Thank you~!not eggzakly, brass will expand to chamber dimension and then shrink/spring back a little
Yes, that's a good rule of thumb but I find it's actually a little closer than that with full power loads. Gotta hit it pretty hard just to get it really formed in the neck on one firing and then...how much did the bbl swell vs how much did the brass spring back kinda thing. Just some variables that are tough to quantify that affect the end number to a fair degree. But...if calipers are the tool being used to measure with...Well....just forget I even commented.Most of the time it will show @ .001 less than actual chamber dimension.
I think there is only one normal neck chamber diameter for a no turn neck? Check a few SAAMI chamber blueprints. The manufacturer may not be legally held to that dimension. But my guess is they do.Will the neck of a fired case show the dimension of the chamber neck~?
No, not always sir. Even right now, newer Lapua brass is thicker than it was within same cartridge even. A .272 is pretty tight or maybe even too tight with some of it. I've added a thou to my newest reamers because of this.I think there is only one normal neck chamber diameter for a no turn neck? Check a few SAAMI chamber blueprints. The manufacturer may not be legally held to that dimension. But my guess is they do.
For 6mm. I thought a no turn neck was always .272".
4350 in a ppc or even a BR with 68's? How in the world did you get anywhere near a "max pressure?"The .276" unsized neck area has expanded to the necks chamber. After over 20 loadings, it no longer expands or springs back. No annealing, for the most part.
The unsized area makes it slightly harder to chamber rounds. Light drag.
Firing a 68 gr Berger with IMR 4350 will not expand necks fully with starting loads. Even at maximum pressure, spring back happens a lot on first 3 firing.
243 winchester.4350 in a ppc or even a BR with 68's? How in the world did you get anywhere near a "max pressure?"
Lol! That's my picture! Pretty interesting though, isn't it. The guy only neck sized most of the time and being a 222, the bbl lasted a really long time but I just don't remember what he told me for a round count on it. You can clearly see the step where over time, the dirty(probably), unsized portion of the neck is in the chamber. Not sure it really matters but it's an eye opener either way."A cross sectioned .222 chamber with a gazillion rounds down the barrel. Normal cleaning and nothing more. Bushing die..You can clearly see where the neck bushing stopped sizing the neck of the brass. "
http://forum.accurateshooter.com/threads/erosion-from-blowback-on-necks.3938810/page-2
View attachment 1556093
Oh, ok. That makes sense now. Thanks!243 winchester.
I'll add...while the pic looks like clear rifling left..boy, it was almost totally gone for at least a couple or three inches. Like I said, a bazillion rounds down that pipe. He never shot fast or for long at a time and really kept his stuff clean. He never got it what I'd call hot or even close to it. This sucker was just worn out. IIRC, it still shot way better than one should expect it to though when it finally gave up the ghost on him."A cross sectioned .222 chamber with a gazillion rounds down the barrel. Normal cleaning and nothing more. Bushing die..You can clearly see where the neck bushing stopped sizing the neck of the brass. "
http://forum.accurateshooter.com/threads/erosion-from-blowback-on-necks.3938810/page-2
From post #24. Photo by gunsandgunsmithing.
View attachment 1556093
Sure is. Not sure if good or bad. But my 40x factory barrel likes it that way. Thank you for posting your photo. Food for thought.Pretty interesting though, isn't it
Not really, I have a 6PPC with a .274 neck, brass comes out .273I think there is only one normal neck chamber diameter for a no turn neck? Check a few SAAMI chamber blueprints. The manufacturer may not be legally held to that dimension. But my guess is they do.
For 6mm. I thought a no turn neck was always .272".