dmoran
Donovan Moran
I check mine sighted in at 1000 and both shooting good at 100. Larry
Well then your 15" indifference between the two is irrelevant (fubar)..... lolHere you go again no place did I say they both were ZERO'D. at 1000 Larry
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I check mine sighted in at 1000 and both shooting good at 100. Larry
Well then your 15" indifference between the two is irrelevant (fubar)..... lolHere you go again no place did I say they both were ZERO'D. at 1000 Larry
Thanks to DanSavage for actually answering the question.
Honorable mention to MarkS. You forgot to mention who makes the bullets you listed.
Also, please tell me who makes these horrifically inaccurate high BC bullets so that I can avoid them.[/QUOT
Berger's
In my post I said that I am willing give up "slight differences in accuracy". Not sure how you came to "not accurate."
If one is chasing the ultimate accuracy with a 6 BR they're not going to be shooting 100 gr + bullets anyway.
The importance of .2" of group depends on what you shoot.
I will shoot these out to 385 meters, standing! 3 or 4 inches less wind deflection at 385 meters means a whole lot more than a .2" improvement in group.
The 6BR does not reach it's ultimate accuracy, until you put something like a Berger 105 gr VLD in and shoot it at long range. I have shot 3 IBS 600yds benchrest records shooting the older Berger 105gr VLD's ( same bullet as the Berger Hunting bullets) one being light gun group 0.749" in 2007'.
At 385m you may want to look at the Berger 95gr or 87gr VLD, you can get more speed to make up for the lower BC. I can get 200 f/s faster with the 87gr, than the 105gr. Any of the Bergers will give the BC you will need at 385m. you want see the difference until you out to 600 to 1000yds.
Mark Schronce
Interesting thought. What velocities can you get with the Berger 105, 95 and 87?
Mozella -
So your saying the bullet you used to win that F/TR and BR match is not the most accurate bullet in that barrel?
My experience is, raw accuracy has the ballistic advantage, by having less dispersion built in.
Donovan
Mozella -
We all have our opinions, and will respect yours as yours.....
My experience is primarily from 1000yd competitions and +20,000 rounds down my 6Dasher barrels and +10,000 down 243-Ackley's in the years before them, that is: I have experienced and seen accuracy trump ballistics repeatedly in all conditions. And my own explanation to why is because a larger dispersion is at larger disposition to worsen over distance. That will demand ballistic supremacy in windage demanded ambient to over come the already worsening accuracy disposition. Plain and simply because worse accuracy is already starting the race from behind and already beaten until "the stars line up just right" that can offer it some high levels of supremacy at a needed point in the race in order to make up the losses.
Donovan[/QUOTE
Huh?.....can you dumb this down?
......... snip............ Don't worry about the bullets till you find a good barrel that you don't have to look at the wind flags and it will take care of you. ……. jim
I've read the above sentence several times, but I'm still not sure what you're saying. I think you mean to say that I shouldn't do load workups searching for the best bullet. Rather, before I test bullets, I should keep trying different barrels until I run across one which is somehow able to compensate for changes in the wind and one which can do that job so accurately that I need not look at the wind flags. Do I have that right or do I misunderstand what you're saying?
Sounds good. Where do I find such a barrel, how much does it cost (I'm worried that it might be expensive) and does the company offer a money back guarantee in case it can't actually read the wind?
I will shoot these out to 385 meters, standing! 3 or 4 inches less wind deflection at 385 meters means a whole lot more than a .2" improvement in group.
What was the accuracy indifference?I currently am using the 105 Hybrids
I also point them , I tested this by loading 40 rds at the same time 20 pointed 20 not, all my go to load.
The pointed Hybrids impacted between 1 and 1.2 Moa higher at 900 yards, that was enough for me to decide that it was worth it. I use a .594 BC Now.
So I guess my addition to this discussion is
I would find the most accurate bullet in my rifle, then point them for consistency and bc improvement.
