Can’t modify a pin to make a footprint bigger. Probably have to machine a new pin to start, with a likely mod to the bolt nose, I’d guess.
Tommy, is this the pin that also incorporates “adjustable” ignition ?
I’ll see if PT&G will sell an unground pin.
Be careful, My guess is this looks far wider than a simple unground pin, it appears double wide.
The new footprint seems to require more metal than is presently available.
Time will tell.
Yeah it looks like that. So my thought was now I have a vertical strike across the primer/rim. If the strike was horizontal across twice as much of the primer compound seems like more primer compound would be ignited.
Not exactly the DiOrio shape but maybe twice the primer contact and not wasted energy on the rim just by turning the striker 90 degrees.
I ordered a couple last year, seemed too short to try anything much different. Called them to ask if I could buy some not sharpened. No dice," take or send them back". I took my two broke ones and replaced the pins myself. Did not make any that resembled the one it the pic above. Made one round and another 1/2 moon.I’ll see if PT&G will sell an unground pin.
Disagree.
The additional impact force required to cause that much footprint to crimp deeply enough is enough to cause issues on it’s own.
A guy needs plenty of ignition, but 6 & 12 with conventional impact area sounds like a better option to me.
I’ll follow along to see if I am wrong.
Why would changing the impact orientation require a different force/spring rate? for example if I reground the pin tip to be on the horizontal plain why would it require more force to get the same impact as in this case sample
View attachment 1134565
Why would changing the impact orientation require a different force/spring rate? for example if I reground the pin tip to be on the horizontal plain why would it require more force to get the same impact as in this case sample
View attachment 1134565