johara1 said:Maybe a rise in pressure with more neck tension? just a consideration …….. jim
Yep!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
johara1 said:Maybe a rise in pressure with more neck tension? just a consideration …….. jim
Understand and I am in no way criticizing, just the opposite. It is rare that we have a condition in which only one parameter is changed and we get such a dramatic result. In this case you have two small five shot groups separated by eight inches. I think you have an excellent opportunity to repeat the test, maybe even with more shots and see if this is repeatable. If so the next step would be for someone else to attempt to conduct a similar test to see if again there is a similar outcome. I am not sure exactly what we would do with the result but you never know when something like this will be useful down the road. Respectively, Clyde.RMulhern said:T-REX said:Interesting How many rounds fired? This is significant enough that it would be worth repeating the test to see if you get similar results. Also it would be interesting to see someone else with a similar set up repeat this test.
T-REX
I had ten rounds loaded....five cases with necks turned to .013" and five cases with NT at .012"! All ten rounds loaded one hour before I shot them. Both five shot knuckle sized groups with one group 8" above the first group fired.
I'm not 'quite' ignorant enough to believe that this is a static condition that would exist in all situations as the test is too limited for any conclusion thereof and I will test further as the weather allows. But....in the event with further testing since accuracy does not appear to suffer with knot sized groups being delivered at the before mentioned distance...the only correction that would be needed would be a change in elevation zero! Initially I commenced this endeavor to find out if there would be any significant change by tighter neck clearance betwixt the loaded round and neck wall and I haven't arrived at a conclusion at this time. I'm NOT convinced yet that it's neck tension because the five rounds fired with thinner neck walls shot the lowest!!
I made a correction in my first post as I typed the wrong dimension as to neck wall thickness!
OleFreak said:With a .012†neck wall thickness the case neck to chamber wall clearance is ~ .004†total so .002†on each side and probably enough so for a clean bullet release.
Then with neck wall thickness increased to .013†the case neck to chamber wall clearance is reduced to ~ .002†total so only .001†clearance on each side and now possibly impeding the bullet’s release to the point that there’s increased pressure so also increased velocity resulting in the eight inches higher impacts, ya reckon?
noload said:rmulhern, the groups at 800yds ....are those pigs knuckles or people knuckles , I amazed a 308 can shoot that good, especially 2 groups. Hell I'm ammazed any gun will shoot that good. I don't mean to be a wise guy but ..Maybe I'm missing something???
RMulhern said:OleFreak said:With a .012†neck wall thickness the case neck to chamber wall clearance is ~ .004†total so .002†on each side and probably enough so for a clean bullet release.
Then with neck wall thickness increased to .013†the case neck to chamber wall clearance is reduced to ~ .002†total so only .001†clearance on each side and now possibly impeding the bullet’s release to the point that there’s increased pressure so also increased velocity resulting in the eight inches higher impacts, ya reckon?
That's one of the things I'm attempting to find out! ;D ;D
noload said:rmulhern, the groups at 800yds ....are those pigs knuckles or people knuckles , I amazed a 308 can shoot that good, especially 2 groups. Hell I'm ammazed any gun will shoot that good. I don't mean to be a wise guy but ..Maybe I'm missing something???