• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Opinions needed for a 40X

Rems typically have a code stamped on the barrel just in front of the action and maybe below the stock line. It is the most useful in dating the rifle. Not sure if the 40X's followed this procedure.
40X barrels were date coded also. I see some stamping just after the caliber stamps, but picture not sharp enough to read the letters. This is the date the barrel was made, usually close to date rifle was assembled. I've owned several of these stocks, both in complete rifles and just stocks that were made like this. Apparently Rem. thought of the longer accessory rail after the change over to the 700 style bolt or they simply wanted to use up what short rails they had. The rimfire stocks of the same era were identical except for 2 features. On the rimfire stocks, there is a shallow relief below about the center of the action to provide clearance for the screw head that holds the ejector in the action. Also, on the front of the comb, the bolt relief slot for the rimfire is shorter and will not let you remove a centerfire bolt unless this slot is lengthened. If this is done, it almost always obvious. So if this was originally a rimfire stock that the barreled action was put in, those would be the tell tale signs. I've put several 40X rimfires in centerfire stocks and vice versa over the years. Of course, once a centerfire action is bedded in a rimfire stock, only the bolt relief slot is an indication. I cannot tell for sure, but this appears to be a standard weight barrel, which was fairly common early on, but discontinued not too long after stainless barrels appeared and apparently demand for standard barrels declined. My last new SS standard barrel 40X was about 1975. Remington would not make a repeater with a standard barrel -- they claimed accuracy was not always up to their standards with that combination.
 
Stock is walnut, flat bottom, with a fore end stop. Also has the two barrel bedding screws in the fore end. Having a serial number in the 18xxx and an XB style bolt handle, I wonder if it might be a "transitional" model, made maybe around 1962, and Remington failed to stamp the "B" after the serial number.
On Win. 52A models, they didn't stamp the A after the serial number until they had shipped out quite a few rifles . I think with Remington, it was an afterthought to add the B for the change in the bolt handle, safety, trigger and the machining involved Probably shipped out several before adding the B to the serial number. Might be a quite unique specimen.
 
"The “A” model revision took place in February of 1935 at approximately 36700 s/n range. It ran until early in 1937 when the “B” model replaced it. This would have been about 44400. The actual production stamping of “A” models started about 39700. These are just approximate dates based on much observation and Winchester Product Change Notices."

This from a post on the Winchester Collectors forum.
 
40X barrels were date coded also. I see some stamping just after the caliber stamps, but picture not sharp enough to read the letters. This is the date the barrel was made, usually close to date rifle was assembled. I've owned several of these stocks, both in complete rifles and just stocks that were made like this. Apparently Rem. thought of the longer accessory rail after the change over to the 700 style bolt or they simply wanted to use up what short rails they had. The rimfire stocks of the same era were identical except for 2 features. On the rimfire stocks, there is a shallow relief below about the center of the action to provide clearance for the screw head that holds the ejector in the action. Also, on the front of the comb, the bolt relief slot for the rimfire is shorter and will not let you remove a centerfire bolt unless this slot is lengthened. If this is done, it almost always obvious. So if this was originally a rimfire stock that the barreled action was put in, those would be the tell tale signs. I've put several 40X rimfires in centerfire stocks and vice versa over the years. Of course, once a centerfire action is bedded in a rimfire stock, only the bolt relief slot is an indication. I cannot tell for sure, but this appears to be a standard weight barrel, which was fairly common early on, but discontinued not too long after stainless barrels appeared and apparently demand for standard barrels declined. My last new SS standard barrel 40X was about 1975. Remington would not make a repeater with a standard barrel -- they claimed accuracy was not always up to their standards with that combination.
Took the barreled action out of the stock for more inspection. There are no other stampings on the barrel other than shown in the photos. The left side has only the caliber stamp (.222REM. MAG) and the right side the proof mark and test stamp.
 
Looking at 3 different 40X stainless barrels:
#1 .220 Swift, stamped PI on the left side after the caliber, stamping on the same line = June '76
#2 .22-250, stamped KY in the same manner as the Swift on the left side = May 74
#3 .30-06, stamped with a K and the number 4, just in front of the REP proofmark on the RH side. The number 4 is obviously a later stamp and may have been struck over another letter that was there. The K would indicate June, but no year that I can read, The number 4 indicates a rifle retuned from the factory with no service done. Date stamping may have been a little haphazardly done. 40X rimfires are also usually date coded and are in the same serial number sequence with the centerfires. Maybe someone with a 40X (rf or cf) near the OP's number has a date code on the barrel and that would get him close. Just guessing his rifle was mfg. about 1962-63. More info:
 
1738273744234.jpeg
1738274228619.jpeg
1738274277841.jpeg
1738274313550.jpeg
This is my unknown barreled receiver. No date codes or proof marks. The receiver has a notch on the upper front of the receiver, stripper clip cuts, and drilled and tapped on the LH rear of the receiver for iron sights.
 
I would GUESS it is an early model and early 60's would be what I mean. Te chrome moly barrels were early guns. Keep in mind that much like cars of the era, model changes often used up parts from previous years. I think it is basicaly original, and is an early model. Value? I have not the faintest idea. Guns cost way more today than I think they are worth, so my estimates are usually low.
 
Needing some info on a Remington 40X rifle. Serial number is 183xx. Chambered in 222 Rem Mag, which is stamped into the barrel on left side, just ahead of the receiver. No other markings of any kind are on the left side. On the right side, in same location, is the REP. proof mark, plus the test stamp. Barrel is 27 1/2 inch, and is chrome moly. The bolt handle is swept back, similar to those on the 700s. However, there is no "B" suffix after the serial number as found on the 40XBs. This rifle appears totally unmolested and original, but has the later style bolt. Any thoughts on that, or idea when this might have been made?
Jeff Bartlett
The very early 40X's from what I remember were more of a Benchrest Model before the XB
Back When Mike Walker was around and an Engineer for Remington
many had a 2 oz trigger originally made by... Hart i believe
See what type of trigger it has
I know one of my Rem 700's that has the Tombstone Safety serial number 166xxx
Was made in the 60's
Sounds like a good find you have there on that 40x
a 222Mag is a very cool caliber
 
The first 40x CF rifles were 722 style bolts. Early on they switched to the swept bolt of the 700. The chrome moly barrels were also early production. My brain is fuzzy, but there were changes through the years in the barrel profile and I think this profile in the chrome moly had a different designation. I recall him saying a "b" barrel, but that memory is very wispy in my mind. It is of a thinner profile. I had a friend who was a Remington rep for years. He had one and he explained it to me, but that was a long time ago...25 years I would guess. Anyhow, that profile was replaced by the "rangemaster" profile we are accustomed to on the SS barreled guns, 27+ inches. The 40XBR had SS barrels and they were of 20 and 24 or 26 IIRC in length. This is NOT an XBR. In fact it is not a 40 XB. It is and early 40X

This is an early gun. Not commonly seen in good shape. It isn't NIB or in perfect unfired shape, but it appears to be handled and used sparingly. It has all of its parts. Not a bad snag.

It is not a Vietnam rifle...sorry JD. Those were much different.
 
When I asked about the Viet Nam rifle, I was referring to the pics that Butch posted. -- 308, grooved for strippers, US stamp. Seems I've heard stories of a time period when both Win M70's and Rem 700,s were in service as sniper rifles. jd
 
The very early 40X's from what I remember were more of a Benchrest Model before the XB
Back When Mike Walker was around and an Engineer for Remington
many had a 2 oz trigger originally made by... Hart i believe
See what type of trigger it has
I know one of my Rem 700's that has the Tombstone Safety serial number 166xxx
Was made in the 60's
Sounds like a good find you have there on that 40x
a 222Mag is a very cool caliber
Thanks for your info. This trigger is definitely a 2 oz. one. I believe that having a factory marked chrome moly barrel, instead of stainless, dates this rifle to pre-1965. Rifle appears totally unaltered other than the Weaver scope bases.
Thanks to you and everyone else who commented. I think we have figured this one out.
Jeff Bartlett
 
H-1...yep, that is the foggy memory brought into clarity. Very similar to the later 24 inch varmint special profile from the 70's and 80's on the once gorgeous Varmint Special BDL 700.
 
Thanks for your info. This trigger is definitely a 2 oz. one. I believe that having a factory marked chrome moly barrel, instead of stainless, dates this rifle to pre-1965. Rifle appears totally unaltered other than the Weaver scope bases.
Thanks to you and everyone else who commented. I think we have figured this one out.
Jeff Bartlett
Wow, that is very cool!
It kind of looked like there was an adjustment screw underneath on the trigger shoe itself
I believe Hart allowed for a fore and aft adjustment for trigger position
But I couldnt tell for sure in the pics.
Anyway that is quite a find!
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,794
Messages
2,203,486
Members
79,128
Latest member
Dgel
Back
Top