• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Is the Ballistic Coefficient Accurate?

Status
Not open for further replies.
How does your 146 grain 30 cal bullet compare in performance to a traditional boat tail bullet?

Am I reading your graph correctly is post#3 that shows the BC of a bullet eventually starting to decrease the faster it flies?
My 30 Cal bullets are only stable with a 1:8 twist so I'm shooting them from a 300 Blackout with really great results. They are marginally stable from a .308 Win and the wobble shows up as group spreading.

Both bullets leave the barrel at the same muzzle velocity (depending upon the powder load) but my bullets have such lower drag that they bleed off the energy much slower. I'm getting about 40% greater range based upon impact energy over a traditional BT of the same weight. Or increased impact energy at the same range.
 
Hi Dave,

One of the reasons that the "nerdy academic" side of ballistics is held in so little regard is that it is so difficult to translate the math into a solid initial drop table. I would like to see that change. When a pointy boattail is advertised as a G1 BC and then a shooter plugs that into a ballistic solver and gets garbage results, it implies that the math is wrong.

And yes, my bullets do not follow any of the standard profiles like the G1 or G7. I need to get y'all to start thinking about that and swallow the pill that these new bullets are the next step in rifle shooting.

Maybe I should put a drop table calculator on my website? One that uses drag curves instead of BC?
Maybe compare the drop and wind drift of your bullet up against a known LR bullet (ie 7mm 180g Berger LR Hybrid). That would get some folks to take notice. Personally, I love math. I’m a double major (Mech Eng and Math) and getting my kids interested in math has been harder than getting them to eat all their veggies, including the gross ones like cauliflower and broccoli. Some people love math and others find it more repulsive than the idea of a male Olympic champion parading around as a female (just a hypothetical here). lol
Dave
 
Last edited:
What is needed here is a verified side by side test. Your new bullet design against say three of the top bullets same Cal. and weight shot at 500 out of the same gun. Target always tells the truth!
^^^^^^^^ THIS. EXACTLY. PRECISELY. This is required to make folks stand up and take notice.
Dave
 
My 30 Cal bullets are only stable with a 1:8 twist so I'm shooting them from a 300 Blackout with really great results. They are marginally stable from a .308 Win and the wobble shows up as group spreading.

Both bullets leave the barrel at the same muzzle velocity (depending upon the powder load) but my bullets have such lower drag that they bleed off the energy much slower. I'm getting about 40% greater range based upon impact energy over a traditional BT of the same weight. Or increased impact energy at the same range.
Care to show your magic bullet??? Shape?
 
My 30 Cal bullets are only stable with a 1:8 twist so I'm shooting them from a 300 Blackout with really great results. They are marginally stable from a .308 Win and the wobble shows up as group spreading.

Both bullets leave the barrel at the same muzzle velocity (depending upon the powder load) but my bullets have such lower drag that they bleed off the energy much slower. I'm getting about 40% greater range based upon impact energy over a traditional BT of the same weight. Or increased impact energy at the same range.
Wait a minute, your bullet is stable in a 300 blackout but not in a 308? Why is this? Bullet stability has zero to do with case except for volume to ensure you can launch it fast enough. You are comparing apples to oranges here

Also, you will still need the g1 or g7 bc of your bullets because that is what the current ballistics calculators use, like it or not
 
Happy Hellire,
You, as a certified scientist and doctorate, should know this target doesn’t mean sh*t without some frame of reference. What bullet? Mv? Distance shot at? Conditions?
This target is laughable if shot at 100 or 200 yards, I would not be please with this target at those distances at all. But reference and a legend are key here. You wouldn’t include a picture or graph in your doctoral thesis without references, notes, legend, and true measured data. No offense intended (which clearly means I’m about to offend you) but, you are definitely losing credibility with this thread and how you are approaching the audience here. Perhaps we can rewind the clock and start over with a different approach.
Good luck sir,
Dave
 
My 30 Cal bullets are only stable with a 1:8 twist so I'm shooting them from a 300 Blackout with really great results. They are marginally stable from a .308 Win and the wobble shows up as group spreading.

Both bullets leave the barrel at the same muzzle velocity (depending upon the powder load) but my bullets have such lower drag that they bleed off the energy much slower. I'm getting about 40% greater range based upon impact energy over a traditional BT of the same weight. Or increased impact energy at the same range.
The first sentence tells that your “magic bullet” is not a solution to a problem but a problem needing a solution. The vast majority of 30 caliber barrels out in the world are 10 twist at fastest. Sure, custom barrels are available but it certainly limits the market for your product.
 
Is this the design Hellfire is talking about??? Why is he being so cryptic in not posting the info himself??
Dave
Yes, he linked (kinda sorta) his website in his original post. I think he's being at least slightly subtle so he's not seen as blatantly advertising his product.

I myself don't mind his posting the bullets and info. Nice to see different ideas come around.

 
The first sentence tells that your “magic bullet” is not a solution to a problem but a problem needing a solution. The vast majority of 30 caliber barrels out in the world are 10 twist at fastest. Sure, custom barrels are available but it certainly limits the market for your product.
Yep, that's why I focused on the 6.5 Creedmoor for long distance. I'd really like to see what some of y'all can do with that design.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,843
Messages
2,204,294
Members
79,157
Latest member
Bud1029
Back
Top