Sorry for any confusion, By STD I meant Standard Deviations in velocity. As for STD's, my only involvement in that area has been in the diagnosis and treatment of those ailments and their sequelae.
cheers!
Same! ER/Urgent care
Sorry for any confusion, By STD I meant Standard Deviations in velocity. As for STD's, my only involvement in that area has been in the diagnosis and treatment of those ailments and their sequelae.
cheers!
internal medicineSame! ER/Urgent care
How can a load with a large ES not lead to a large vertical dispersion?Es does not correlate to accuracy untill it gets real bad. We do not use ES or SD in our tuning for sr br, lr br, or F class. I have seen tons of vertical groups with good es. Especially at 600, dont worry about es if its under 30. 30s not good but it wont hurt you at 600. Es is a tuning thing so long as your loading is good. You can tune for small es or small groups. Some times they line up. Most times they dont.
Indeed!So, if ES and Sd, are no indication of tight groups, what's the point in dumping $600 into a Garmin? Something to play with?
Theres obviously many reasons to know your velocity. And many still believe that ES has a role in accuracy. However if you shoot a lot of groups on paper at long range you will eventually see that the ES does not correlate to the best groups. In fact most of the time the real small ES groups will be vertical. Its just not a good tool to use. However it can be for diagnosing problems. Like a flier. If it correlates to a odd velocity then that gives you an idea of how to fix it. Before the orange box came out a lot of use would not bother to setup a chrony while tuning, many still dont. It just doesnt matter.So, if ES and Sd, are no indication of tight groups, what's the point in dumping $600 into a Garmin? Something to play with?
You got that rightEquipment and tuned loads are of course important. But if you plan to shoot an animal at those distances, I submit that the limiting factor will be your ability to make a shot in the vital area under field conditions, not off a bench.
I see it all the time, guys spending hours on the bench trying to squeeze a few .1's in load development and never practice or determine their realistic capability to hit the vital area in a simulated field shooting position.
It might be sobering to do some testing by placing a target representing the vital area at varying distances and shooting 3 shots at each distance to the maximum distance you intend to take a shot in the same manner you will shoot in the field.
This is the difference between target shooting and hunting.
Thanks . I am aware of that. I have shot competively for decades in what we call up here service rifle matches until our government decided civilians were not to be trusted with AR-15s.these matches consist of position shooting(prone, kneeling, offhand, with some moving targets) with narrow time windows, I also do alot of bush plinking, shooting small boulders at various distances with my hunting rifles. I have always hunted with factory ammo focusing my reloading on 308 and 223 ammo for matches. In retirement i have branched out to loading for my hunting rifles. I have found this to be a much more complex proposition.For my match rifles I settled on Lapua brass/Berger Juggernaught bullet and Fed Match primers/and Varget powder for 308 and a similar set up in 223. With hunting rifles I find it a much bigger challenge. The rifles are much lighter, thinner barrels and at their best not as accurate as my match rifles in my hands. Bullet choice makes it even more challenging, ballistic coefficients vs bullet construction. Grizzly bears are a major consideration where i hunt (2 confirmed grizzly attacks in my province in the last 2 weeks!) so a stout bullet with 1.5MOA accuracy trumps a non"premium " bullet with 0.5 MOA accuracy. Load development costs also weigh on my decisions. I buy my match bullets in boxes of 500, sometimes several boxes at a time. This retired old fart sure as heck cannot buy Nosler Accubonds, Swift AFrame, or North Fork bullets in such quantities.That is why i want to get to the most accurate load with the fewest rounds fired as possible. So any tricks/tips or insights from experience are greatly appreciated.Equipment and tuned loads are of course important. But if you plan to shoot an animal at those distances, I submit that the limiting factor will be your ability to make a shot in the vital area under field conditions, not off a bench.
I see it all the time, guys spending hours on the bench trying to squeeze a few .1's in load development and never practice or determine their realistic capability to hit the vital area in a simulated field shooting position.
It might be sobering to do some testing by placing a target representing the vital area at varying distances and shooting 3 shots at each distance to the maximum distance you intend to take a shot in the same manner you will shoot in the field.
This is the difference between target shooting and hunting
Sounds like you are on the right track. As you know, as a hunter, shot placement and bullet construction is the key to success for hunters.Thanks . I am aware of that. I have shot competively for decades in what we call up here service rifle matches until our government decided civilians were not to be trusted with AR-15s.these matches consist of position shooting(prone, kneeling, offhand, with some moving targets) with narrow time windows, I also do alot of bush plinking, shooting small boulders at various distances with my hunting rifles. I have always hunted with factory ammo focusing my reloading on 308 and 223 ammo for matches. In retirement i have branched out to loading for my hunting rifles. I have found this to be a much more complex proposition.For my match rifles I settled on Lapua brass/Berger Juggernaught bullet and Fed Match primers/and Varget powder for 308 and a similar set up in 223. With hunting rifles I find it a much bigger challenge. The rifles are much lighter, thinner barrels and at their best not as accurate as my match rifles in my hands. Bullet choice makes it even more challenging, ballistic coefficients vs bullet construction. Grizzly bears are a major consideration where i hunt (2 confirmed grizzly attacks in my province in the last 2 weeks!) so a stout bullet with 1.5MOA accuracy trumps a non"premium " bullet with 0.5 MOA accuracy. Load development costs also weigh on my decisions. I buy my match bullets in boxes of 500, sometimes several boxes at a time. This retired old fart sure as heck cannot buy Nosler Accubonds, Swift AFrame, or North Fork bullets in such quantities.That is why i want to get to the most accurate load with the fewest rounds fired as possible. So any tricks/tips or insights from experience are greatly appreciated.
I always ask guys what size group do you shoot standing at 100 yards after hiking for an hour.Equipment and tuned loads are of course important. But if you plan to shoot an animal at those distances, I submit that the limiting factor will be your ability to make a shot in the vital area under field conditions, not off a bench.
I see it all the time, guys spending hours on the bench trying to squeeze a few .1's in load development and never practice or determine their realistic capability to hit the vital area in a simulated field shooting position.
It might be sobering to do some testing by placing a target representing the vital area at varying distances and shooting 3 shots at each distance to the maximum distance you intend to take a shot in the same manner you will shoot in the field.
This is the difference between target shooting and hunting.
Or if they have their heart medications handy especially if hiking for an hour in the "big woods" of north central PA.I always ask guys what size group do you shoot standing at 100 yards after hiking for an hour.
Why would any one do that ?I always ask guys what size group do you shoot standing at 100 yards after hiking for an hour.
I use one or two shots per increment during powder testing at one point of aim to identifySo any tricks/tips or insights from experience are greatly appreciated.