Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Looks like I need a 7 for full stability.Run the numbers yourself here:
https://bergerbullets.com/twist-rate-calculator/
It will give you a better feel for the minimum twist rate necessary at your specific elevation and atmospheric conditions. OAL for the 88s is ~1.240" and the average G7 BC in my hands is ~0.300.
Apparently the Berger stability calculator isn't reliable. Just ran the numbers for the 80 ELD at the 3550 fps I'm running it in an 8 twist barrel. Says marginal stability. I've run them out to 1100 yards and couldn't ask for better accuracy. 100-1100 yards and it's true as Any bullet I've shot to that range. Guess I'll buy some 88s and see what happens.Looks like I need a 7 for full stability.
I think that the polymer tip has something to do with the stability errors. Some programs allow for the length of the polymer tip. I have a 7.5 twist 22-250 Ackley and have been wondering if the 88 gr ELDM would stabilize also. I shoot 80 gr amazes currently with RL 23 and get good accuracy at 600 yards.Apparently the Berger stability calculator isn't reliable. Just ran the numbers for the 80 ELD at the 3550 fps I'm running it in an 8 twist barrel. Says marginal stability. I've run them out to 1100 yards and couldn't ask for better accuracy. 100-1100 yards and it's true as Any bullet I've shot to that range. Guess I'll buy some 88s and see what happens.
Ill try the 88s and see what happens. The 80s are fine. I've shot 90 SMKs also and got great groups(3") to 500 yards. Not excellent but good. The 80s are around 2" at 500.Yep - the polymer tip might be a contributing factor. Also, it's possible to spin bullets at an Sg of around 1.4 (rather than Sg >/= 1.5) and have them perform extremely well, even if you might be giving up a small amount of the intrinsic BC by slightly under-spinning them. With the 88s, I would go with the slowest twist rate you can get away with that will still net you most of the intrinsic BC at your specific elevation/atmospheric conditions. That way, the possibility of jacket failure is reduced, but you still have a setup that performs well.
That's exactly what happens. Losing BC isn't the end of the world as long as accuracy is good. I'm pretty happy with 2" groups at 500 yards. 760 yards and groups on open up to 3". It's still a Lazer at those longest ranges. Can't complain. Just would like to see how the 88s do. My opinion is they won't do as well. I'm content with the 80s but like all of us, just have to find out.If you talk to the Tech guys from the different bullet manufacturers they'll all tell you the same thing, you can be shy on barrel twist and the bullet will still shoot fine, you just won't get the maximum BC of the bullet.
That's exactly what happens. Losing BC isn't the end of the world as long as accuracy is good. I'm pretty happy with 2" groups at 500 yards. 760 yards and groups on open up to 3". It's still a Lazer at those longest ranges. Can't complain. Just would like to see how the 88s do. My opinion is they won't do as well. I'm content with the 80s but like all of us, just have to find out.
Appreciate it. I will definitely post my results. I really don't think 88s will stabilize in my 8 twist but time will tell. Not giving up much with the 80s tho if the 88s don't run well.I haven't tried the 80s yet, but I was very, very pleased with the dimensional consistency of the two Lots of 88s I have, the BC was markedly higher than advertised according to my LabRadar data, and the precision was excellent. Unfortunately, my 6.8-twist barrel tears the jackets off at ~2830 fps, so they're on hold until I have another rifle re-barreled in 7-twist. You might be pleasantly surprised at the performance of the 88s. Good luck with them and let us know how they work out for you.
Unfortunately, my 6.8-twist barrel tears the jackets off at ~2830 fps, so they're on hold until I have another rifle re-barreled in 7-twist.
That'd be a hard one to leave, especially at 3650 with an 80. Don't think you'd gain enough velocity to make up the BC loss. Just my opinion. Never ran the numbers but my gut says the 80 will edge it out.Those 75gr ELD-M's have only a slightly lower BC than does the 80 ELD-M and depending on how much faster you could launch those 75's, they very well may be the best choice. A person would have to shoot some then run the numbers to see, but it wouldn't surprise me, especially in a 22-250 or 22-250AI, if those 75gr ELD-M were the hot ticket.
I'm pushing the 80gr ELD-M from my 224 Terminator at 3650 with a 28in 8tw and I may give some of those 75gr ELD-M a go myself.
I'm kind of surprised you're having bullet failure with a 6.8tw at only 2830. Unless something is wrong with your barrel, and I'm not suggesting there is, that doesn't say much for the construction of those Hornady 88's and is not only surprising they're coming apart, but concerning as well.
Have you talked to Hornady about them coming apart on you at such a slow velocity? That's a little less than 300,000 rpm and I'd think they would hold together at that rpm. I'm spinning the 80gr ELD-M almost 330,000rpm from my 28in Krieger 8tw and they aren't coming apart.
Eventually, I'd like to shoot those 88s again because except for the jacket failures, I was very pleased with how easily they tuned in and the precision they offered.
In my .223 Rem rifle with a 30" 6.8-twist barrel and 0.220" freebore, the 88s tuned in at ~2830 fps with 24.2 gr Varget/Fed205, COAL = 2.626" (~.015" off the lands). That is the exact setup from which I've had some jacket failures. However with a 7-twist barrel, you might be able to push them harder without issue. The only way to know will be to test them and see what happens. If you try run 88s in the 22BR at such a slow velocity, you will be giving up much of the advantage that cartridge brings to the table. I'd purposely try to find the upper limits in that setup so I would know how hard I could push them, and then go look for the next slower accuracy node that provided a reasonable safety margin to prevent jacket failure.
I wonder if the 30" barrel vs my 24" Barrel is in part of the reason I am not blowing jackets off yet I am running over 3000 fps. Interesting.