I’m quite sure once the voting has been tabulated in the online voting ,someone in the leadership will explain the pros and cons.I said “ to follow”. Paper ballots preceded online voting
Last edited:
I’m quite sure once the voting has been tabulated in the online voting ,someone in the leadership will explain the pros and cons.I said “ to follow”. Paper ballots preceded online voting
The vote results are in and will be announced after the conference call tonight. The online voting will allow the 1 year trial period as required in the bylaws and in the fall there will be a paper ballot mailed out to vote on the officers that are up for election this year and the agenda items that passed this years electronic vote. If they are voted in by paper ballot they will become permanent at that time.I’m quite sure once the voting has been tabulated in the online voting ,someone in the leadership will explain the pros and cons.
I want to thank you so much for clarifying this question keep up the good work.The vote results are in and will be announced after the conference call tonight. The online voting will allow the 1 year trial period as required in the bylaws and in the fall there will be a paper ballot mailed out to vote on the officers that are up for election this year and the agenda items that passed this years electronic vote. If they are voted in by paper ballot they will become permanent at that time.
I was under the impression that online voting had been passed by IBS. It was passed in like...2011 or so by an attending group at the annual meeting. I'm sorry Jim, but why is a paper ballot needed at all? In all seriousness, I hope you don't say "election fraud". Why else, please? It would seem that online voting gives a far wider chance for members to vote, either way, on a rule change or even officers, than paper ballots. This, IMO, should be final but I'm curious as to why it isn't. When I think about it more, this paper ballot thing only allows time to organize a movement against what the actual membership voted for and passed. I'm being hopeful for an answer that covers these potential issues. Remember, I WAS an IBS member and I might have had something to do with the online voting rule being passed. I've been around a while now, so I've seen the way things USE to be and I'm hopeful that they are improved. I hope that they truly are and that there is a good reason why online membership voting isn't enough.The vote results are in and will be announced after the conference call tonight. The online voting will allow the 1 year trial period as required in the bylaws and in the fall there will be a paper ballot mailed out to vote on the officers that are up for election this year and the agenda items that passed this years electronic vote. If they are voted in by paper ballot they will become permanent at that time.
Is my question "off limits" or is it just being ignored...for some other reason? I had to address the real issue a bit more discretely to get to the goal of online voting the last time. I was hoping that we could all be more forthright about it this time. This needs to be cleared publicly. It really shouldn't be a big deal at all.I was under the impression that online voting had been passed by IBS. It was passed in like...2011 or so by an attending group at the annual meeting. I'm sorry Jim, but why is a paper ballot needed at all? In all seriousness, I hope you don't say "election fraud". Why else, please? It would seem that online voting gives a far wider chance for members to vote, either way, on a rule change or even officers, than paper ballots. This, IMO, should be final but I'm curious as to why it isn't. When I think about it more, this paper ballot thing only allows time to organize a movement against what the actual membership voted for and passed. I'm being hopeful for an answer that covers these potential issues. Remember, I WAS an IBS member and I might have had something to do with the online voting rule being passed. I've been around a while now, so I've seen the way things USE to be and I'm hopeful that they are improved. I hope that they truly are and that there is a good reason why online membership voting isn't enough.
My opinion probably don’t mean much but that’s the very reason why we need a paper ballot to validate everyone’s intent I strongly believe a paper ballot with a signature is solid on what the shooters want.I was under the impression that online voting had been passed by IBS. It was passed in like...2011 or so by an attending group at the annual meeting. I'm sorry Jim, but why is a paper ballot needed at all? In all seriousness, I hope you don't say "election fraud". Why else, please? It would seem that online voting gives a far wider chance for members to vote, either way, on a rule change or even officers, than paper ballots. This, IMO, should be final but I'm curious as to why it isn't. When I think about it more, this paper ballot thing only allows time to organize a movement against what the actual membership voted for and passed. I'm being hopeful for an answer that covers these potential issues. Remember, I WAS an IBS member and I might have had something to do with the online voting rule being passed. I've been around a while now, so I've seen the way things USE to be and I'm hopeful that they are improved. I hope that they truly are and that there is a good reason why online membership voting isn't enough.
Why?My opinion probably don’t mean much but that’s the very reason why we need a paper ballot to validate everyone’s intent I strongly believe a paper ballot with a signature is solid on what the shooters want.
I will only say one thing stay tuned.Why?
Are you afraid of Chinese or Russian election interference in IBS voting? One other reason, please. Online only gives every member a voice. Why does there need to be a re-affirmation of members by paper ballot?
Oh, I'm tuned and watching! I truly hope it turns around from how it is presented. I'm pro ibs and pro shooting, in general. I love br and all I want is the best for it..period.I will only say one thing stay tuned.
So far you are the only one complaining and you aren't even a member. Just join and go through the process to change the rules to online voting. They are probably going by the way the rules are written. Mr. Clines phone # has been posted on here many times .Why?
Are you afraid of Chinese or Russian election interference in IBS voting? One other reason, please. Online only gives every member a voice. Why does there need to be a re-affirmation of members by paper ballot?
It does David. Thank you for answering my question.Ok hope this helps everyone understand . Before online voting a agenda Item was voted on by members that attended the Annual Meeting. Sometime 20 sometimes 100. The online voting is only for agenda items that where presented. For the annual meeting for a one year trail if they pass the online vote.
The paper vote is the vote that says yes we tried them for a year and to officially add the to the rule book. The paper ballots process hasn't changex just the Annual meeting votes on agendia item and committees.
Hope this helps
David
Results will be posted on the IBS webpage tommorrow.
4. Proxy voting on Temporary Rules: At the time the ballots for election of IBS Executive Officers are mailed to the membership, the temporary rules are to be forwarded with said ballot. These temporary 1 Amended from “July” at the January 2012 IBS Annual Meeting. IBS By-Laws January 2012 4 rules will include a recommendation (for or against) based on the investigation of the proper committee. The membership shall, at the time of receiving their ballot, vote for or against making each temporary rule permanent.I was under the impression that online voting had been passed by IBS. It was passed in like...2011 or so by an attending group at the annual meeting. I'm sorry Jim, but why is a paper ballot needed at all? In all seriousness, I hope you don't say "election fraud". Why else, please? It would seem that online voting gives a far wider chance for members to vote, either way, on a rule change or even officers, than paper ballots. This, IMO, should be final but I'm curious as to why it isn't. When I think about it more, this paper ballot thing only allows time to organize a movement against what the actual membership voted for and passed. I'm being hopeful for an answer that covers these potential issues. Remember, I WAS an IBS member and I might have had something to do with the online voting rule being passed. I've been around a while now, so I've seen the way things USE to be and I'm hopeful that they are improved. I hope that they truly are and that there is a good reason why online membership voting isn't enough.
Hi Jim! I'll call ya shortly. Thank you for the reply.4. Proxy voting on Temporary Rules: At the time the ballots for election of IBS Executive Officers are mailed to the membership, the temporary rules are to be forwarded with said ballot. These temporary 1 Amended from “July” at the January 2012 IBS Annual Meeting. IBS By-Laws January 2012 4 rules will include a recommendation (for or against) based on the investigation of the proper committee. The membership shall, at the time of receiving their ballot, vote for or against making each temporary rule permanent.
MIke,
I hope you understand elected officials have a set of guidelines that have to be followed. In the IBS it is our By-laws and they CLEARLY say exactly the process that HAS to be followed. As and elected officer of this organization, It's my duty to make sure they are followed 100%. If you or any OTHER IBS member are not happy with this process, you can change it by goint through an agenda item/by-law change. If you would like to know how that is done, please don't hesitate to call me and I will happily explain it. Thanks JC
I think that the great, great, great majority of people in the sport of benchrest are outstanding individuals, that I'm proud to call many of, my friends. But yes, cheating does rarely happen, even here.there's so much cheating that it makes me sick... grow up and shoot and if you can't beat the next guy then too bad
