• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

New Marlin/Ruger Lever Gun

I am NOT a lever guy. However, I love the way they look and feel. I have toyed with the idea of getting one>>>but it would be a Henry. Having said that, if the new Ruger / Marlin is what you say, I might be swayed to get one IF I can talk myself into getting a lever gun! I probably would do nothing with it but handle it around the house and LOOK at it! I have no need for one>>>BUT when has "NEED" ever stopped a guy from buying something he likes??? LOL!!!
Out of curiosity, why a Henry?
 
They are AMERICAN, gorgeous, high quality and come in almost an infinite variety. I am torn between .357Mag and .44Mag. But I am not sure I will even get a lever>>>but I am trying to talk myself into one!
Thanks. My one levergun is an 1894 Marlin in 32-20. Shoots great, is easy on the shoulder, was well cared for by the previous owner(s), and has some pretty decent factory lumber.
 
Would a 336 handle it or does it need to be an 1895? Send them a request for it, if theres any demand they will build it. You could also get a gunsmith to rebarrel one for you
The Marlin M 336 was chambered in .356 winchester. Supposedly made from 1983-86 about 2500 or so. The only problem I can see is the seemingly severe reluctance among US shooters to embrace the 35 caliber. It would be one nice lever action, for closer in shooting big game, undoubtedly a good 200 yard cartridge with a 200 grain bullet if loaded to 2450 fps and you figure out the trajectory! Even better would be if they put a spiral to the magazine like the old Remington 141 pumps so you could use pointed bullets.

 
Last edited:
I am NOT a lever guy. However, I love the way they look and feel. I have toyed with the idea of getting one>>>but it would be a Henry. Having said that, if the new Ruger / Marlin is what you say, I might be swayed to get one IF I can talk myself into getting a lever gun! I probably would do nothing with it but handle it around the house and LOOK at it! I have no need for one>>>BUT when has "NEED" ever stopped a guy from buying something he likes??? LOL!!!

Everybody who shoots needs at least one lever-action rifle. But then, you know that.

I'd consider a Henry, too. Never had one, though I've shot a few. A decent .44mag would do nicely.

I'd also consider a mid-1950s Marlin in .30-30, if I were looking for a deer rifle, or a 1960s vintage Marlin in .44mag.

It'll be interesting to see what Ruger comes up with. I'd like to see them go with a handful of tried-and-true basic platforms, then get their cost structure down. If they can do that, but infuse the whole process with the reputed "legendary" Ruger reliability and quality, then they might be able to hit this one out of the ballpark. But at $1300 MSRP, I suspect many will be hesitant.
 
My 35 Remington was a 1" gun with hand loads with 200g hornady tipped bullet(lever powder), a 358 Winchester would be the mack daddy round in a lever gun.

I had a 45/70, sold it after shooting 1 shot....no fun factor for me. I had a 444 Marlin that I grew up deer hunting with, 265g Hornady with a max load of 4198 was close to an inch groups at 100 yards, I killed a lot of oak trees with this 444.
 
My 35 Remington was a 1" gun with hand loads with 200g hornady tipped bullet(lever powder), a 358 Winchester would be the mack daddy round in a lever gun.

I had a 45/70, sold it after shooting 1 shot....no fun factor for me. I had a 444 Marlin that I grew up deer hunting with, 265g Hornady with a max load of 4198 was close to an inch groups at 100 yards, I killed a lot of oak trees with this 444.
A .444 is very potent medicine!!
 
Everybody who shoots needs at least one lever-action rifle. But then, you know that.

I'd consider a Henry, too. Never had one, though I've shot a few. A decent .44mag would do nicely.

I'd also consider a mid-1950s Marlin in .30-30, if I were looking for a deer rifle, or a 1960s vintage Marlin in .44mag.

It'll be interesting to see what Ruger comes up with. I'd like to see them go with a handful of tried-and-true basic platforms, then get their cost structure down. If they can do that, but infuse the whole process with the reputed "legendary" Ruger reliability and quality, then they might be able to hit this one out of the ballpark. But at $1300 MSRP, I suspect many will be hesitant.
I don't care for the fish belly forearms on the Henry rifles.
 
I have hunted in one of, if not the coldest place on earth. Taking your gloves off is not realistic and I bet if you did, your fingers are not going to work like you'd need.
I've posted it before but: Inside front doorView attachment 1301015
Oh yeah, no doubt.
When it was like this growing up in MI, shooting/hunting was usually the last thing on my mind.
Yeah, I've spent weeks in the winters in Wyoming, and some in the midwest, where temperatures stayed at or below -10°F, and I know how fast your fingers go numb if not well covered. My winter gloves definitely would NOT cut it in such weather, especially handling a piece of steel.
Here in the Willamette valley of Oregon, where temps almost never dip below 30°F and seldom above 95°F, I have become even more "wimpified".
 
I WISH for one in 32-20 or 327, either would suite me.
Secondly it would be fantastic to see a 480 Ruger or bring back the 357 Maximum.


I have an 1894 in 357, it performs wayyyyyy over what one would think
 
LOVE my Marlin 336's. I have them in 44 mag and a couple in 30-30 plus a 35.

Used my 30-30, that is a 24" version that looks like the Ruger/Marlin in the video but longer, to take my first doe of this past season DRT at 160 yards. Then later that day my second at 220 yards. That one was not only a DRT but it literally never kicked.

Now you can't "kick" with performance like that.
 
I handled an H009 Henry today. Unimpressed, to say the least. Wood lacked any character. The octagon barrel was brightly blued, but it looked like it was polished with a buffing wheel; the corners were all rounded off even at the muzzle. You couldn't tell it was an octagon barrel until you picked it up. The magazine tube was a stark contrast; very little in the way of polishing. It appeared as though it was spun up with some 80 or 120 grit paper and then into the tank. I wouldn't give $500 for one, let alone the $850 before tax that was on it. I've always liked their rimfire models, and thought they were appropriately priced. The centerfires leave much to be desired imo for what they're asking for them.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,832
Messages
2,204,441
Members
79,157
Latest member
Bud1029
Back
Top