MDT stocks for F-class?

[Daimon]

Has anyone tried MDT (ACC or ESS) stocks for fclass FTR shooting? I know they are dedicated PRS stocks but I don't want pure fclass rifle - I'd like something which can shoot both fclass FTR and PRS (of course with different bipods and no brake). Would it be much worse than dedicated FTR stock?

 

[MikeMcCasland]

Scroll down about 1/4 page on this link. Although uncommon, an MPA chassis rig just won LR FTR Nationals.

http://forum.accurateshooter.com/threads/2019-fclass-long-range-scores.3987903/page-4


Edited for accuracy.

 

[Down South]

Scroll down about 1/4 page on this link. Although uncommon, an MDT chassis rig just won LR FTR Nationals.

http://forum.accurateshooter.com/threads/2019-fclass-long-range-scores.3987903/page-4

The chassis I shot at Nationals is a MPA (Hybrid model) chassis not a MDT chassis. I don't know anything about the MDT chassis but I definitely like the MPA chassis.

 

[MikeMcCasland]

The chassis I shot at Nationals is a MPA (Hybrid model) chassis not a MDT chassis. I don't know anything about the MDT chassis but I definitely like the MPA chassis.

My bad...I confuse them sometimes.

 

[Down South]

My bad...I confuse them sometimes.

No worries........

 

[Dud]

I have an MPA, an MDT LSS and I'm waiting on an ARC Xylo.

The MPA is nice but I think my Arca rail is a bit wide, my Cyke Pod barely grips the dovetail. Beside that, lots of features but also it's 6061 and Cerakote.

My MDT LSS is the bottom of the line, probably not representative of better MDT chassis, a little bit blockier than my MPA, it had some burrs they Cerakoated over and some of the Cerakote has even worn away from getting moved around my work area a bit. It's 6061 too.

The ARC Xylo is 7075 and hard coat anodized with a lot of features comparable to the MPA but possibly more ergonomic, I'm looking forward to it. I hope it doesn't disappoint.

Other options are KRG and XLR. There are more I'm sure.

I can't say I'm really impressed with my MDT but it was a $200 clearance special and they have since released a Gen 2 product.

Try to get your hands on one before you buy to see if you think it will work for you.

 

[D.Stone]

The MDT ACC wouldn't be a bad choice for F-TR. Same goes for the MPA Chassis. They are ergonomically similar to a conventional prone stock...i.e vertical pistol grip, 3 way adjustable butt-plate, bag rider, and place the pistol grip close to the bore-axis.

The owner of MPA sometimes shoots mid-range F Class at the CMP Talladega range, and I think he has won a few matches with his chassis as well.

 

[willbas]

I like my MPA Hybrid

 

[jsthntn247]

The chassis I shot at Nationals is a MPA (Hybrid model) chassis not a MDT chassis. I don't know anything about the MDT chassis but I definitely like the MPA chassis.

Think they needed to check your brass. Had to have been a creedmoor in that chasis.

 

[memilanuk]

The MPA and KRG chassis' have options for extended/lowered spigot mounting points to lower the CG as well as getting the bipod further out when desired. The MDT has a pretty long fore-end, which addresses the latter... not sure if there is an option for any kind of spigot mount to lower things? MDT has been pretty responsive to customer needs, so if there isn't one, maybe they'll make one as an option?

 

[BP1]

My bad...I confuse them sometimes.

I tried that reply with a police officer once over a stop sign and a yield sign..it didn’t work..