Was wondering the consensus on ladder testing. When your working up a new load, what are you concentrating on first, a low SD, ES, small group. Or do look for a low SD, ES, then start playing with seating depth to tighten up the groups.
The reason I ask, and I know it's been asked before, but I have gotten really low SD, ES, before, and had terrible groups. All at a single seating depth. Then I have had some really good groups, but the SD, ES were not that great.
Should I be looking at the SD ES first, getting the lowest I can find, then start seating the bullets to get the best groups, or looking for the lowest SD, ES and groups together as shot from a single seating depth? I usually use the latter to get my best loads, but was just wondering if anyone uses just lowest Standard Deviation, Extreme Spread numbers, then start loading up different seating depths, to get their best loads.
The reason I ask, and I know it's been asked before, but I have gotten really low SD, ES, before, and had terrible groups. All at a single seating depth. Then I have had some really good groups, but the SD, ES were not that great.
Should I be looking at the SD ES first, getting the lowest I can find, then start seating the bullets to get the best groups, or looking for the lowest SD, ES and groups together as shot from a single seating depth? I usually use the latter to get my best loads, but was just wondering if anyone uses just lowest Standard Deviation, Extreme Spread numbers, then start loading up different seating depths, to get their best loads.