In this day and age, I would think the science and data is established regarding carbon removal for center fire rifle cleaning. That's not to say that there won't always be a controversy regarding cleaning especially with the advent of bore scopes but the availability of high-quality solvents on the market today should put some damper of this issue. The following discussion pertains to CARBON removal issues only.
In my humble opinion, if you simply use performance results (i.e., shots on target) as a measure of the effectiveness of your cleaning procedure then you shouldn't have to anguish over which is the "best" solvent / procedure.
For example, for probably 30 years I used Shooter's Choice with a bronze brush and was completely satisfied with the results on paper. Prior to that in my early days of shooting in the 60 and early 70's, I used Hoppe's No, 9** like everyone else I knew.
The only reason I switched about 3 years ago from Shooter's Choice was because the odor became offensive to a family member. So, after some research, I switched to Bore Tech C4, carbon remover plus a bronze brush which is odorless and supposedly non-toxic.
Did my rifles shoot better or worse? No. The only thing that improved was I got rid of the offensive odor but at a cost of a higher price for my cleaning solvent. I will say, the patches come out significantly blacker with C4, but I haven't noticed any change in on paper.
**Quite honestly, I didn't experience any difference on paper between old Hoppe's 9 and Shooter's Choice. But like a lot of young shooters, I read gun magazines in those days which "warned" that Hoppe's alone was inadequate because it didn't remove copper. So, as a "herd" animal, I switched to Shooter's Choice, a supposedly "dual purpose" cleaner which contains ammonia thus the "necessary" copper remover additive. However, I didn't experience any change in performance but stuck with Shooter's Choice, "just in case". After all, why did I know, I'm just a precision varmint hunter not an "expert".