The great old S&W Model 52 didn't leave the factory until it held its 38 Special wadcutter groups below 2" at 50 yards.
Upon noting the velocities of the 5.7x28 40-gr load I immediately thought "rimless, bottleneck, centerfire 22 WMR".
-
Sub 2" at 50 is often claimed, but not as often delivered in the real world, outside of dedicated bullseye guns. I shot the Rocks in 10 degree, somewhat windy weather, over a couple of sandbags, with their not so great 4-5 lb triggers. I plan to do more tests when the nice weather returns, and in particular, some 100+ yard tests.
Not even claiming the Rock is the greatest 5.7, but for the price, it seems to be doing quite well.
Every 22WMR velocity table I've seen is for rifle length barrels, not a 5" pistol. I did some tests a long time
ago with WMR, and found the pistol lost around 300 fps over the rifle. This was before the V-max WMR
loads; I plan on testing those, too when that nice weather returns, which is June-October, in Minnesota.
Looking forward to the fun.
The S&W 5.7 should have a significant edge with their locking bolt system. Case stretch is ridiculous in
the blow back FN's -close to .100" shoulder stretch. The Rock is less than half that, but that's still a lot.
Ruger uses a barrel locking system similar to the Rock, so would expect a similar case stretch for both.