Since it is time to spin on a new barrel, I thought this would be a good time to take a look at some of the new temperature insensitive, copper fouling reducing powders to fuel my FTR 308 rifle. I added a couple inches to this barrel this time, making it 28", since I had the weight to spare. I am planning to jump on the 200 gn bullet band wagon, either Berger or Sierra, still haven't decided but had the chamber throated such to accept them.
So, now to the powder discussion. I am considering the new IMR 4166, but I am concerned with it being a faster burn rate than the Varget I have been using and the peak pressure burning out before the end of the 28" tube. Then there is CFE 223, which charts out a little slower than Varget, which should then utilize more of the new tube for its pressure curve. Then I know of some who run IMR 4350 in longer tubes, 30", so I was also considering the new IMR 4451 to push this new heavy-weight.
So many powder choices, I just thought I would start a friendly discussion so that people can voice their choices and/or thoughts regarding some of the new powders available. I will ultimately pick a pound of each to try, but I really hadn't seen too much discussion one way or the other on these new offerings specifically with the heavies. There is load data available for all but the IMR 4451 for the 308 with the 200, but there is data for IMR 4350 with the 190 and the 200 which is what the IMR 4451 supposed to emulate.
I know I could just take the simple way out and continue to use Varget, but with supplies what they are I thought I would consider some of the others. Plus if it means I have to spend less time cleaning copper fouling out by choosing one of these new fangled powders, all the better.
Keep it civil guys...
So, now to the powder discussion. I am considering the new IMR 4166, but I am concerned with it being a faster burn rate than the Varget I have been using and the peak pressure burning out before the end of the 28" tube. Then there is CFE 223, which charts out a little slower than Varget, which should then utilize more of the new tube for its pressure curve. Then I know of some who run IMR 4350 in longer tubes, 30", so I was also considering the new IMR 4451 to push this new heavy-weight.
So many powder choices, I just thought I would start a friendly discussion so that people can voice their choices and/or thoughts regarding some of the new powders available. I will ultimately pick a pound of each to try, but I really hadn't seen too much discussion one way or the other on these new offerings specifically with the heavies. There is load data available for all but the IMR 4451 for the 308 with the 200, but there is data for IMR 4350 with the 190 and the 200 which is what the IMR 4451 supposed to emulate.
I know I could just take the simple way out and continue to use Varget, but with supplies what they are I thought I would consider some of the others. Plus if it means I have to spend less time cleaning copper fouling out by choosing one of these new fangled powders, all the better.
Keep it civil guys...