I have pretty much decided on a Leupold 35, 40, or 45 x 45 competition scope for my Remington 40X bench build. This gun (will have) an H-S Precision PSC100 smooth stock, a 40X .308 action, and a 20" barrel. I will do the majority of my shooting at 100 yards using a Sinclair Bench Rest Competition front w/ an Edgewood 3" reinforced bag and a MiniGator rear bag. (I like to include as many details as possible in my question posts even if some are inapplicable).
I can't decide between 35x, 40x, or 45x magnification on my scope. I think I am ASSuming there is a trade-off in eye relief and exit-pupil characteristics between the 3 models? If there's not, would there by any reason to not go with the 45 x 45? On the 45, will my eye have to be absolutely PERFECTLY on-axis with the scope to see anything? The strange thing is, looking at the specs between the 3 different model, I don't see anything different. Can this be?
(BTW, is "eye relief" or "exit pupil" the characteristic that describes how perfectly on-axis the eye must be to see properly through the scope?
I have a Zeiss Conquest scope that requires my eye to be in a VERY tiny window of space and quite frankly its not much fun to shoot at all.
I can't decide between 35x, 40x, or 45x magnification on my scope. I think I am ASSuming there is a trade-off in eye relief and exit-pupil characteristics between the 3 models? If there's not, would there by any reason to not go with the 45 x 45? On the 45, will my eye have to be absolutely PERFECTLY on-axis with the scope to see anything? The strange thing is, looking at the specs between the 3 different model, I don't see anything different. Can this be?
(BTW, is "eye relief" or "exit pupil" the characteristic that describes how perfectly on-axis the eye must be to see properly through the scope?
I have a Zeiss Conquest scope that requires my eye to be in a VERY tiny window of space and quite frankly its not much fun to shoot at all.