I really hate given misinformation based on me being wrong, but apparently I was wrong and edited my previous post to reflect that. I really hate being wrong and not being able to determine how I come to a wrong conclusion, but I have no idea at this point how I came up with 5.25 MOA up!
I have entered, run, and re-entered three times. I think I have it correct now and it circles back to what you (
@17Hornet) stated in your very first post.
G7 .235 with a Zero Height of 0", 8.25 MOA Up
G7 .235 with a Zero Height of .325", 8.0 MOA Up
G7 .266 with a Zero Height of 0", 8.0 MOA Up
G7 .266 with a Zero height of .325", 7.75 MOA Up
NOTE 1: I did not check Hornady for the G7 BC, however AB say's it's .238 and that makes no difference in this example.
NOTE 2: When I use the custom BC from AB, it makes no difference for this short distance calculation.
I wonder if
@SKWERLZ would be kind enough to recheck his data.
So, now that my AB agrees with JBM and your initial post, I'm wondering if the difference in the calculated trajectory and what your friend experienced may have been caused with an issue around the elevation turrets?
(George thinking to himself; how could you be so damn lame to post that 5.25 MOA, what an idiot! Now slap yourself a few good ones and apologize?!?!?)