jcampbellsmith said:dixieppc said:..... I always keep my brass bumped to a point to where my bolt (with firing pin removed) will fall half way down before meeting light resistance. This way my case will always be pushed back against the bolt face but not offer enough resistance to upset the rifle on the rest when closing the bolt.
...
I read of this approach of removing the firing pin a lot. One thing puzzles me, what about the ejector plunger? Does that need to be removed too?
Thanks
JCS
CatShooter said:jcampbellsmith said:dixieppc said:..... I always keep my brass bumped to a point to where my bolt (with firing pin removed) will fall half way down before meeting light resistance. This way my case will always be pushed back against the bolt face but not offer enough resistance to upset the rifle on the rest when closing the bolt.
...
I read of this approach of removing the firing pin a lot. One thing puzzles me, what about the ejector plunger? Does that need to be removed too?
Thanks
JCS
The ejector and spring should be removed - that spring is a pushy little booger, and will keep the bolt handle from dropping of it's own weight.
22BRGUY said:Jon I believe Donovan is correct on this because in the process of bumping the shoulder, the body also needs to be resized at least somewhat or the brass would be pushed outward making the case difficult to chamber. I learned it the hard way.
CatShooter said:The ejector and spring should be removed - that spring is a pushy little booger, and will keep the bolt handle from dropping of it's own weight.
This is my experience as well. The ejector doesn't play into things for meLHSmith said:CatShooter said:The ejector and spring should be removed - that spring is a pushy little booger, and will keep the bolt handle from dropping of it's own weight.
Well I just tried that theory on some custom and factory actions , and that isn't the case, the handle drops the same whether on a properly sized case or an empty chamber with the pushy booger.
bigedp51 said:And how many brench rest shooters buy 100 cases looking for 10 to 15 perfect cases before starting their case prep work.
This is where the .001 to .002 head clearance/shoulder bump gives you a little wiggle room to eliminate any case misalignment with the bore. Meaning getting to use all 100 case you bought and not looking for the "few" perfect cases in that batch.
I'm not knocking bench rest shooters, "BUT" how many shooters here have custom made rifles with custom form fitting chambers using "perfectly selected" cases.
bigedp51 said:Mr. Boyd Allen
And judging from what Mr. Salazar and Mr. Thomas of Team Lapua USA said they do not share the partial sizing and zero head clearance of the bench rest fraternity and prefer the rat turd in the violin case method for better accuracy and reliability.
bigedp51 said:I'm not knocking bench rest shooters, "BUT" how many shooters here have custom made rifles with custom form fitting chambers using "perfectly selected" cases.
LHSmith said:[size=12pt]Your responses show you are very much misinformed about Benchrest Shooting load techniques - and we are talking Registered Match shooting, Benchrest with a capital "B".
I know of no one who shoots for zero H/S, nor anyone who sorts through a box of 100 cases to get 15 usable.
F-Class is commonly referred to as belly Benchrest because much of the equipment used- actions, barrels, optics, and rest are the same. Input from Benchrest shooters most certainly is valid to this thread.
Where did you get the idea it was Zero H/S.....you don't have closed quotes, so I don't know if that is in the book or your assumption.bigedp51 said:As you can see below the bolt face of Tony Boyer's rifle is resting on the rear of the case and the bolt is only half closed meaning "ZERO" head clearance and "ZERO" head space. :![]()
LHSmith said:Another wrong assumption , no where does the book claim this method yields zero H/S...... a fit that close (essentially a line-to line fit) would leave absolutely NO room for error and would completely destroy T.B.'s ability to "run 'em" when HIS condition comes around due to disturbing the bags. There's many vids of TB on You-tube, watch and you may learn something new.
Myself, I was taught to size till the bolt drops which is ~.002" H/S , but who can argue TB's techniques.
LHSmith said:I know of no one who shoots for zero H/S, nor anyone who sorts through a box of 100 cases to get 15 usable.
BoydAllen said:Boyer's book was written for benchrest shooters, not as a general reloading manual, and while he is the shooter that has the most hall of fame points, by a wide margin, he is not the only one that wins matches consistently. If you want to see how a lot of winning benchrest shooting is done, take a look at this video of Charles Huckaba shooting a dot at 200 yards at the Worlds Benchrest Championship in Sydney Australia. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Bjs96PsbXI
Note the smooth and speedy gun handling, and lack of disturbance of the rifle on its bags. This cannot be accomplished with ammunition that is a tight fit in the chamber. There has to be some clearance, but certainly not the rat turn in the violin case variety. The rifle's stock; the joystick front rest; super slick bag material; right bolt, left port, right eject action, to facilitate running a group when the opportunity presents it, are all current state of the art in benchrest. If one is going to make statements about how benchrest is done, it is probably a good idea to have seen some up to date examples. Successful shooters do not,by any means do everything the same, but there are some significant trends that are one might wish to be aware of.
LHSmith said:As usual you mis-quote.....again where does it claim ZERO, nadda H/S? What they describe will yield .001" H/S.
Another wrong assumption is that point blank BR competitors weigh cases...most DO NOT. Read Tony's Book and re-read if at first you don't comprehend the info. If you would actually read posts here on Accurate Shooter, you would know that almost all Long Range BENCHREST Competitors weigh and segregate cases.