I started using the wet method with Molly back when Whidden did my first .243 barrel. Only reason I did was the .243 obviously works very well for him, he said it is a system so I followed everything in his system. Now along with the .243 I was bored so I molly'd every other cartridge I shot (.223, .260, .280, and .308). I still shoot Molly, the water method is easy to do and I do a bunch up at the time. Barrel life is excellent but then I also use cool powders. The only cartrdige I don't molly anymore is the .223 as I wasn't getting the velocity in the palma gun that I wanted and anything above 25gr of Varget/N140 was a PITA to load. Now that I'm shooting N135 I thought about trying it again as there is plenty of case room. Do I really need to molly the others no, they aren't going the 3,300fps the 243 is, but I still do as I don't notice the copper fouling as quickly as I do when naked.
The difference between molly and HBN was when you compare it to a naked bullet the velocity with molly goes down but with HBN it went up. So right there tells me HBN increases pressure or at least it was how I was applying it (NECO method with shot). The other comparison is on .243 barrels. The .243 was originally barreled with a HART barrel (Dad's decision and I inherited the rifle) with 107SMKs HBN coated and IMR4530 by 900+ rounds I couldn't touch the lands anymore. I'm on my 3rd .243 barrel since going to N160 and Molly. Now N160 is WAY cooler but I get around 2,500 rounds per barrel and the second barrel is at 2,624 and last match it shot a 200-12x at 1000 but I pulled it cause I knew it was close. Need to put it back on and see when it goes. Now part of the round difference was n160 as IMR4350 is a freaking blowtorch, but also a lot was the HBN being an abrasive it just ate away at the lead in the chamber.