I know that uniform cases in every aspect is the goal. But I have never had a piece of brass that required modifications of the primer pocket in any way. I dont use crimped brass. So because I have never, should I be checking and uniforming pockets for reasons other than functional reasons.
I'm curious as to which discipline you refer toIt depends on do you want to win or just shoot ?
Guess it would depend on what level of shooting you do.
I know that the amount of crush a primer gets effects the flame going through the flash hole. Getting a consistent ignition of the powder from the flash hole tends to affect the interior case pressure's consistency. If one doesn't have uniform primer pockets, there can be issues with inconsistent seating/crush of the primer. Some shooters, especially some competitive shooters, will go to extremes to get uniform pockets AND primer seating as part of getting a well tuned cartridge.
I don't grind on primer pockets and do well in br.
I have 30 firings on some 66mm.
All of the many short range group benchrest competitors that I know seat primers by feel, not to a specific depth. I have never seen any on target evidence that uniforming pockets enhances accuracy, even at the highest level. Even if the pockets are of uniform depth, primers are not. IMO there is a lot of untested assumption going on in this area.Guess it would depend on what level of shooting you do.
I know that the amount of crush a primer gets effects the flame going through the flash hole. Getting a consistent ignition of the powder from the flash hole tends to affect the interior case pressure's consistency. If one doesn't have uniform primer pockets, there can be issues with inconsistent seating/crush of the primer. Some shooters, especially some competitive shooters, will go to extremes to get uniform pockets AND primer seating as part of getting a well tuned cartridge.
I never said that it did. I still maintain that for most shooters it is a waste of time. Certainly, I agree that long range has different requirements, but the latest developments in that sport, glue-ins and doing some loading or load adjustment at the range, have come from short range haven't they? Have you seen any research on whether uniforming the best brass makes a difference for long range?the entire world does not revolve around short range br.
(the problem with asking a general question instead of a specific question.
the further the distance, the more attention to the details.)
I was hoping that one of the top shooters here had some test data, because they seem to test everything. If your weighing primers and sorting them, you just may have some primer pocket data.....I never said that it did. I still maintain that for most shooters it is a waste of time. Certainly, I agree that long range has different requirements, but the latest developments in that sport, glue-ins and doing some loading or load adjustment at the range, have come from short range haven't they? Have you seen any research on whether uniforming the best brass makes a difference for long range?
Well, I happen to set specific crush with primer seating.
Fed/Win/Rem at 2thou crush, CCI at 5thou, as standard.
I didn't go there because I wanted to, but because it makes a difference with hunting capacity cartridges.
My seating to crush accounts for varying primer heights (via indicated K&M).
I set pocket depths with Sinclair pocket tools, in hopes that striking distance would then vary only by primer height(minus crush) to pocket bottom.
Good to less good striking is a window way bigger than this, but it doesn't hurt provided I'm not taking much material from pockets.
I watch all fired primer appearances, and I want them all the same, barring 1st indication of problem.
What I do not do is mess with flash holes. Guess that makes me an outlier, but my testing showed either no improvements or worse performance in doing so.
I only inspect them, and toss off-center holed and pronounced burrs.
And I hold an eye tolerance for this much.