• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Misunderstood headspace setting/measurement

I posted my concerns about my new Redding body dies some time ago.

I was reading shoulder bumps os more than .005 and still getting dents on my shoulders.

I apologise and admit that I was measuring the wrong thing. What it turned out to be was powder granules in the chamber left by a long seated - unprimed but powder loaded cartridge which pulled out when I extracted it.

I was following my course of operations and got distracted.

The dents on shoulders were caused by stray granules of powder not lube.

So sorry if my defificient reloading practices led looks on wrong path.

I now clean chamber more carefully than bore.
Sorry and good luck.
-Eric
FYI lots of clean and well sized brass through rifle now. No negative feedback on Redding Body Dies from me!
 
No negative feedback on Redding Body Dies from me!

I clean my dies with a towel on a dowel. Back when the Redding Body die was 'the die' I called Redding. I wanted to know how they did it, how was it possible to size the body of the case with total disregard for the shoulder?

F. Guffey
 
Keep in mind that any powder granules left in the chamber will give you an incorrect read in terms of headspace but even though that would cause you to over bump your shoulders with your Redding body die, it still should not cause dents on your case shoulders. That is still likely caused by too much lube. Sometimes there is more than one problem at play…
 
Good post.

I got turned onto to using the two step sizing method, per article by German Salazar, last year. It was told to me here by Boyd Allen, and is the most significant reloading pearl I've found since getting into reloading two years back.

I use the Redding body die to bump shoulders back and neck size with Lee collet, then seat with Forster BR. Very concentric ammo and my AR15 w/Krieger shot a 0.172" bug hole and newly acquired Ruger Precision 6.5 CM shot a 0.161". Both are solid 1/2 moa or better rifles using this simple and affordable method.

Point is, I love Redding body dies. And Boyd Allen. Don't take that the wrong way. Hah. But it works and my targets and 21st Century concentricity gauge tell the truth. Great stuff.

Dan
 
fguffey said:
Back when the Redding Body die was 'the die' I called Redding. I wanted to know how they did it, how was it possible to size the body of the case with total disregard for the shoulder?

I'd have loved to have seen their faces when you asked them that.

In the context of a body die, "body" includes the shoulder. When you seat a bullet to the base of the neck, then fill the case to 100% load density, you've filled the "body", not "body and shoulder".
 
Danattherock said:
I use the Redding body die to bump shoulders back and neck size with Lee collet, then seat with Forster BR. Very concentric

Dan,

What's the thinking behind Lee collet vs Redding bushing neck die, and how much does that contribute to the accuracy, in your opinion?

Thinking ahead, I'm guessing once the shoulder is set, pushing a bushing onto the neck wants to upset the shoulder, compared to the "squeeze" from the collet?

I know one thing, last night I discovered how out of spec most Redding bushings are. I had wondered why some neck ODs were coming out .268 to .269 from a ".270" bushing. My pin gages revealed that bushing is actually .268. I mean, a whole .002" tolerance? Sheesh.
 
brians356 said:
Danattherock said:
I use the Redding body die to bump shoulders back and neck size with Lee collet, then seat with Forster BR. Very concentric

Dan,

What's the thinking behind Lee collet vs Redding bushing neck, and how much does that contribute to the accuracy, in your opinion?

Thinking ahead, I'm guessing once the shoulder is set, pushing a bushing onto the neck wants to upset the shoulder, compared to the "squeeze" from the collet?

I know one thing, last night I discovered how out of spec most Redding bushings are. I had wondered why some neck ODs were coming out .268 to .269 from a ".270" bushing. My pin gages revealed that bushing is actually .268. I mean, a whole .002" tolerance? Sheesh.
"pushing a bushing onto the neck wants to upset the shoulder" No.
 
jlow said:
brians356 said:
Danattherock said:
I use the Redding body die to bump shoulders back and neck size with Lee collet, then seat with Forster BR. Very concentric

Dan,

What's the thinking behind Lee collet vs Redding bushing neck, and how much does that contribute to the accuracy, in your opinion?

Thinking ahead, I'm guessing once the shoulder is set, pushing a bushing onto the neck wants to upset the shoulder, compared to the "squeeze" from the collet?

I know one thing, last night I discovered how out of spec most Redding bushings are. I had wondered why some neck ODs were coming out .268 to .269 from a ".270" bushing. My pin gages revealed that bushing is actually .268. I mean, a whole .002" tolerance? Sheesh.
"pushing a bushing onto the neck wants to upset the shoulder" No.

Fair enough. But it may apply more setback pressure onto the shoulder than a Lee collet die - however insignificant it may be - I don't know. Anyway, I would like Dan's thoughts, since he uses the collet die. (Myself, I use Redding body and bushing neck dies, so if I thought that was messing with the shoulder, it'd not be smart of me, would it?)
 
brians356 said:
jlow said:
brians356 said:
Danattherock said:
I use the Redding body die to bump shoulders back and neck size with Lee collet, then seat with Forster BR. Very concentric

Dan,

What's the thinking behind Lee collet vs Redding bushing neck, and how much does that contribute to the accuracy, in your opinion?

Thinking ahead, I'm guessing once the shoulder is set, pushing a bushing onto the neck wants to upset the shoulder, compared to the "squeeze" from the collet?

I know one thing, last night I discovered how out of spec most Redding bushings are. I had wondered why some neck ODs were coming out .268 to .269 from a ".270" bushing. My pin gages revealed that bushing is actually .268. I mean, a whole .002" tolerance? Sheesh.
"pushing a bushing onto the neck wants to upset the shoulder" No.

Fair enough. But it may apply more setback pressure onto the shoulder than a Lee collet die - however insignificant it may be - I don't know. Anyway, I would like Dan's thoughts, since he uses the collet die. (Myself, I use Redding body and bushing neck dies, so if I thought that was messing with the shoulder, it'd not be smart of me, would it?)
You can certainly get Dan's thoughts, but for a fact, I use LCD and have asked the same question in the past, and so have measured it before and after, thus the reason why I can give a answer - it's not a guess.
 
jlow said:
brians356 said:
jlow said:
brians356 said:
Danattherock said:
I use the Redding body die to bump shoulders back and neck size with Lee collet, then seat with Forster BR. Very concentric

Dan,

What's the thinking behind Lee collet vs Redding bushing neck, and how much does that contribute to the accuracy, in your opinion?

Thinking ahead, I'm guessing once the shoulder is set, pushing a bushing onto the neck wants to upset the shoulder, compared to the "squeeze" from the collet?

I know one thing, last night I discovered how out of spec most Redding bushings are. I had wondered why some neck ODs were coming out .268 to .269 from a ".270" bushing. My pin gages revealed that bushing is actually .268. I mean, a whole .002" tolerance? Sheesh.
"pushing a bushing onto the neck wants to upset the shoulder" No.

Fair enough. But it may apply more setback pressure onto the shoulder than a Lee collet die - however insignificant it may be - I don't know. Anyway, I would like Dan's thoughts, since he uses the collet die. (Myself, I use Redding body and bushing neck dies, so if I thought that was messing with the shoulder, it'd not be smart of me, would it?)
You can certainly get Dan's thoughts, but for a fact, I use LCD and have asked the same question in the past, and so have measured it before and after, thus the reason why I can give a answer - it's not a guess.

I hope you understood my question to Dan, but I'll rephrase: Does he use the LCD because it affects shoulder less than a bushing die?
 
Brian, I use the Lee neck collet die in conjunction with a Redding body die in an effort to emulate what to my knowledge was first discussed by German Salazar's article regarding the two step sizing process. Boyd Allen here spoke with me about it at great length and I gave it a try.

It was attempted in an effort to reduce runout and works tremendously well. At the time all my OCD was wide open and I had a long check list I called a reloading routine. I've since one by one whittled down the list. The Lee mandrel and collet system size the neck without many other untoward effects on the case, neck being yanked on by expander ball, shoulders being pulled, etc.

Others could argue for or against it more eloquently than myself, I just know it works. I also know that many criticisms of the Lee neck collet die are because most folks are overdoing it. It's a light and delicate action, and that's what my press handle feels like. Don't take much. Search for article by Valentine, how to use Lee neck collet die. Great read, should come in box with the die.

Originally an experiment on 223 rounds for an AR15 w/Krieger. And same exact setup employed in the last few weeks working up 139 Scenar load for my new Ruger Precision 6.5 creedmoor I bought for PRS and similar events. Both rifles are solid 1/2" guns and runout is so negligible I don't even check much these days. The needle on my 21st Century concentricity gauge just quivers often, or reads 2-3 thou.

Keep in mind, I don't turn necks either. Nor do I weight sort to any major degree, debur flash holes, or even trim unless I see lots of variation on new brass. Most neck or FS dies will compress case neck and irregularities in neck wall thickness will be placed internally after sizing. The Lee collet is compressing on a mandrel, and in such any neck wall thickness variation should to my way of thinking remain external after neck sizing. Perhaps this has less ill effects on varying seating tension associated with using non turned necks.

Again, others could offer more insights perhaps. I have more of a working knowledge of this system, and don't get into theory, what ifs, and whys at this point. That's where I was when Boyd filled my ear last year. And thank God for that phone call. Now I focus more on shooting and cranking out the best ammo I can without suffering from paralysis from analysis.

I loaded 165 6.5 creedmoor rounds today for upcoming 1000 yard event and a long range class tomorrow. I sized the unprepared Hornady once fired brass with Redding body bumping shoulders back 2 thou from fireformed dimension. I ran them through Lee neck collet. I champher/debur untrimmed cases on my RCBS case prep station. About an hour and a half in garage, then I was back inside with my family.

Sat in house with wife watching TV show while hand priming. Then sat down at kitchen table where both my Chargemaster 1500's were throwing charges in tandem. Then seated projectiles using Forster BR seating die.

Afterwards I put a black ring on sides of cases with sharpee while spinning on 21st century gauge so I can get my brass back during matches. 3-4 hours total, not including tumbler getting lube off after sizing while wife and I went out to lunch. Before I spoke with Boyd Allen last year I would have spent two days loading 165 match grade rounds.

It can be as simple or complicated as you want it of course. I've got 1/2 MOA out of inexpensive factory rifles on two occasions now using a $35 body die, $25 Lee die, and a $75 Forster seater. My ability, along with my rifles ability to realize my reloading measures, all factor into my method.

If shooting Benchrest, I would be filling cases with water to volume test, weighing primers, neck turning, and throwing powder on a Prametheus or whatever. The targets and the 21st Century spinner tell the story. I shot 0.172" with 223 and 0.161" with 6.5 creedmoor since employing this method. In previous 25 years of recreational shooting I had ZERO bughole groups.

Just remember a large portion of the 20+ step reloading routines you see here are a reflection of people's personality. I encourage you to test the steps, groups with and without factor X (insert flash hole debur, weight sorting cases within a grain, etc) and see what effect, if any, you see on your groups. That's where the truth lies, which I concede will vary for each of us.

PM me if you have any specific questions. I'm new to reloading but happy to share what little I know.


http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/02/tips-for-using-lee-collet-dies/


Dan



Here's a must read...



Using The Lee Collet Die.


I started using Lee collet dies when they first came on the market and have found that they are very good for the purposes for which they were designed .
I have found that there is a lack of understanding of how to use the die properly and as a result people fail to see the advantages that the die can deliver over standard neck sizing dies.
This is not the fault of the product , it is just a lack of understanding of how the die works and what it will feel like when you operate the press correctly.
Standard dies use a neck expanding ball on the decapping rod and size by extruding the neck through a hole and then drag the expander ball back through the inside neck.
The collet die achieves neck sizing by using a split collet to squeeze the outside of the case neck onto a central mandrel which has the decapping pin in it’s base .
One advantage is that there is no stretching or drawing action on the brass.
The inside neck diameter is controlled by the diameter of the mandrel and to some extent by the amount of adjustment of the die and the pressure applied to the press .
This results in less misalignment than can occur in standard dies because of any uneven neck wall thickness in the cases .
Cases will last longer in the neck area and require less trimming. If cases have very uneven neck wall thickness then this can cause problems for the collet die they definitely work smoother and more accurately with neck turned cases but it is not essential.
When you first receive the die unscrew the top cap and pull it apart check that everything is there also that the splits in the collet have nothing stuck in them then inspect the tapered surface on the top end of the collet and the internal taper of the insert to make sure there are no metal burs that might cause it to jamb.
Next get some good quality high pressure grease and put a smear onto the tapered surface of the collet .
Put it back together and screw it into the press just a few threads for now . The best type of press for this die is a press of moderate compound leverage that travels over centre .
Over centre means that when the ram reaches its full travel up it will stop and come back down a tiny amount even though the movement on the handle is continued through to the stop .
eg. is an RCBS Rockchucker.
This arrangement gives the best feel for a collet die sizing operation.
Place the shell holder in the ram and bring the ram up to full height then screw the die down until the collet skirt just touches on the shell holder , then lower the ram .
Take a case to be sized that has a clean neck inside and out and the mouth chamfered and place it in the shell holder.
Raise the ram gently feeling for resistance if none , lower the ram.
Screw the die down a bit at a time .
If you get lock up ( ram stops before going over centre) before the correct position is found then back it off and make sure the collet is loose and not jammed up in the die before continuing then raise the ram feeling for any resistance , keep repeating this until you feel the press handle resist against the case neck just at the top of the stroke as the press goes over centre and the handle kinder locks in place .
This takes much less force than a standard die and most people don’t believe any sizing has taken place .
Take the case out and try a projectile of the correct caliber to see how much sizing has taken place.
If it’s still too loose adjust the die down one eighth of a turn lock it finger tight only and try again .
Once the die is near the correct sizing position it takes very little movement of the die to achieve changes in neck seating tension .
This is where most people come undone , they move the die up and down too much and it either locks up or doesn’t size at all .
It will still size a case locking it up but you have no control over how much pressure is applied and some people lean on the press handle to the point of damaging the die. A press like the RCBS Rockchucker , that goes over centre each time gives you a definite stopping point for the ram and the pressure that you apply .
There is a small sweet spot for correct collet die adjustment and you must find it , once found , how sweet it is ! Advantages : With a press that travels over centre it is possible to adjust the neck seating tension within a very limited zone. No lubricant is normally required on the case necks during sizing .

If you still cant get enough neck tension to hold the bullet properly for a particular purpose then you will have to polish down the mandrel.
Be careful poilishing the mandrel down and only do it a bit at a time as a few thou can be removed pretty quickly if you overdo it.
You can't get extra neck tension by just applying more force. The amount of adjustment around the sweet spot is very limited and almost not noticable without carrying out tests.
For example , to go from a .001 neck tension to a .002 or .003 neck tension you would be talking about polishing down the mandrel.

There are some other advantages but I will leave you the pleasure of discovering them .
One disadvantage that I have found with the collet die is that it needs good vertical alignment of the case as it enters the die or case damage may result so go slowly.
Also some cases with a very thick internal base can cause problems with the mandrel coming in contact with the internal base before the sizing stroke is finished.
If pressure is continued the mandrel can push up against the top cap and cause damage . If you are getting lock up and cant get the right sizing sweet spot, then check that the mandrel is not too long for the case you can place a washer over the case and onto the shell holder and size down on that.
It will reduce the length of neck sized and give the mandrel more clearance. If it sizes Ok after adding the washer then the mandrel could be hitting the base.
This is not a usually problem once you learn how to use them .
The harder the brass is the more spring back it will have so very hard brass will exhibit less sizing than soft brass because it will spring away from the mandrel more. If this is happening to excess then use new cases or anneal the necks.
Freshly annealed brass can drag on the mandrel a bit in certain cases because it will spring back less and result in a tighter size diameter.
I have experienced it. I always use some dry lube on the inside and outside if I get any draging effect . Normally you dont need lube.
I make up a special batch 1/3 Fine Moly powder. 1/3 Pure graphite. 1/3 Aluminiumised lock graphite. Rub your fingers around the neck and It sticks very well to the necks by just dipping it in and out and tapping it to clear the inside neck . After a few cases it coats up the mandrel .
Other dry lubricants would work also.
Use the same process for normal neck sizing also.

I noticed a definite improvement in the accuracy of my 22-250Rem. as soon as I started using a Lee collet die instead of my original standard neck die.
Readers are encouraged to utilise the benefits of responsible reloading at all times. Although the author has taken care in the writing of these articles no responsibility can be taken by the author or publisher as a result of the use of this information.
John Valentine. © 21/01/2002.
*****
 
Danattherock said:
The Lee mandrel and collet system size the neck without many other untoward effects on the case, neck being yanked on by expander ball, shoulders being pulled, etc.

Thanks. Suppose the expander ball was omitted from a bushing neck die. Do you feel that could have untoward effects on the case (in particular the shoulder)?
 
I'm not familiar with the bushing dies, but have no doubt expander balls are bad juju. I tried and tested, with 21 st Century Concentricity gauge varying my technique, using smidge of imperial, dry mica inside necks, carbide expander, etc.. Nothing worked remotely as well as switching to the two step sizing process. Redding body die to bump shoulders slightly, with aid of Hornady headspace gauge. And neck sizing with Lee collet, and seating with inline Forster. Just a great combo.

Dan
 
Thanks. Suppose the expander ball was omitted from a bushing neck die. Do you feel that could have untoward effects on the case (in particular the shoulder)?

I have ask the question before; How would a reloader measure the case length from the shoulder to the case head. Then there is that other part, as the case is fired and sized it works hardens. I would think a reloader would be able to determine a cases ability to resist sizing by the difficulty they had when the sizing plug is pulled though the neck when the ram is lowered.

F. Guffey
 
fguffey said:
I have ask the question before; How would a reloader measure the case length from the shoulder to the case head.

I could tell you, but I don't think you really want to know.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
166,828
Messages
2,223,959
Members
79,867
Latest member
Steve1984
Back
Top