relictrader said:
Robert I have for a long time wanted one of your rifles but each time I here that your's is better and why?
Is it because the 6.5 shortneck case to small?
Is it because your Hagar experiment didn't work?
Is it because you have spent lot's time an money to build something better,but John and Carl keep winning?
OR IS IT THAT THE HAGAR CASE with a few extra grains of powder is ideal for it's AR15 magazine feed frame?
Relictrader
Let's just set the record straight here - - -
The HAGAR has the exact same case capacity as the 6mm Turbo 40 cartridge and only .5 gr water capacity more than a 6mmAR Turbo.
I think if you go back and look at the 3x600 match where Carl and I were squaded together and shot last year at New Holland, PA, me with a 6mmAR Turbo and he with his 6mm HAGAR, you will see that your assumption that Carl with the HAGAR bested me with the 6mmAR Turbo is just not correct. Does that mean the HAGAR is not as good as the 6mmAR line of cartridges because I beat Carl in every match we shot our AR's head to head? - No.
Carl's a great shooter, I know him personally and have great respect for him. I also know and do some business with John and I have great respect for him too.
Speaking of magazine feeding out of an AR-15, when's the last time you mag fed 105-108 gr bullets out of a HAGAR at 300 yards? Probably never because the case is too long to do that, yet we do it all the time with the 6mmAR line of cartridges. On a windy day that's a clear advantage at 300 yards, as is Lapua small primer brass we have that does not require a whole lot of work and forming.
As a side note, on this issue of the HAGAR winning all the time, the last time I counted there are at least 12 national high power shooting records that were set with the 6mmAR, but at this point I know of only one set with the HAGAR,and that was never officially recorded). Does that mean the 6mmAR is better - no. Like Bob said, the HAGAR is a viable cartridge, but it's just one of the choices.
Let the facts speak!
Robert Whitley