the side focus on the sightrons is picky, my 36brd is much clearer than the 8x32 or 10x50 in the 1000 dollars class range I know nothing of the higher class sightrons that are in the 1500 to 2200 dollar class range, but I have never looked through a LCS scope ither so just keyboard talk for me but my next scope will be a LCS but I would rather have a NF 12x42x56 it trumps the sightron and loopy
Like any new product coming on the market,
before it's available there are plenty of keyboard
buyers with lots of chatter. Once the 45 Sightron
surfaced it seemed to fade very quickly.
IMHO for a fixed power 40 would be the limit
on bad condition days. LDS
The LCS has been referred to as a UPS scope because they have issues of holding point of impact. The new 45 power Sightron doesn't have that issue for a lot less money..... jim
I haven’t seen many test results on the Sightron. One has been around for almost a decade and probably the most used scope in short range benchrest and the other just came out this year. I’d say the jury is still out on the sightron. What is YOUR experience with both scopes?
The 45x45 ED just came out this year....... I had one LCS a 45 power it was ok but never shot great and it went down the road. The Sightron is on a rimfire right now it shoots good and will go down to 50 feet for indoor..... jim
I remember seeing where they were checked and the Sightron was rock solid..... jimI’d love to see actual test results with a scope checker and centerfire rifle with the sightron before saying it’s more likely to hold poa over a new LCS.
I have yet to see any.
I have a 45x45 Sightron and with the ED glass is a better scope than the Leopold.Just wondering if there is anymore information to be added to this post?