• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

IDOD/AutoDOD - Neck Turning Marvel?

Jager

Gold $$ Contributor
“Case neck thickness congruency is unparralled (sp) when compared to any other neck turning system!”


The cost was utterly breathtaking. Two and a half grand is an awful lot of money for most of us.

But the promise it offered was tantalizing. Take the one handloading process which many of us find tedious and boring and lamentable and turn it into something almost akin to fun. And end up with a level of consistency and repeatability that bettered anything we had ever done before.

Was there, maybe, a competitive advantage hidden in that very steep entry fee?

I’m talking, of course, about F-Class Products’ innovative IDOD/AutoDOD neck-turning machine.

https://fclassproducts.com/autodod

Precision riflecraft is both a disease and a rabbit hole. It pulls you in, wallet first. I eventually caved, firing off an order to the good folks at @Bryan Blake 's shop. Two months later the large, heavy box showed up.

First impressions were beyond positive. We’ve all received countless packages, of course. This one was, for me, the first time that the packaging itself was an engineering marvel in and of itself. Long before you got to what was inside.

I shoot lots of different rifles. Lots of different calibers. But I’m primarily a short-range benchrest score shooter. And so although I envisioned using Bryan’s new invention in several different applications, my first and foremost use for it was to turn .30 BR brass.

No one makes .30 BR brass, of course. You have to form it yourself. I make mine out of virgin 6 BR brass. Usually Lapua. Sometimes Peterson.

Did I mention that I hate neck-turning?

I’ve been using a PMA tool (both Model A and Model B) and a hand drill. Works great. But fast that manual process is not.

One of the things I discovered some time ago with my manual neck-turn process is that although that process is both easy and straightforward, when I later took a ball micrometer and carefully measured neck wall thickness I could see a very slight difference between turning sessions. Cases turned today, despite using the exact same tools and the exact same process, would inevitably average out very slightly different to those turned a month ago. The difference was tiny, and almost certainly would never show up in results downrange. But I was taking no chances. I limited myself to turning relatively small batches – usually 50, no more than 100 cases – at a time, then kept each batch segregated.

It wasn’t lost on me that the IDOD – if I included the CNC-like AutoDOD option - would change all that.

There’s not an awful lot of information out there on the IDOD. But the handful of YouTube videos that are out there are fairly illuminating. And the color, printed-on-paper owner’s manual that ships with the machine is quite well done.

Once you cut through the newness of the machine, its initial sense of complexity disappears. Its concept of operation is pretty straightforward: A movable, in-and-out cutting head on one end; and a fixed collet on the other end to hold the piece of brass being turned.

The platform holding the cutting head can be moved back-and-forth perpendicularly to its normal in-and-out direction, in very tiny increments monitored with an attached dial gauge, and that’s how you adjust how much brass is being removed from the inside of the case neck. And the cutting head is itself adjusted, again in very tiny increments, to control how much brass is being removed from the outside of the case neck.

The AutoDOD option is like a mini-CNC, totally automating the speed and duration in which a cut is made. And since it’s the tiny variations in speed and duration that we introduce when turning necks by hand, the AutoDOD promises to have each case come out exactly, precisely the same.

The whole design is quite ingenious.

Getting things dialed in – the precise amount you want cut off the inside and the precise amount you want cut on the outside - is a little bit fiddly. And you’ll probably need to sacrifice a few pieces of brass. But that’s mostly a one-time thing. Unless you change caliber or headstamp or decide to change your neck thickness dimension, subsequent neck turning sessions should be pretty effortless.

Alas.

I won’t belabor the hours I spent trying one setup after another. Or the dozens and dozens of virgin Lapua – and, later, Peterson - 6 BR brass (formed into .30 BR) that were destroyed. What I ended up with, every single time, was gross variance in neck thickness.

In sample after sample, I would take a piece of .30 BR brass, formed out of virgin 6 BR, with negligible runout and with minimal case neck thickness variation, and after sending it through the IDOD/AutoDOD that neck thickness variation – the difference between the thickest and thinnest portions of the neck – would blow up. It wasn’t remotely concentric.

I kept persisting in my efforts, destroying more and more brass, because I felt surely it must be me doing something wrong. I re-did my setup from scratch easily half a dozen times.

Finally, after a long interval, I reached out to the good folks at F-Class Products. I received a prompt and pleasant reply with the suggestion that I purchase their new .330 Neck Full-Length Sizing Die (https://fclassproducts.com/purchase/p_3218469/30br-330nk-full-length-resizing-die), along with a .317 mandrel. Bryan recently came out with a video (
) in which he describes how the significant distortion created in forming .30 BR brass needs to be addressed by first over expanding the neck, and then sizing it back down using their precise new .330 neck die.

I had mixed feeling upon hearing this. On the one hand, the need for this new die and this new process suggested that I wasn’t alone in struggling to make the IDOD/AutoDOD work. On the other hand, that new die was itself $215, plus the cost of an oversize mandrel. More concerning than even that, though, was the premise for why this new .330 neck FL-Sizing die was necessary in the first place: brass was being heavily distorted when formed from 6 BR to .30 BR and thus needed to be “fixed.” My measurements told me otherwise.

In the end, though, it was a no-brainer. Having already invested nearly $3,000 in the IDOD/AutoDOD, a machine which had yet to turn a single usable case, I figured if another few hundred dollars was enough to get it working I’d be happy to pay it.

Having ordered the magic die, and with my query to F-Class Products on where I might obtain the odd-size .317 mandrel having gone unanswered, I looked around and found a 32-caliber .322 carbide expander mandrel from Brownell’s (https://www.brownells.com/reloading...ning/carbide-expander-mandrels/?sku=749014471) which I figured would work. With shipping that was another sixty-one bucks.

Throughout this whole, long saga with the IDOD/AutoDOD I had taken countless micrometer measurements, trying to figure out what was going on. With the new die and the new expander mandrel on the way, I decided to run as controlled a test as I possibly could.

From my diminishing supply of virgin 6 BR brass, I formed a couple dozen .30 BR cases. Half Lapua, half Peterson. From these newly-formed cases, I selected six random samples of Lapua and six random samples of Peterson.

I labeled each of these twelve pieces of brass with a unique identifier, using a sharpie. Three of the Lapua samples would be turned on the IDOD/AutoDOD; and three would be turned with my manual neck-turning process, using a PMA Model B and a hand drill.

Likewise for the six samples of Peterson.

My intent was to carefully measure each piece of brass through its entire lifecycle, from virgin 6 BR, straight out of the box, to fully formed and neck-turned .30 BR.

The rest of the brass I had formed would be used on the IDOD/AutoDOD, in advance of the six cases being tracked, in order to make sure its setup was as optimized as I could make it.

Here are the results of all those tests, first with the IDOD/AutoDOD-turned samples, followed by the manually neck-turned samples:


IDOD_AutoDOD_Lapua.png


IDOD_AutoDOD_Peterson.png


Manual_Neck_Turn_Lapua.png


Manual_Neck_Turn_Peterson.png



My first observation is that Bryan’s contention that forming .30 BR brass creates a heavily distorted case appears questionable. With negligible case runout and minimal neck thickness variation, it certainly seems to me that these formed cases are well controlled. For the record, the process I use for forming .30 BR cases is essentially the same as Wes demonstrates here (
), the only differences being that I wet-tumble (rather than dry-tumble) after turning; and I run mine through a FL Sizing die when done.

My second observation is that the extra step of over expanding the case neck using, in my case, the .322 expander mandrel, and then squeezing it back down to size using Blake’s new .330 Neck FL-Sizing die, didn’t really do much. It didn’t materially make things better. Nor did it make them meaningfully worse. Cases were in good shape before they went through that process. And they remained in good shape afterwards.

It's when those cases go through the IDOD/AutoDOD that things go off the rails, with concentricity literally coming apart at the seams. Case neck thickness variation explodes. None of those cases are remotely usable.

In contrast, the cases turned manually, using a PMA Model B and a hand drill, are fine.

A word about measurements. Getting accurate measurements with a micrometer can be a thing, of course, especially as the level of precision increases. To keep this test as grounded as possible, I used a micrometer stand for all measurements, carefully positioning the depth of measurement – how deep into the neck – exactly the same for each reading. After the first reading on each sample, I rotated the case just a tiny amount, took another reading, rotated another tiny amount… and so on, until I had rotated through and measured the entire circumference of the case neck. Typically ten to twelve measurements for each. And noting both the smallest dimension and the largest dimension.

To say that this was tedious and time consuming is an understatement. But since concentricity – dead precise case neck thickness – lies at the very heart of what the IDOD/AutoDOD promises to provide, and since that’s the very thing I wasn’t getting, I felt it important to spend that time and make that effort.

Curiously, in the handful of YouTube videos out there that showcase the IDOD/AutoDOD, Bryan’s included, I’ve not seen anyone do that. What you see instead is guys hurriedly taking a spot reading or two and, I guess, assuming that what they measured must hold for the entire circumference of the neck.

When I sent these results to F-Class Products, with a polite query if there was anything else I could try, I was met with silence.

I’d be happy to be told I’m an idiot. That I obviously don’t know how to form .30 BR brass. Or clearly I’m a klutz with a micrometer. Something. Anything. But nope. Just silence.

I think the kids call it ghosted, these days.

Our shooting world is blessed with many one-man shops and small, family-owned businesses. The products and services we receive from those many small outfits brings much richness to our sport. I wish Bryan and his team nothing but the best. I genuinely mean that.

But I’m left with the inevitable conclusion that the IDOD/AutoDOD simply doesn’t work on .30 BR brass. Maybe it does with other calibers. Probably it does. Hopefully it does. But after destroying well over a hundred virgin 6 BR cases in the attempt, I think I’m done.

And much as posting this pains me, it pains me even more to think of the next guy down the line making the same mistake I did.

Three grand is a lot of money.
 
Benchrite Case Lathe for Neck Turning
I spent a little extra coin on this setup some years ago and it has never missed a beat. I was not attempting to speed up the operation, just make it a more pleasurable experience.....Which it did.

I started out with a different unit that held the brass with the same system as the one reviewed here. It came with a piece to help "tap" the brass back out of the holder. After using it for a bit, that just didn't sit well with me...........Thanks for your very informative wright up...

Regards
Rick
 
“Case neck thickness congruency is unparralled (sp) when compared to any other neck turning system!”


The cost was utterly breathtaking. Two and a half grand is an awful lot of money for most of us.

But the promise it offered was tantalizing. Take the one handloading process which many of us find tedious and boring and lamentable and turn it into something almost akin to fun. And end up with a level of consistency and repeatability that bettered anything we had ever done before.

Was there, maybe, a competitive advantage hidden in that very steep entry fee?

I’m talking, of course, about F-Class Products’ innovative IDOD/AutoDOD neck-turning machine.

https://fclassproducts.com/autodod

Precision riflecraft is both a disease and a rabbit hole. It pulls you in, wallet first. I eventually caved, firing off an order to the good folks at @Bryan Blake 's shop. Two months later the large, heavy box showed up.

First impressions were beyond positive. We’ve all received countless packages, of course. This one was, for me, the first time that the packaging itself was an engineering marvel in and of itself. Long before you got to what was inside.

I shoot lots of different rifles. Lots of different calibers. But I’m primarily a short-range benchrest score shooter. And so although I envisioned using Bryan’s new invention in several different applications, my first and foremost use for it was to turn .30 BR brass.

No one makes .30 BR brass, of course. You have to form it yourself. I make mine out of virgin 6 BR brass. Usually Lapua. Sometimes Peterson.

Did I mention that I hate neck-turning?

I’ve been using a PMA tool (both Model A and Model B) and a hand drill. Works great. But fast that manual process is not.

One of the things I discovered some time ago with my manual neck-turn process is that although that process is both easy and straightforward, when I later took a ball micrometer and carefully measured neck wall thickness I could see a very slight difference between turning sessions. Cases turned today, despite using the exact same tools and the exact same process, would inevitably average out very slightly different to those turned a month ago. The difference was tiny, and almost certainly would never show up in results downrange. But I was taking no chances. I limited myself to turning relatively small batches – usually 50, no more than 100 cases – at a time, then kept each batch segregated.

It wasn’t lost on me that the IDOD – if I included the CNC-like AutoDOD option - would change all that.

There’s not an awful lot of information out there on the IDOD. But the handful of YouTube videos that are out there are fairly illuminating. And the color, printed-on-paper owner’s manual that ships with the machine is quite well done.

Once you cut through the newness of the machine, its initial sense of complexity disappears. Its concept of operation is pretty straightforward: A movable, in-and-out cutting head on one end; and a fixed collet on the other end to hold the piece of brass being turned.

The platform holding the cutting head can be moved back-and-forth perpendicularly to its normal in-and-out direction, in very tiny increments monitored with an attached dial gauge, and that’s how you adjust how much brass is being removed from the inside of the case neck. And the cutting head is itself adjusted, again in very tiny increments, to control how much brass is being removed from the outside of the case neck.

The AutoDOD option is like a mini-CNC, totally automating the speed and duration in which a cut is made. And since it’s the tiny variations in speed and duration that we introduce when turning necks by hand, the AutoDOD promises to have each case come out exactly, precisely the same.

The whole design is quite ingenious.

Getting things dialed in – the precise amount you want cut off the inside and the precise amount you want cut on the outside - is a little bit fiddly. And you’ll probably need to sacrifice a few pieces of brass. But that’s mostly a one-time thing. Unless you change caliber or headstamp or decide to change your neck thickness dimension, subsequent neck turning sessions should be pretty effortless.

Alas.

I won’t belabor the hours I spent trying one setup after another. Or the dozens and dozens of virgin Lapua – and, later, Peterson - 6 BR brass (formed into .30 BR) that were destroyed. What I ended up with, every single time, was gross variance in neck thickness.

In sample after sample, I would take a piece of .30 BR brass, formed out of virgin 6 BR, with negligible runout and with minimal case neck thickness variation, and after sending it through the IDOD/AutoDOD that neck thickness variation – the difference between the thickest and thinnest portions of the neck – would blow up. It wasn’t remotely concentric.

I kept persisting in my efforts, destroying more and more brass, because I felt surely it must be me doing something wrong. I re-did my setup from scratch easily half a dozen times.

Finally, after a long interval, I reached out to the good folks at F-Class Products. I received a prompt and pleasant reply with the suggestion that I purchase their new .330 Neck Full-Length Sizing Die (https://fclassproducts.com/purchase/p_3218469/30br-330nk-full-length-resizing-die), along with a .317 mandrel. Bryan recently came out with a video (
) in which he describes how the significant distortion created in forming .30 BR brass needs to be addressed by first over expanding the neck, and then sizing it back down using their precise new .330 neck die.

I had mixed feeling upon hearing this. On the one hand, the need for this new die and this new process suggested that I wasn’t alone in struggling to make the IDOD/AutoDOD work. On the other hand, that new die was itself $215, plus the cost of an oversize mandrel. More concerning than even that, though, was the premise for why this new .330 neck FL-Sizing die was necessary in the first place: brass was being heavily distorted when formed from 6 BR to .30 BR and thus needed to be “fixed.” My measurements told me otherwise.

In the end, though, it was a no-brainer. Having already invested nearly $3,000 in the IDOD/AutoDOD, a machine which had yet to turn a single usable case, I figured if another few hundred dollars was enough to get it working I’d be happy to pay it.

Having ordered the magic die, and with my query to F-Class Products on where I might obtain the odd-size .317 mandrel having gone unanswered, I looked around and found a 32-caliber .322 carbide expander mandrel from Brownell’s (https://www.brownells.com/reloading...ning/carbide-expander-mandrels/?sku=749014471) which I figured would work. With shipping that was another sixty-one bucks.

Throughout this whole, long saga with the IDOD/AutoDOD I had taken countless micrometer measurements, trying to figure out what was going on. With the new die and the new expander mandrel on the way, I decided to run as controlled a test as I possibly could.

From my diminishing supply of virgin 6 BR brass, I formed a couple dozen .30 BR cases. Half Lapua, half Peterson. From these newly-formed cases, I selected six random samples of Lapua and six random samples of Peterson.

I labeled each of these twelve pieces of brass with a unique identifier, using a sharpie. Three of the Lapua samples would be turned on the IDOD/AutoDOD; and three would be turned with my manual neck-turning process, using a PMA Model B and a hand drill.

Likewise for the six samples of Peterson.

My intent was to carefully measure each piece of brass through its entire lifecycle, from virgin 6 BR, straight out of the box, to fully formed and neck-turned .30 BR.

The rest of the brass I had formed would be used on the IDOD/AutoDOD, in advance of the six cases being tracked, in order to make sure its setup was as optimized as I could make it.

Here are the results of all those tests, first with the IDOD/AutoDOD-turned samples, followed by the manually neck-turned samples:


View attachment 1493671


View attachment 1493672


View attachment 1493673


View attachment 1493674



My first observation is that Bryan’s contention that forming .30 BR brass creates a heavily distorted case appears questionable. With negligible case runout and minimal neck thickness variation, it certainly seems to me that these formed cases are well controlled. For the record, the process I use for forming .30 BR cases is essentially the same as Wes demonstrates here (
), the only differences being that I wet-tumble (rather than dry-tumble) after turning; and I run mine through a FL Sizing die when done.

My second observation is that the extra step of over expanding the case neck using, in my case, the .322 expander mandrel, and then squeezing it back down to size using Blake’s new .330 Neck FL-Sizing die, didn’t really do much. It didn’t materially make things better. Nor did it make them meaningfully worse. Cases were in good shape before they went through that process. And they remained in good shape afterwards.

It's when those cases go through the IDOD/AutoDOD that things go off the rails, with concentricity literally coming apart at the seams. Case neck thickness variation explodes. None of those cases are remotely usable.

In contrast, the cases turned manually, using a PMA Model B and a hand drill, are fine.

A word about measurements. Getting accurate measurements with a micrometer can be a thing, of course, especially as the level of precision increases. To keep this test as grounded as possible, I used a micrometer stand for all measurements, carefully positioning the depth of measurement – how deep into the neck – exactly the same for each reading. After the first reading on each sample, I rotated the case just a tiny amount, took another reading, rotated another tiny amount… and so on, until I had rotated through and measured the entire circumference of the case neck. Typically ten to twelve measurements for each. And noting both the smallest dimension and the largest dimension.

To say that this was tedious and time consuming is an understatement. But since concentricity – dead precise case neck thickness – lies at the very heart of what the IDOD/AutoDOD promises to provide, and since that’s the very thing I wasn’t getting, I felt it important to spend that time and make that effort.

Curiously, in the handful of YouTube videos out there that showcase the IDOD/AutoDOD, Bryan’s included, I’ve not seen anyone do that. What you see instead is guys hurriedly taking a spot reading or two and, I guess, assuming that what they measured must hold for the entire circumference of the neck.

When I sent these results to F-Class Products, with a polite query if there was anything else I could try, I was met with silence.

I’d be happy to be told I’m an idiot. That I obviously don’t know how to form .30 BR brass. Or clearly I’m a klutz with a micrometer. Something. Anything. But nope. Just silence.

I think the kids call it ghosted, these days.

Our shooting world is blessed with many one-man shops and small, family-owned businesses. The products and services we receive from those many small outfits brings much richness to our sport. I wish Bryan and his team nothing but the best. I genuinely mean that.

But I’m left with the inevitable conclusion that the IDOD/AutoDOD simply doesn’t work on .30 BR brass. Maybe it does with other calibers. Probably it does. Hopefully it does. But after destroying well over a hundred virgin 6 BR cases in the attempt, I think I’m done.

And much as posting this pains me, it pains me even more to think of the next guy down the line making the same mistake I did.

Three grand is a lot of money.
Thanks for this thorough review.

The 21st Century lathe works quite well.
 
I can't speak to an idod as I've never seen one, let alone used one, but for reference:

I know forming brass is another animal, but here's some context for new cases I thought might be helpful.

I have measured 100 cases of Lapua .308 and Norma 6XC in the same way - multiple points around the case neck with a micrometer. Unturned, straight out of the box, variation on a single case was less than .001 for the 100. One or two might have been about .001. That was true of both batches.

Like you, i have never had any issues forming .30BR from 6BR just by necking up and turning by hand.
 
Last edited:
I have done everything you have done and have found exactly the same things to be true in my experience. I have invested in multiple case holders for multiple calibers and have run into the same issues every time. The problem is caused by many things, any one of which or all combined get you to the same place, the run-out of the spinning neck exceeds the amount of available brass you can remove before it will clean up. I too, did everything to make the brass concentric including fire-forming it first before turning, all to no avail. Finally, I took perfectly concentric brass, meticulously selected, placed it into the autodod and then measured the run-out of the neck while slowly spinning the autodod by hand. What I found was 2-3 thousands of run-out indicating that the case neck was not spinning true, but was "orbiting" in an eliptical pattern. This would cause uneven cutting of the neck. No matter how perfectly concentric it was when it started, the run-out in the case holder/machine makes turning a case neck to within even 3-4 ten thousands an impossibility. If you are ok with a variance in neck wall thickness of .0004 or even more, then this machine is awesome. If you need precision to less than .0002 or less, you will need to hand turn using the mandrel method keep the neck from orbiting out of round when it is spinning.
 
I've had issues as well. I have much better results over expanding the necks then sizing with a non bushing die. The brass I did screw up I shot, then necks were straight to my chamber, then turned. Bryan's 2 videos on YouTube about 30BR and sizing were in response to my troubles.
 
I have no faith in any turning system that does not fully float the cutter.
Also, I think you should turn the necks as new 6br, then size up to 30cal.
It's trial & error with a couple culled cases to do it, and end up right, but I calculate the thickness change with neck sizing to get very close right off the bat.
 

Attachments

“Case neck thickness congruency is unparralled (sp) when compared to any other neck turning system!”


The cost was utterly breathtaking. Two and a half grand is an awful lot of money for most of us.

But the promise it offered was tantalizing. Take the one handloading process which many of us find tedious and boring and lamentable and turn it into something almost akin to fun. And end up with a level of consistency and repeatability that bettered anything we had ever done before.

Was there, maybe, a competitive advantage hidden in that very steep entry fee?

I’m talking, of course, about F-Class Products’ innovative IDOD/AutoDOD neck-turning machine.

https://fclassproducts.com/autodod

Precision riflecraft is both a disease and a rabbit hole. It pulls you in, wallet first. I eventually caved, firing off an order to the good folks at @Bryan Blake 's shop. Two months later the large, heavy box showed up.

First impressions were beyond positive. We’ve all received countless packages, of course. This one was, for me, the first time that the packaging itself was an engineering marvel in and of itself. Long before you got to what was inside.

I shoot lots of different rifles. Lots of different calibers. But I’m primarily a short-range benchrest score shooter. And so although I envisioned using Bryan’s new invention in several different applications, my first and foremost use for it was to turn .30 BR brass.

No one makes .30 BR brass, of course. You have to form it yourself. I make mine out of virgin 6 BR brass. Usually Lapua. Sometimes Peterson.

Did I mention that I hate neck-turning?

I’ve been using a PMA tool (both Model A and Model B) and a hand drill. Works great. But fast that manual process is not.

One of the things I discovered some time ago with my manual neck-turn process is that although that process is both easy and straightforward, when I later took a ball micrometer and carefully measured neck wall thickness I could see a very slight difference between turning sessions. Cases turned today, despite using the exact same tools and the exact same process, would inevitably average out very slightly different to those turned a month ago. The difference was tiny, and almost certainly would never show up in results downrange. But I was taking no chances. I limited myself to turning relatively small batches – usually 50, no more than 100 cases – at a time, then kept each batch segregated.

It wasn’t lost on me that the IDOD – if I included the CNC-like AutoDOD option - would change all that.

There’s not an awful lot of information out there on the IDOD. But the handful of YouTube videos that are out there are fairly illuminating. And the color, printed-on-paper owner’s manual that ships with the machine is quite well done.

Once you cut through the newness of the machine, its initial sense of complexity disappears. Its concept of operation is pretty straightforward: A movable, in-and-out cutting head on one end; and a fixed collet on the other end to hold the piece of brass being turned.

The platform holding the cutting head can be moved back-and-forth perpendicularly to its normal in-and-out direction, in very tiny increments monitored with an attached dial gauge, and that’s how you adjust how much brass is being removed from the inside of the case neck. And the cutting head is itself adjusted, again in very tiny increments, to control how much brass is being removed from the outside of the case neck.

The AutoDOD option is like a mini-CNC, totally automating the speed and duration in which a cut is made. And since it’s the tiny variations in speed and duration that we introduce when turning necks by hand, the AutoDOD promises to have each case come out exactly, precisely the same.

The whole design is quite ingenious.

Getting things dialed in – the precise amount you want cut off the inside and the precise amount you want cut on the outside - is a little bit fiddly. And you’ll probably need to sacrifice a few pieces of brass. But that’s mostly a one-time thing. Unless you change caliber or headstamp or decide to change your neck thickness dimension, subsequent neck turning sessions should be pretty effortless.

Alas.

I won’t belabor the hours I spent trying one setup after another. Or the dozens and dozens of virgin Lapua – and, later, Peterson - 6 BR brass (formed into .30 BR) that were destroyed. What I ended up with, every single time, was gross variance in neck thickness.

In sample after sample, I would take a piece of .30 BR brass, formed out of virgin 6 BR, with negligible runout and with minimal case neck thickness variation, and after sending it through the IDOD/AutoDOD that neck thickness variation – the difference between the thickest and thinnest portions of the neck – would blow up. It wasn’t remotely concentric.

I kept persisting in my efforts, destroying more and more brass, because I felt surely it must be me doing something wrong. I re-did my setup from scratch easily half a dozen times.

Finally, after a long interval, I reached out to the good folks at F-Class Products. I received a prompt and pleasant reply with the suggestion that I purchase their new .330 Neck Full-Length Sizing Die (https://fclassproducts.com/purchase/p_3218469/30br-330nk-full-length-resizing-die), along with a .317 mandrel. Bryan recently came out with a video (
) in which he describes how the significant distortion created in forming .30 BR brass needs to be addressed by first over expanding the neck, and then sizing it back down using their precise new .330 neck die.

I had mixed feeling upon hearing this. On the one hand, the need for this new die and this new process suggested that I wasn’t alone in struggling to make the IDOD/AutoDOD work. On the other hand, that new die was itself $215, plus the cost of an oversize mandrel. More concerning than even that, though, was the premise for why this new .330 neck FL-Sizing die was necessary in the first place: brass was being heavily distorted when formed from 6 BR to .30 BR and thus needed to be “fixed.” My measurements told me otherwise.

In the end, though, it was a no-brainer. Having already invested nearly $3,000 in the IDOD/AutoDOD, a machine which had yet to turn a single usable case, I figured if another few hundred dollars was enough to get it working I’d be happy to pay it.

Having ordered the magic die, and with my query to F-Class Products on where I might obtain the odd-size .317 mandrel having gone unanswered, I looked around and found a 32-caliber .322 carbide expander mandrel from Brownell’s (https://www.brownells.com/reloading...ning/carbide-expander-mandrels/?sku=749014471) which I figured would work. With shipping that was another sixty-one bucks.

Throughout this whole, long saga with the IDOD/AutoDOD I had taken countless micrometer measurements, trying to figure out what was going on. With the new die and the new expander mandrel on the way, I decided to run as controlled a test as I possibly could.

From my diminishing supply of virgin 6 BR brass, I formed a couple dozen .30 BR cases. Half Lapua, half Peterson. From these newly-formed cases, I selected six random samples of Lapua and six random samples of Peterson.

I labeled each of these twelve pieces of brass with a unique identifier, using a sharpie. Three of the Lapua samples would be turned on the IDOD/AutoDOD; and three would be turned with my manual neck-turning process, using a PMA Model B and a hand drill.

Likewise for the six samples of Peterson.

My intent was to carefully measure each piece of brass through its entire lifecycle, from virgin 6 BR, straight out of the box, to fully formed and neck-turned .30 BR.

The rest of the brass I had formed would be used on the IDOD/AutoDOD, in advance of the six cases being tracked, in order to make sure its setup was as optimized as I could make it.

Here are the results of all those tests, first with the IDOD/AutoDOD-turned samples, followed by the manually neck-turned samples:


View attachment 1493671


View attachment 1493672


View attachment 1493673


View attachment 1493674



My first observation is that Bryan’s contention that forming .30 BR brass creates a heavily distorted case appears questionable. With negligible case runout and minimal neck thickness variation, it certainly seems to me that these formed cases are well controlled. For the record, the process I use for forming .30 BR cases is essentially the same as Wes demonstrates here (
), the only differences being that I wet-tumble (rather than dry-tumble) after turning; and I run mine through a FL Sizing die when done.

My second observation is that the extra step of over expanding the case neck using, in my case, the .322 expander mandrel, and then squeezing it back down to size using Blake’s new .330 Neck FL-Sizing die, didn’t really do much. It didn’t materially make things better. Nor did it make them meaningfully worse. Cases were in good shape before they went through that process. And they remained in good shape afterwards.

It's when those cases go through the IDOD/AutoDOD that things go off the rails, with concentricity literally coming apart at the seams. Case neck thickness variation explodes. None of those cases are remotely usable.

In contrast, the cases turned manually, using a PMA Model B and a hand drill, are fine.

A word about measurements. Getting accurate measurements with a micrometer can be a thing, of course, especially as the level of precision increases. To keep this test as grounded as possible, I used a micrometer stand for all measurements, carefully positioning the depth of measurement – how deep into the neck – exactly the same for each reading. After the first reading on each sample, I rotated the case just a tiny amount, took another reading, rotated another tiny amount… and so on, until I had rotated through and measured the entire circumference of the case neck. Typically ten to twelve measurements for each. And noting both the smallest dimension and the largest dimension.

To say that this was tedious and time consuming is an understatement. But since concentricity – dead precise case neck thickness – lies at the very heart of what the IDOD/AutoDOD promises to provide, and since that’s the very thing I wasn’t getting, I felt it important to spend that time and make that effort.

Curiously, in the handful of YouTube videos out there that showcase the IDOD/AutoDOD, Bryan’s included, I’ve not seen anyone do that. What you see instead is guys hurriedly taking a spot reading or two and, I guess, assuming that what they measured must hold for the entire circumference of the neck.

When I sent these results to F-Class Products, with a polite query if there was anything else I could try, I was met with silence.

I’d be happy to be told I’m an idiot. That I obviously don’t know how to form .30 BR brass. Or clearly I’m a klutz with a micrometer. Something. Anything. But nope. Just silence.

I think the kids call it ghosted, these days.

Our shooting world is blessed with many one-man shops and small, family-owned businesses. The products and services we receive from those many small outfits brings much richness to our sport. I wish Bryan and his team nothing but the best. I genuinely mean that.

But I’m left with the inevitable conclusion that the IDOD/AutoDOD simply doesn’t work on .30 BR brass. Maybe it does with other calibers. Probably it does. Hopefully it does. But after destroying well over a hundred virgin 6 BR cases in the attempt, I think I’m done.

And much as posting this pains me, it pains me even more to think of the next guy down the line making the same mistake I did.

Three grand is a lot of money.
Normally when I see a post or a reply this long I cruise right on by…. But I gotta say I read your whole post and it’s undoubtedly the best review I’ve ever read period the end!… I spend money hand over fist in this game but three grand is a lot of coin for just one step of or process!…. With that being said I talked to Wang243 a fellow forum member who also bought one and I almost bought one of these myself!…. Like you I use a PMA and I’m very happy with the results I get. I can’t even imagine how frustrated ,furious and let down you have been over this whole expensive
Process!…. But was totally impressed with your professionalism in your post without out one cuss word or a single badmouthing of the outfit you purchased all this equipment from!… you sir are a inspiration!… I wish you the best
Wayne
 
Thanks, guys.

Had a really nice chat with Katie from F-Class Products a little bit ago. She says they'll make it right one way or another. Bryan is off hunting with his boy for a few days - best of luck to them. She'll discuss this with him when he gets back.

We'll see if there's anything to be done.
 
Thanks, guys.

Had a really nice chat with Katie from F-Class Products a little bit ago. She says they'll make it right one way or another. Bryan is off hunting with his boy for a few days - best of luck to them. She'll discuss this with him when he gets back.

We'll see if there's anything to be done.
They have always been helpful to me. I struggle a lot. They always sort me out
 
@Jager, if I am reading your spreadsheets correctly, it looks like you are trying to take .0005" off of your expanded necks.

Here is what I learned about my AutoDoD. I shoot .284 and 7-6.5 PRC. Once expanded to 7mm and fire formed, my case necks are just under .015" on average. As thin as .0143" thick on some parts of the neck and as tick as .0152" on other parts of the same neck. The runout of my brass after firing w/o sizing is between .0015 and .002 measured in the AutoDod case holder and carefully turning the collet holder.

I want may case necks to be .0135". That is taking an average of .0015" off. See the problem? My runout is equal to the amount of brass I want to take off.

So, one solution is to change reamers to one with a tighter neck that will allow me to take more brass off case neck. Instead of a .316 reamer/chamber neck diameter, I am going to switch and experiment with a .315 or .314 and turn my necks down to .0125 taking .0025" to .003" which is greater than the runout.

The AutoDoD is quite an investment and if it doesn't work in your current system you have to decide if it is worth it to change upstream processes or components to experience the expected benefit.

You put together a vary readable and respectable review. I know it will help a lot of folks considering ways to speed up or reduce some of the tedium in parts of the process. Well done, Sir; well done!

Hank
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,048
Messages
2,188,847
Members
78,660
Latest member
bld127
Back
Top