• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Is the Don Neilson Pumpkin still the state of the art?

I bought Pumpkin turners and they worked well. I sold mine and went with PMA. It was just a personal operational thing, I did not like how my case neck " disappeared " into the body of the Pumpkin when being cut. The Pumpkin is beautifully engineered and has an amazing fine adjustment. I just like the ergonomics of the PMA better and it adjusts just fine.

Regards
Rick
 
There was a 'Blueberry' neck turning tool recently but I don't see it offered any longer. It kinda looked like the pumpkin trimmer but don't know if it was similar in operation.
 
Last edited:
I know I could google this, and I might regret asking, but what is a Don Neilson Pumpkin?
Don Neilson made a neck turner that was a must have for turning necks 20'ish years ago. It was orange and was known as the pumpkin. It has a very fine adjustment capability and excellent precision.

With all the people making tools for shooting I would have thought someone would have come up with something good since the pumpkins are no longer made.

1724713517661.png
 
I never did a side-by-side review. However, both were easy to adjust and didn't drift. I would consider my neck turning to be done in pretty broad strokes.....My main reason for switching to the PMA was to be able to see the whole cutting operation. I knew PMA made quality equipment and was very pleased with the results.

Regards
Rick
 
Last edited:
@R.Morehouse

Do you find the adjustment and repeatability of the PMA to be as good as a pumpkin?
Steve,
I got my Pumpkin from Don at a super shoot at Deepcreek in Missoula MT maybe 10 years ago. It was extremely well made and precise, at about the same Time Pat sent me a PMA, I can’t remember now what it was but there was something I liked much better with Pats than I did Dons so I traded a forum member the pumpkin 4 or 5 years ago. I believe I liked the initial setup of the PMA better, it doesn’t matter there both well made precise, ergonomically good products.
Wayne
 
A five decimal digital ball mic....may help determine this. A standard ball mic is good for a paperweight.
A standard ball or tube micrometer reads to .ooo1 or better and doesn't require a battery. Anything beyond that would require a temperature controlled environment to matter. I own both, and yes the digital is easier to use, but a quality tubing micrometer is quite accurate.
 
A standard ball or tube micrometer reads to .ooo1 or better and doesn't require a battery. Anything beyond that would require a temperature controlled environment to matter. I own both, and yes the digital is easier to use, but a quality tubing micrometer is quite accurate.
I have 2 digital, 5 decimal mitutoyos myself. While ease of use is better. I don't find hitting the 5th decimal hard to achieve in my basement. Brass position is key. I am not sure I could go back to a 4 decimal as crazy as that sounds.
 
There was a 'Blueberry' neck turning tool recently but I don't see it offered any longer. It kinda looked like the pumpkin trimmer but don't know if it was similar in operation.
It is still on our website. It is exclusive to Bruno's.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,547
Messages
2,198,126
Members
78,961
Latest member
Nicklm
Back
Top