• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Introducing the New 6.5mm 130gr AR Hybrid OTM Tactical Bullet

Corey Schwanz

Site $$ Sponsor
We are thrilled to announce that our recent tests were successful and our new 6.5mm 130gr AR Hybrid OTM Tactical bullet will soon be released to the public.

For the past few years the Berger Bullets team has had to put all new product projects on hold due to overwhelming demand for our existing product lines exceeding our production capacity. The 6.5mm 130gr Match AR Hybrid OTM Tactical bullet was one such project. Tooling was made for this new design just before the industry surge took place in late 2012.

Finally, thanks to new machinery coming online and the industry surge beginning to calm down, we are able to release designs that have been in the works for several years now. This is the first of many new designs that will be introduced in the coming years.

Our Chief Ballistician, Bryan Litz, has written the following article detailing the thought process behind the design of this brand new bullet.


Behind the Design

Intelligent bullet design and selection begins with an understanding of application constraints. For bullets that will be used in unlimited rifles, there are few constraints and performance can truly be maximized. However, many shooting applications have realistic constraints such as magazine feeding of loaded rounds. In constrained applications, you need to ask the question: “What’s the best bullet that will work within the constraints of my shooting application?”

The new Berger 6.5mm 130 grain AR Hybrid OTM Tactical bullet is specifically optimized for maximum performance in magazine length ammo.

6.5mm cartridges are the second most common cartridges used by top shooters in many of the Precision Rifle Series (PRS) matches, with 6mm being the most common. These kinds of tactical matches all have stages that require repeating rifles either AR-10 platforms or bolt guns, so magazine feeding is a must. Recognizing that Berger did not have an option that was truly optimized for this particular application, we went to work and the latest 6.5mm Hybrid is the result.

Berger 264 Caliber 130 Grain AR Hybrid OTM Tactical

What makes this bullet optimal for magazine length ammo? To start with, the nose of the bullet is constrained in length so that when it’s loaded to mag length in 6.5mm cartridges such as the 6.5mm Creedmoor, 260 Remington and 6.5×47 Lapua, the nose of the bullet won’t be pushed below the case mouth. This can be an issue with some of the heavier 6.5mm bullets like the 140’s. Furthermore, the hybrid ogive design is not sensitive to jump distance like some other designs such as the VLD.

Another consideration of length constrained ammo is how much of the bullet is pushed down into the case. The inside of the case is for powder, and the more space you take up with bullet, the less powder you can fit in. Less powder means less total energy available, and muzzle velocity is depressed. A bullet weight of 130 grains is an optimal balance between external ballistic performance (BC) and internal case capacity considerations which translate into muzzle velocity. Further to this objective, the AR Hybrid has a minimal air gap in the front of the nose, which allows the bullet to have an even shorter OAL. When dealing with length constrained designs, you need to pack as much bullet into as little length as possible to optimize overall performance. Another advantage of making the bullet shorter is that stability, including transonic stability is improved.

Although this design is length constrained, the combination of a hybrid ogive and 7 degree Boat Tail produce a very respectable G7 form factor of 0.920 which is within 1% of the popular 6mm 105 grain Hybrid. See below for full live fire ballistic performance data.

65 130 AR Hybrid Ballistic Performance

The 6.5mm 130 grain AR Hybrid will be barely stable from a 1:9” twist, and reaches full stability from a 1:8” twist which is common for many 6.5mm rifles. Visit the Berger Bullets twist rate calculator to get more detailed stability information on your specific barrel twist, muzzle velocity and environment.

Cartridge Selection for Magazine Length Constraint – Advanced Analysis

The trend to smaller calibers in magazine fed rifles is happening for a very good reason. For a .308 Winchester round, you only have 2.37 calibers of nose length available for the bullet to protrude from the case. Such a short nose will have relatively high drag for the caliber. By contrast, smaller calibers such as 6.5mm and 6mm have proportionally more length available for the nose to protrude from the case and still fit in the same COAL constraint. 65 130 AR Hybrid Cartridge ComparisonProportionally longer noses mean lower drag. Proportionally longer bullets mean higher sectional density. Combine an elevated sectional density with lower drag, and you get higher BC bullets. For example, consider a 175 grain .30 caliber bullet commonly used in .308 Winchester; M118LR type ammo. These 175 grain bullets have G7 BC’s in the neighborhood of .243 to .260. Neck the .308 down to 6.5mm (260 Remington) or 6mm (.243 Winchester) and now look at the BC’s of the bullets available in these calibers which work within the same magazine length constraint. The 6.5mm 130 grain AR Hybrid has a G7 BC of 0.290, and the 6mm 105 grain Hybrid has a G7 BC of 0.278; both of which are higher than the .30 cal 175 grain bullet. Furthermore, you get hundreds of feet per second more velocity with the necked down cartridges as well.

All of the above translates into higher hit percentage. See the caliber comparison chart below* which is an excerpt taken from the book: Modern Advancements in Long Range Shooting which addresses this and many other topics in even more detail.

65 130 AR Hybrid OTM Tactical Hit Percentage Comparison

*The Weapon Employment Zone (WEZ) analysis shown above is for a 1000 yard shot on a standard IPSC silhouette in an uncertain environment having: +/- 2 mph wind, +/- 1 yard range, Muzzle Velocity SD of 10 fps, and a rifle shooting 1 MOA groups.

In Summary

The new Berger 6.5mm 130 grain AR Hybrid OTM Tactical bullet is specifically optimized for use in loaded ammo with COAL constraints for magazine feeding. This bullet maximizes overall performance through BC as well as achievable muzzle velocity in mid-capacity 6.5mm cartridges fed from AR length magazines.

To view the Blog Article with all photos and graphics, click here: http://www.bergerbullets.com/new-65-130gr-ar-hybrid-otm-tactical/

Keep an eye out for more announcements on when this bullet will be available for purchase.
 

Attachments

  • Berger 264 Caliber 130 Grain AR Hybrid OTM Tactical.jpg
    Berger 264 Caliber 130 Grain AR Hybrid OTM Tactical.jpg
    57.5 KB · Views: 95
  • 65 130 AR Hybrid Ballistic Performance.jpg
    65 130 AR Hybrid Ballistic Performance.jpg
    80.3 KB · Views: 110
  • 65 130 AR Hybrid Cartridge Comparison.jpg
    65 130 AR Hybrid Cartridge Comparison.jpg
    12.4 KB · Views: 113
  • 65 130 AR Hybrid OTM Tactical Hit Percentage Comparison.jpg
    65 130 AR Hybrid OTM Tactical Hit Percentage Comparison.jpg
    89.7 KB · Views: 115
Got the email yesterday. I've been looking forward for these too hit the market. While I love my VLD's I want something a little more jump tolerant.
 
I would like to try these. I am waiting for my atlas tactical

Left hand action to arrive. I am going to build a 6.5 x 47 lapua.
 
Greaat!
o.png
 
The new Hornady reloading manual has loads using Superformance powder in 6.5 Creedmore, none listed for 260 Remington. Has anyone worked up 260R loads using the 6.5CM data for Superformance powder?
 
This is actually exciting to have such a great choice in design and mass weight. Looking forward to trying them out Corey.
 
I understand the rationale for this bullet for those shooting rifles that have magazines with limited space but I guess the question is for those shooting AI-based rifles with magazines that can accommodate rounds of extended length, is there specific advantage of using this bullet over the Berger 140 hybrid.
 
jlow,
I guess it would depend on if the seating depth for the 140 would exceed the AI magazine dimension. Having never had the pleasure to actually shoot or study this rifle I don't know if that is even possible or not. Just throwing it out there. A "back up" to the 140 or 130 VLD. I am sure there may be more.
 
jlow said:
I understand the rationale for this bullet for those shooting rifles that have magazines with limited space but I guess the question is for those shooting AI-based rifles with magazines that can accommodate rounds of extended length, is there specific advantage of using this bullet over the Berger 140 hybrid.

Can you load the 140 to AI mag length and have the boat tail above the neck shoulder junction or is the bullet down in the case? The 130 may increase your powder capacity.
 
Thanks Phil! The AI mags are very generous and have internal length of about 2.98”, so with your 140 Hybrids, touch length in my AI AT is only 2.92” and I find a jump of 25 thousands works best for me so OAL is not an issue. G7 BC is 0.317 vs. 0.290 so not exactly a contender. The only reason I can think of is if donuts gets to be a problem for me but so far so good in that department for me - I'll keep my fingers crossed.
 
jlow,
I think in a 6.5CM or 6.5x47L, the 140's work great, and fitting in a mag is not an issue. I run a TRG-22 in 260, and the 140's were either too long for my mag (max mag is 2.95") or seated too deep in the case. The 130's are a perfect fit! I have done some preliminary load testing with H4350 and got them up to 3000 fps with no pressure signs. If I can SAFELY maintain these velocities, I think the ballistics will be pretty close (maybe better?) than the 140.

I also have some highly Top Secret powder on the way which may add another 150 fps, with a lower pressure. Results to be determined!
 
bsumoba said:
NICE!

now if they only were to release the heavy 7mm bullet now ::)

I'm glad you said it and not me. ;) I have been hearing about the new 7mm bullit for a couple of years. Never heard a peep about this one.

But ...then again..I don't get out much!!
 
FTRinPA said:
jlow,
I think in a 6.5CM or 6.5x47L, the 140's work great, and fitting in a mag is not an issue. I run a TRG-22 in 260, and the 140's were either too long for my mag (max mag is 2.95") or seated too deep in the case. The 130's are a perfect fit! I have done some preliminary load testing with H4350 and got them up to 3000 fps with no pressure signs. If I can SAFELY maintain these velocities, I think the ballistics will be pretty close (maybe better?) than the 140.

I also have some highly Top Secret powder on the way which may add another 150 fps, with a lower pressure. Results to be determined!
Hi FTRinPA – when you say they were too long for your mag, how long were you seating them?

Kind of hard to imagine at 3000 fps your BC would be better than the 140 Hybrid (say compared to mine at 2,850 fps). I mean looking at the table listed in the OP for the 130, the increase in BC from 3000-2500 fps to above 3000 is only 1 in G7 BC and the difference in average G7 for the two is 0.317 vs. 0.290, that is 27...?

The 130s are shorter to fit in the mag and that in turn cause the significant decrease in G7 BC, I don't see anyway around that?
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
166,347
Messages
2,217,017
Members
79,565
Latest member
kwcabin3
Back
Top