Have you contacted anyone about this?I have a 10-60 HM that just doesn’t live up to expectations. Just not anywhere as clear as my NF Comps or Kayles.
Thanks! I'll do that. Really not in the market at the moment but I would love to change 2 rifles over to that reticle. Frankly, while I appreciate great glass, I'm not disappointed in my old nf br or leupy comp. I do have a March 40x on my primary rifle that has the lr reticle. The glass is nothing to Wright home about but is sufficient. I don't think we need GREAT glass in Sr br but very good certainly is very nice tooYou might be surprised. I would suggest you go to the Marchscopes.com website, ask them the question at About Us=>Contact us. The worst that can happen is they say no.
I think that Brud has a March with the LR reticle for sale, might check with him.Thanks! I'll do that. Really not in the market at the moment but I would love to change 2 rifles over to that reticle. Frankly, while I appreciate great glass, I'm not disappointed in my old nf br or leupy comp. I do have a March 40x on my primary rifle that has the lr reticle. The glass is nothing to Wright home about but is sufficient. I don't think we need GREAT glass in Sr br but very good certainly is very nice too
This exactly.I guess it is all about the adventure and journey of discovery!!
Yes. See later textHave you contacted anyone about this?
Both of which are excellent and my eyes would agree...but the HM should be very close, either wayI have a 10-60 HM that just doesn’t live up to expectations. Just not anywhere as clear as my NF Comps or Kayles.
You know Mike that I have 4 NF competitions, just got a HM 10-60 but wrong reticle I think, after the season is over I'll put it on one and see, I've been told the NF is brighter BUT not by much AND the gentleman that I spoke with preferred the HM stating he could see through the mirage better, I don't know.Both of which are excellent and my eyes would agree...but the HM should be very close, either way
I think at some point, we're splitting very fine hairs and there is no right or wrong answer, depending on our own eyes, individually. All three are VERY good, IME, though. I was a Kahles fan before a lot ever heard of them...the OLDEST scope maker in the WORLD! Then Swaro bought them out, jacked the prices...a LOT, and marketed them over here. They've always been great but they just are nowhere close to the same VALUE that they were back then. But...they didn't off anything for our game then, either.You know Mike that I have 4 NF competitions, just got a HM 10-60 but wrong reticle I think, after the season is over I'll put it on one and see, I've been told the NF is brighter BUT not by much AND the gentleman that I spoke with preferred the HM stating he could see through the mirage better, I don't know.
I would suggest you contact them again and explain your issue clearly. Tell them mounting the scope was not the issue.I have contacted customer service about the high master scope. They sent me some info on proper scope mounting! Such as how far from bells or turrets to place rings and ring screw torque. Nothing to address what I think is a problem on an expensive scope.
That's good information. Make sure you include that in the contact form for DEON.Have set and reset the reticle and it is very sharp on my 10-60X56 HM. Easy to adjust until no parallax present. When shooting at a 300 yard Benchrest target, the center dot is just not as visible(clear) as it is with my NF Comps or Kahles scopes on high power especially when mirage is present. Also seeing 6mm bullet holes in the target isn’t as easy as with my other scopes even with a rubber backer.