• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

measuring wall thickness

nilebartram

Silver $$ Contributor
I did a search and it did not answer my question.. I have 3 Mitutoyo micrometers. I get different reading from the three. They all zero perfectly. I am trying to get a .011" wall thickness. One micrometer is .0123, two is .013, last is .0115. One micrometer is a ball type, the others are the one with inter changeable stem. I should mention. I do micrometer hold . Can you please advise. nilebartram
 
It takes years of practice and the correct hold as to not heat up the mic. The speed at which you close the anvil even matters. Best way to learn is to get a good standard like a certified .250/.500 gage block and practice. In the meantime you can get an indicating mic and let it close itself to maybe get a more consistent reading. Another method would be to seat a bullet and measure the outside with your calipers. As long as youre using a good turning tool thatll be just fine, theres no need to measure to the tenths all you need is enough clearance. A weighted mic stand will help if you still want to use a mic. If you hold it by hand this is the most consistent hold pictured here3AC2B797-1187-444C-8BC5-7BB36BE6A170.jpeg
 
Bear in mind that neck thickness is not going to be perfectly consistent around the circumference of the case neck. If, for instance, you mic the neck at one spot... then rotate the neck 90 degrees and take another reading... then rotate another 90 degrees for a third reading... and finally rotate one more 90 degrees for a fourth reading... you'll almost certainly see different numbers.

Understanding those samples - min, max, average, and standard deviation - can give great insight into the qualities of a particular piece of brass, a lot of brass, and how different headstamps compare.

Measuring short-neck cartridges also brings its own caution... as measuring slightly too deep into the neck such that the shoulder of the case abuts even an infinitesimal amount into the mic face/anvil intersection will throw the measurement off.

Mitutoyo makes good stuff. Use the one with the ball.
 
Do they measure the same on a flat shim or feeler gauge?

Are they the same diameter on the inside ball?

One thing is sure: using a pin style stem means that any distortion in the neck wall will show a larger reading. A ball stem will touch at a point and largely ignore geometric imperfections.

what you need is a good indication of which will give you a good loaded round diameter. I would take one piece, skim to 90% cleanup, mic it with all three neck mics, then mic a bullet to the .0001 and seat it and measure the finished neck. Now you can assess which is giving you the most indicative measurement.
 
I get different reading from the three.
I would help if you told us what the readings are.
Is it thickness at same datums? Variance around necks?
And having different anvils doesn't help with comparison.

Forget a pin anvil for this. You need a point/ball contact
 
I am forming a 20 vartarg with .223 brass. It is a winter project. Some people think I am nuts, but 221 fireball is getting harder to find. I have 221 fireball brass and I have to turn it also. So I am learning to turn on the .223 brass. My chamber is .226, so I figure my brass has to be turn to .011, the bullet is .204, equals .226. I thought the expander will help uniform the brass. I do notice when I turn the neck and measure you get a different reading. When I think I have turn the brass and measure the neck and it is .011 and I seat a bullet in the empty brass, it measures .228, so the neck must be really .012. Really frustrating.
 
Measuring the neck wall is to me just the beginning step. I seat the bullet I intend to use, the loaded round at the neck measured with a micrometer in relationship to the neck clearance is what I go by.
 
For now just forget measuring wall thickness or what a bullet measures. Measure simply over a loaded round and give yourself clearance. You dont need to measure to the tenth right now just use calipers and get clearance. No math involved except figuring out which bushings to buy. If a loaded round doesnt fit your standards, adjust the tool, turn another one and measure again. It makes absolutely zero difference if your neck is .011 or .0113
 
I have a mic just like that. It zeros fine but the larger it measures the more error it reads. I used a set of gauge blocks to check it one day. At 010" it is off about 0005", at 050" its over 001" off.

You need a good gauge block to check it with like Dusty said.

Joe
 
In early life I've used cheap tools, harbor freight & stuff,, but have never seen calipers off by a full thou, much less a micrometer. This is likely a measuring method issue.
 
It takes years of practice and the correct hold as to not heat up the mic. The speed at which you close the anvil even matters. Best way to learn is to get a good standard like a certified .250/.500 gage block and practice. In the meantime you can get an indicating mic and let it close itself to maybe get a more consistent reading. Another method would be to seat a bullet and measure the outside with your calipers. As long as youre using a good turning tool thatll be just fine, theres no need to measure to the tenths all you need is enough clearance. A weighted mic stand will help if you still want to use a mic. If you hold it by hand this is the most consistent hold pictured hereView attachment 1228433
Dusty you might want to moisturize too, just saying. lol lol:p
 
Keep in mind, when using a ball micrometer with a flat spindle, such as the Mitutoyo shown in post #3, the large area being contacted by the flat spindle can have an affect on the actual measurement. This is less true with a properly turned neck, but there are all sorts of irregularities in the OD of a factory neck that can throw you off. Keep in mind, we are dealing with increments of less than .001 inch.

Since you are trying to measure one spot, I modified this old set of tubing mic’s so the spindle and anvil just contact one small spot. I get more consistent readings in smaller diameters. image.jpgthan I do with my regular ball mics.
 
Last edited:

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,160
Messages
2,190,747
Members
78,721
Latest member
BJT20
Back
Top