DngBat7
Silver $$ Contributor
So I am about to drop some money on brass. I asked one of the prominent members on the forum that I trust about Lapua or Peterson brass. Said I will not go wrong either way. So here is my quandary. If you had to choose
6.5cm brass
1. Lapua outstanding reputation and quality. Very consistent. Small rifle primer (longer lasting pockets)
2. Peterson fat neck brass. Uses large rifle primers, (pockets may not last as long). Wanted to turn down necks for trial and experimenting because I’m newer to this.
My neck chamber is .296 I believe. The fat neck brass is about .016 neck wall which makes the total loaded with bullet .296 which means I can turn down .001 or .002. and play with having a tighter chamber. I do realize that loose chambers are accurate as well.
It’s a toss up I guess small rifle primer with smaller flash hole for large, and having a tight neck or not. But I do wonder how a thick neck wall translates to pressure and tension issues. I really would love to hear all different opinions. This is still very much a learning process for me and enjoy listening to you all
Thanks!
6.5cm brass
1. Lapua outstanding reputation and quality. Very consistent. Small rifle primer (longer lasting pockets)
2. Peterson fat neck brass. Uses large rifle primers, (pockets may not last as long). Wanted to turn down necks for trial and experimenting because I’m newer to this.
My neck chamber is .296 I believe. The fat neck brass is about .016 neck wall which makes the total loaded with bullet .296 which means I can turn down .001 or .002. and play with having a tighter chamber. I do realize that loose chambers are accurate as well.
It’s a toss up I guess small rifle primer with smaller flash hole for large, and having a tight neck or not. But I do wonder how a thick neck wall translates to pressure and tension issues. I really would love to hear all different opinions. This is still very much a learning process for me and enjoy listening to you all
Thanks!