• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

M15, yes15. Anyone heard of it?

TAJ45

Silver $$ Contributor
Had a couple in on the w/e and he asked if I had never heard of one. He swore by golly that he fired one in the svc putting NAT0 308s through it. I asked if it had a carrying handle, he wasn't sure. He knew a M14, showed him my M1A but nothing became more definitive in his mind. He was 82nd Air Born in 70-71.
Nothing to fuss over, I just told him I had not heard of one. I Goog'd it and an M15 by Armalite was mentioned but not clearly whether 5.56 or 308.
Anyone? PS. He did associate it with the AF......Hmmm.not a big deal, just curious.
 
Armalite m15 is 5.56. I have a armalite m15a4 and an armalite AR10 in 243. Ar10 is 308 based and I'm pretty sure "ar10" is patented by armalite and no one else can label their rifles "AR10".
 
Internet source -

Stoner 63 Modular Weapons Systems



This weapon system came from legendary American arms designer Eugene Stoner, creator of the original Armalite AR-15 rifle, which was later adopted by the military as the M16. Stoner’s next project after leaving Armalite was a modular weapon system developed with Cadillac Gage: a 7.62×51 mm caliber weapon that could be configured as a rifle, carbine, or machine gun. When Stoner and his design team saw the growing popularity of the 5.56 x 45 mm caliber, they switched away from the heavier 7.62 mm round.

The Stoner 63 system featured a variety of different subassemblies, that enabled a variety of configurations. A full-size rifle, a compact carbine, even a solenoid-fired vehicle machine gun were available. But the most popular version of the Stoner 63 was the light machine gun. Special operations units like the SEALs and Marine Force Reconnaissance prized the 63’s light weight — it was 11 pounds lighter than the standard M60 machine gun. The weapon’s 5.56 mm caliber was also significantly more controllable than the heavier 7.62 rounds of the M60.

The Stoner 63 family got attention from the Marine Corps, which conducted testing with the various configurations from 1963 to 1967. It got positive reviews in boot camp training environments and performed well in limited combat trials. But the Army disagreed, with Army Weapons Command electing to stick with the M16.

While the SEALs had an appreciation for the weapon, its complicated assembly and fussy maintenance requirements meant that it would never see wide acceptance outside special operations circles. But its modular design was a revolutionary approach to small arms design, one that would ironically be best exemplified in improved versions of Stoner’s previous work on the AR-15. But even modern versions of the AR still don’t offer what the Stoner 63 did back in the 1960s.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Best description I found of the 63. Maybe this is what he meant or was getting two rifles mixed up?
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,783
Messages
2,203,310
Members
79,110
Latest member
miles813
Back
Top