• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Lows SD, bad group

Ar15 I built 1:8 16" barrel

Come up with this load 2 years ago and it seemed to shoot well.
New Lapua brass
Fed 205 primer
23.3g AR Comp
Barnes 70g tsx
Seated @ 1.852 B2OJ
The load shot well generally between 3/4 and 1 MOA. The average velocity ran around 2763 and stdev always right around the 10 to 12 mark for each shooting session. This rifling combination have killed several critters with no problem.

Fast forward to today I had seven rounds of that original load that I shot. SD of 7.7 EXsp of 22. Avj 2792fps. However the down range results were disastrous. Group was 2.25 MOA....

So what I'm getting at with a low SD and consistent speed should it not also group well? Or do I need to know refocus on seating depth???


Thanks for the help.

PGohil
WV
 
Ar15 I built 1:8 16" barrel

Come up with this load 2 years ago and it seemed to shoot well.
New Lapua brass
Fed 205 primer
23.3g AR Comp
Barnes 70g tsx
Seated @ 1.852 B2OJ
The load shot well generally between 3/4 and 1 MOA. The average velocity ran around 2763 and stdev always right around the 10 to 12 mark for each shooting session. This rifling combination have killed several critters with no problem.

Fast forward to today I had seven rounds of that original load that I shot. SD of 7.7 EXsp of 22. Avj 2792fps. However the down range results were disastrous. Group was 2.25 MOA....

So what I'm getting at with a low SD and consistent speed should it not also group well? Or do I need to know refocus on seating depth???


Thanks for the help.

PGohil
WV
I had the same kind of thing happen last September with my .308 RPR. I was using some AR-Comp pushing the new 177 SMK's and for a 5 round session I got an SD of 2.0 and and ES of 5, but the group ES was 1.196". This was for a set of OCW testing and this was the worst of them. Because I had some better loads, I never retested this load to see if it'd repeat. In your case, I'd suggest trying that load again and see if you get the same kind of result. What you got there might just be some kind of anomaly that's really hard to find what the cause is if it can't be duplicated.
 
Last edited:
The group was slightly taller than wide offset an inch to the right from POA in randomly distributed. Did not seem like a horizontal or vertical string predominantly.
I'm probably a hundred rounds after last good cleaning and have not seen excessive copper or carbon buildup.
 
I'm probably a hundred rounds after last good cleaning and have not seen excessive copper or carbon buildup.
Unless you already know this recipe and bbl will go that far and farther.... then this may be the sign to scrub her down and test again.

Sometimes, you can get away with even more rounds than this, and other times you only get about that much. I stopped trying to determine what makes one go twice as far versus the another, but trust the test results.

Folks I trust have been able to go incredible round counts without cleaning, but that has never worked well for me and for reference I have had many years worth of full automatics, prairie dog trips, Service Rifle, etc.. to fall back on for reference.

Much depends on how much experience a shooter has with troubleshooting when it comes to higher performance issues. When experimenting, I will often suggest keeping a reliable reference ammo that you either buy or make, but more importantly is a known performance standard for high performance guns. This takes many years worth of troubleshooting to judge when a troubleshooting investigations take a focus on the gun versus the ammo (versus the shooter...).
 
I believe that’s a hot load. 23.2 with 69s in my wylde chambered bolt gun went through brass
I agree, it must be pretty difficult to even fit that much. Max is shown for mag length at 20.9, but even if you seat it really long.....
1711901852621.png

And that 70 TSX is really long too.
 
I'm gonna start all over and see what results I get. This was the first cartridge I reloaded for 3 years ago. Lord knows I've learned a ton and do things a bit different now
 
Velocity variation has a randomness to it. We want to ascribe low velocity variation to a good group size, but testing very large samples suggests that the two are not related at short to medium range. At longer ranges, increased velocity variation will make groups taller, but your best bet is to ignore the velocity variation on small samples unless it is huge.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,908
Messages
2,206,177
Members
79,217
Latest member
NF1E
Back
Top