I am just guessing... but the popularity of the Dasher was from the shooter's ability to spot their own shots. It was "enough gun" and accurate, so many PRS folks adopted it and the trend was strong based on the number of folks using it.
Along with this trend, came many feed difficulties that plague the cartridge in repeaters where the issue costs points in time stress stages. This led to solving the feed problem with modifications to the magazines and also led to the GT design for it's length and smoother feeding.
If a BR (improved) case is used in a repeater, it requires coordinating the magazine follower, lips, feed ramps, etc., in order to prevent feed problems.
I'm already running a BRA from AICS mags.
Time of flight, energy wind drift, recoil, trajectory, bullet splash etc, on paper, comes out to be about a wash when you're talking 103-109s in the 2900 range and 85-90s in a 22 flavor at 3000ish.
I feel like if a 22 (br, bra, dasher etc) set a couple long range BR records tomorrow, the PRS guys would be screwing on barrels by the end of the week lol.
I've learned quick that PRS is a lot of monkey see monkey do..some for good reason....some for maybe no reason. Same with the gear they run. It's heavily skewed by sponsored shooters and sponsors that support prize tables and matches.
Give the top 20 PRS Shooters a mid end scope, a m700 that shoots half MOA and a stock/chassis they are comfortable with...in 22br or 284 or 25x47 or whatever flavor and they'll still very likely win. And everyone else will be shooting what they are shooting.
I'm no competitor. Mostly just due to time. I do a bit of observing though and I get to see the inner behind the scenes stuff.
I'm curious enough that I just might have a 22BRA spun up. I have an action sitting idle. If it "doesn't work" it'll make a wicked woodchuck barrel. But I have a hunch it'll work just fine for ME.
Thats the big thing I do see in PRS. What works for one guy might not work for another. Especially when it comes to glass, stocks/chassis, etc.