the graduations/calibrations on the AO of a scope are approximations ONLY... they are to get you close. If shooting is critical, then check for parallax by moving your eye and adjusting until there is NO movement of the crosshair/target images).

With front objective adjustments, you can turn them either way without worry... BUT with side adjustment scopes, like the MK4-M3, the M3-LR, or the other LR family of scopes, the adjustment must ALWAYS be made from the infinity end of the dial. Turn the adjustment all the way until it stops (past infinity), and then start turning it in a little at a time, until there is no parallax. If you "overshoot" the proper setting, you can't just turn back a little, you must go back to stop at the end of the dial, and start over again. While "AO"s dials are locked in place, and if the indicated distance doesn't match the real distance, there's nothing you can do about it... the side focus dials are not locked in place. Once you have found the setting for infinity on the side focus models, then (CAREFULLY) loosen the screws, and set the dial so that little sideways infinity symbol is lined up with the hash mark, so it is calibrated. You can also make little marks or put on a paper tape for other ranges instead of using the round dots that don't match any range.

Now you can set it to infinity, but remember that you MUST turn the dial all the way past infinity to the stop, EVERY TIME before going from a close range to a longer range. If you are set for 500 yds, you can go directly to 100 yds, but if you are set for 100 and want to set it to 500, you MUST go all the way back to the stop, and then go to 500 This is because there is a fair amount of backlash (aka SLOP) in this wheel linkage to the focusing cell, so you can set it only from one direction to make sure the slop is always on one side. The other problem with it is, even if you decided that you wanted to calibrate from the other end... the recoil will push the cell back. SO you must ALWAYS set these dials from the infinity end of their scales.

To make it easy to not have to remember...

I always start from the end stop when I change range, no matter which direction I'm going in... it adds about 0.023 seconds!

That's about it on rifle scopes.

There are thousands of "opinions" on scopes on the web, but this is the science from one that does optics for a living.

Now...

You have a friend that says to set up a scope a different way?

The guy at the next shooting bench at the range said to do it a different way?

You know some guy who's in the Marines says to use your eyepiece to correct parallax?

You got a friend that shoots bench rest and thinks he knows about scopes, and says something different?

Before you take their advice, ask them to explain how a scopes works from the inside out.

This is the way to do it, because this is the way scopes work. "

---

And that's it.

Meow ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hal
Factory receivers' scope base attachment holes are often not in good alignment, sometimes to the extent that a windage adjustable ring/base system is needed. Also I have never run a lap on a pair of rings that were perfectly aligned and round. Rings generally have sharp corners and edges where their halves come together, that can leave marks on fragile scope finishes. If one cannot do something with the rings and or mounts to align the scope with the rifle, a good deal of the available windage adjustment may become unavailable. If the erector tube is shoved over to one side inside the main tube, less vertical adjustment may be available. If a scope has to adjusted to near the top of its range to be zeroed, less adjustment is available for longer range shots. For all of these reasons it is desirable to be able to make adjustments in the rings and or mounts so that the scope is pretty well aligned left to right, and near the bottom of its vertical adjustment range at what ever yardage it is to be sighted in at. The Burris Signature Zee rings take care of pretty much all of these problems, and when mounting a scope with this system, it can be a good idea to start with a centered scope, and note the horizontal and vertical distances of the point of aim from the point of impact, at a known range. With this information, inserts can be selected, and the their most advantageous orientation determined, so that both horizontal and vertical adjustment can be accomplished simultaneously, so that adjustment range is not wasted. All it takes is a little time, and some math.
 
Some thoughts.

1. Setting scope so 100-yard zero is at one extreme of adjustment. -- That is clever so long as the scope operates reliably near the extremes of travel. I've had a couple Leupold that did not. In the last 10% of travel (on either extreme), click values became erratic. With better scopes, this should not be an issue

2. I think it is sensible to set up Burris inserts or adjustable windage rings so that the scope starts in the center of its windage travel.

3. Catshooter writes: "THE ONLY JOB FOR THE EYEPIECE IS TO FOCUS YOUR EYE ON THE RETICLE!!!!

It CANNOT adjust, or compensate for, or do anything else when things look bad in the scope, or when you can't hit the target... and you CANNOT use the eyepiece to try to correct for parallax."

With scopes such as Zeiss, Schmidt & Bender, Swarovski -- models which have true diopter-adjusting eyepieces, you very definitely use the eyepiece to make the target appear sharp -- that is the point of the diopter -- to allow individuals to shoot without the need for corrective lenses. For example, in my right eye I take a - 1.75 correction. I can either shoot with my contact lenses (and no diopter change on the scope), or I can remove my contact lenses, and dial the requisite correction with the +/- diopter eyepiece, which is confirmed by a fuzzy target becoming sharp again. (NOTE: This assumes that the parallax has otherwise been seen correctly for the target distance.)

464393.jpg


Because few domestic scope makers offer diopter correction (because they pinch pennies), many writers forget that this feature is offered on premium scopes.
 
On eyepiece adjustment:
Some scopes have eyepiece adjustment threads that produce a lot of in and out movement per degree of rotation, such that the entire range of focus can be encompassed within a half turn each way from center. Because all of the settings are on the same revolution, markings are a practical way to allow shooters to return to the same setting. Another result of this fast focus is that things seem to pop in and out of focus very abruptly. This sensation is made more noticeable because the adjustment may be made without removing the eye from the scope. This multiple lead, fast pitch type of thread does not lend itself to the use of lock rings, so an axial tension spring is used to hold the setting, similar to what is used on many adjustable objectives. Additionally this may allow for some give when the eyepiece is bumped from the rear.

With many scopes that follow traditional American design, the eyepiece adjustment is done with a single lead, fine pitch thread, without a tension spring. Because of this, alignment depends on a close fit, and when O ring seals are added, the effect is a rather high level of friction. This along with the possibility that multiple turns of the eyepiece are needed to traverse the traverse the adjustment range, makes it impractical to use fixed diopter markings, since it would be difficult to discern how many turns were appropriate between setting by looking at any system of markings. All of this tends to create a situation where the eye is removed from behind the eyepiece when gross adjustments are being made. This also removes the appearance of things snapping in and out of focus.They do, just very gradually, and the viewer looses his frame of reference each time his eye is away from the scope.

Now, as to the effect of eyepiece focus and target image sharpness..... While it is true that the goal of perfect eyepiece adjustment is to have its plane of focus coincident with that of the reticle, there is some depth of focus in which the eye's ability to compensate makes the reticle appear correctly sharp and dark even though it is slightly out of adjustment. Within this range, adjustment may find a place where the target image is sharper, either because the scope is low powered and has no provision for parallax/target image sharpness adjustment, or because it does, and it is slightly off focus and the slight eyepiece maladjustment moves its focal plane to a place that, while inducing a slight amount of parallax, improves the sharpness of the target image.

Also it should be mentioned that small amounts of parallax, that might not even be noticed at lower magnifications, become easier to spot at high magnifications of say 36x and above. In the latter case it is entirely possible to miss the exact point of perfection, when using the usual method of adjustment. One can have a situation where the reticle appears to be sharp and dark when glanced at, while the scope is pointed at a featureless sky, and still find that there is some small amount of parallax when the target image is adjusted for greatest sharpness, or conversely if the setting of the objective is changed to remove all parallax, finding that the target is no longer as sharp as before. Telling someone that he may not fiddle with the adjustments until peak image sharpness and zero parallax are at the same point of adjustment seems to be non productive. I have done so many times, for myself and others. I should add that this has been a major bone of contention in some previous discussions on this board. So be it. Luckily, we do not require each others permission or blessing to report what we have actually done, and in my mind experience trumps theory every time. Furthermore I would suggest that if one says for instance that according to engineering theory, a bumblebee cannot fly, then I would think that an adjustment in theory would be more in order, than grounding all the worlds bees;-) Flame on ye self appointed experts. Surely, I am not one.
 
Man, did I open up a can of worms!

First off, I have to thank Boyd for his time on the phone a few nights ago, what an invaluable resource for a guy like me just learning the ropes!! Not to embarrass the guy, but he was very pleasant to talk with, very knowledgeable, and very helpful, especially for offering his help to a complete stranger. So again Boyd, Thanks for all of your help and advice!

Secondly, from an engineering and manufacturing standpoint, I have VERY little faith in performance for any scope near the maximum adjustment ranges. In my LIMITED experience, I'd much rather be optically centered, at least starting out.

Whether it really makes a real difference or not, I believe it does, so frankly, it does. I've spent the last 10yrs+ of my life as a professional athlete (obviously NOT pro shooter), and have had enough experience that as long as you cover your basics, that even though the rest of the "black magic", superstition, or routine that different competitors go through may not have any REAL effect on equipment performance, it has a huge effect on the mental comfort level.

So yeah, I definitely believe that optically centering scopes is an important component of mounting optics from a REAL performance standpoint, and it DEFINITELY gives me peace of mind, so if it's wasting 20min every time I mount a scope, then at least it's only my own time I'm wasting.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,614
Messages
2,199,646
Members
79,013
Latest member
LXson
Back
Top