Am a new QuickLoad user and also use a LabRadar.
Developed a new .308 Win. hunting load with Sierra's 180 gr. SBT bullet and found that LabRadar measured a MV that's 119 fps faster than predicted by QL after inputting bullet data, COAL, barrel length, case capacity, powder type and charge weight.
Am not complaining by any means, but am curious about the reason(s) and what input variables would need to be adjusted to get the software to predict actual results.
BTW, the ES on the last 5-shot string after getting the rifle zeroed yesterday was 11 and SD was 4.6, using a RCBS Chargemaster.
Developed a new .308 Win. hunting load with Sierra's 180 gr. SBT bullet and found that LabRadar measured a MV that's 119 fps faster than predicted by QL after inputting bullet data, COAL, barrel length, case capacity, powder type and charge weight.
Am not complaining by any means, but am curious about the reason(s) and what input variables would need to be adjusted to get the software to predict actual results.
BTW, the ES on the last 5-shot string after getting the rifle zeroed yesterday was 11 and SD was 4.6, using a RCBS Chargemaster.