I think most of you guys should bother to read P.O. Ackleys' books ("Handbook For Shooters and Reloaders" , a 2 volume set) instead of getting your information off of the interdnet!
Exactly
I think most of you guys should bother to read P.O. Ackleys' books ("Handbook For Shooters and Reloaders" , a 2 volume set) instead of getting your information off of the interdnet!
"Most Ackleys have excessive case stretch problems... many suffer head separations often.
And 0.007" is not enough crush to insure proper forming.
New case headspace allows 0.010" variance - so with your 0.007", a new case can still be 0.003" loose.
And, a properly formed Ackley case from a well made chamber should shrink a fair amount... 5 to 10 thou.
If your cases are not shorter when they come out, than they were when they went in, then your cases are stretching at the web."
This statement is so far from the truth. The cases will NEVER lengthen in an improved chamber, even if they ARE stretching at the web. Please explain how it can possibly stay the same or lengthen when it is the top third of the case forming to the chamber? The case would have to be short by the amount it stretched, wouldn't it? HOGWASH! How many improved chamber rifles do you own?
Have never had case stretch problems with a PROPERLY cut chamber with .005"-.008" negative headspace. I form cases from 22-250AI through to 375 Weatherby, 404 Jeffery and 338-416 Rigby Imp none stretch causing head separations. Even belted magnums that headspace on the belt, still come out .020"-.030" short in the neck. The brass has to be pulled from somewhere, and that somewhere is always the thinnest area cause it expands first to fill the chamber and seal it.
I must admit I switched to forming without bullets some time ago, but, I've done my fair share of firing factory ammo in improved chambers without a single hiccup. I still do it if I get given factory ammo somebody no longer needs in a cal I use that is improved.
![]()
I've read to use a mid level powder charge for fire forming and was curious to why?.. then I was reading by using a hot load you can stretch primer pockets during fire forming..is this so..
I read P.O. Ackley's books (cover to cover) several times and then proceeded to rechamber 7 rifles to an improved chamber. Did the work myself. Each rifle performs perfectly. Do as Mr. Ackley says and it aint rocket surgery.
Correctly chambered Ackley Improved rifles DO NOT suffer from case head separation or lengthening issues. Matter of fact, brass life should increase greatly. Anyone having such problems either owns in improperly chambered rifle or is over-working brass during resizing. And fire forming should be no more difficult than closing the bolt on a loaded round and pulling the trigger.
I disagree, you claim you chambered 7 rifles to Ackely Improved chambers without mentioning what receivers were used and then you omitted the most important detail; did the barrels have an existing chamber or were they short chambered barrels?
F. Guffey
What do you disagree with?
.Correctly chambered Ackley Improved rifle
uWith no more information's furnished in the beginning someone could get the ideal there was a "all you have to do" method and or technique. If you did not set the barrel back on the 30/06 Ruger you do not have a .
And then there is the setting the barrel back; it is possible to get two different neck diameters, the old chamber may not be cleaned up with the new Ackley reamer. By design the Ackley chamber is designed to be used with factory, over the counter, new ammo. The reason; the neck on factory 30/06 cases is shorter than the neck on the Ackley chamber. When chambered the factory neck is sized at the shoulder neck juncture, when that happens it is said the case head spaces when the neck/shoulder juncture is sized when the bolt is closed. When the chamber is cut without setting the barrel back part of the old chamber is not cleaned up with the Ackely Reamer. The part of the chamber that is not cleaned up prevents the case from being sized when the bolt is closed.
If not for the short neck on the 30 Gibbs the Gibbs would be a better option because there is no way the Gibbs reamer will not clean up the old chamber (except for generous necks).
F.Guffey_
With no more information's furnished in the beginning someone could get the ideal there was a "all you have to do" method and or technique. If you did not set the barrel back on the 30/06 Ruger you do not have a .
And then there is the setting the barrel back; it is possible to get two different neck diameters, the old chamber may not be cleaned up with the new Ackley reamer. By design the Ackley chamber is designed to be used with factory, over the counter, new ammo. The reason; the neck on factory 30/06 cases is shorter than the neck on the Ackley chamber. When chambered the factory neck is sized at the shoulder neck juncture, when that happens it is said the case head spaces when the neck/shoulder juncture is sized when the bolt is closed. When the chamber is cut without setting the barrel back part of the old chamber is not cleaned up with the Ackely Reamer. The part of the chamber that is not cleaned up prevents the case from being sized when the bolt is closed.
If not for the short neck on the 30 Gibbs the Gibbs would be a better option because there is no way the Gibbs reamer will not clean up the old chamber (except for generous necks).
F.Guffey_
Most Ackleys have excessive case stretch problems... many suffer head separations often.
And 0.007" is not enough crush to insure proper forming.
New case headspace allows 0.010" variance - so with your 0.007", a new case can still be 0.003" loose.
And, a properly formed Ackley case from a well made chamber should shrink a fair amount... 5 to 10 thou.
If your cases are not shorter when they come out, than they were when they went in, then your cases are stretching at the web.