F-Class Worlds & Nationals Equipment Listing

[spclark]

My PDF file - in it's first iteration (corrections /additions welcome) - is attached below.

(I have more data but contributors (JamesL, CSS, Petros284, Pappy83, JimG, Jamesl, Seb, Ernie) failed to give me their full names, without which I can't correlate it with the entrants list.)

My apologies for that but as I don't shoot F-Class I don't know too many of you on a name basis. Sorry for the delay too; this should have been ready weeks ago....

 

[Immike]

I suspect this list will expand for some time. Thank you for posting.

 

[B Mize]

Sorry about that.
Barry Mize

 

[spclark]

I suspect this list will expand for some time. Thank you for posting.

I suspect the same and will try to accommodate new / corrected info as time permits.

You're most welcome!

 

[jamesl]

Sorry I thought I sent it to you.
James Laney

 

[Petros284]

Sorry about the full name deal. Hope this helps!

Pete Petros

 

[spclark]

Thanks guys!

 

[RCurtis]

Quite the landslide victory for Berger Bullets!

 

[rickiesrevenge]

Ernie's last name is Bishop. Seb's last name is Lambang.

Aaron

 

[spclark]

Thanks for that info.

 

[SEB-USA]

Thank you Aaron!
Sebastian would be his full first name.

Ernie's last name is Bishop. Seb's last name is Lambang.

Aaron

 

[spclark]

I'M REQUESTING THAT MY INITIAL DOCUMENT BE REMOVED.

One of the contributors has contacted me stating their load info was in error.

I'll have a revised listing soon making note of the change and including other info that wasn't included.

As with ALL load data found anywhere on the Internet (or elsewhere, for that matter) do not automatically assume that the numbers shown will be safe in YOUR rifle with YOUR equipment.

 

[Immike]

I'M REQUESTING THAT MY INITIAL DOCUMENT BE REMOVED.

One of the contributors has contacted me stating their load info was in error.

I'll have a revised listing soon making note of the change and including other info that wasn't included.

As with ALL load data found anywhere on the Internet (or elsewhere, for that matter) do not automatically assume that the numbers shown will be safe in YOUR rifle with YOUR equipment.

Perhaps it's best to remove all of the charge data and only list the powder used.

 

[spclark]

Perhaps it's best to remove all of the charge data and only list the powder used.

Before I post a revised version I'll take comments on that.

My preference would be to include load data but with the caveat as to specific equipment used.

I think it's helpful to have charge weight info but one must exercise due caution when preparing loads for other equipment and conditions.

 

[Ken Dickerman]

Please note the original .pdf list has my long neck RSAUM charge as 62.8gr of H4350. THIS IS WRONG! It is H4831sc not H4350. I would support removing all charge weights.

 

[Steve Blair]

Please note the original .pdf list has my long neck RSAUM charge as 62.8gr of H4350. THIS IS WRONG! It is H4831sc not H4350. I would support removing all charge weights.

[br]
Wow, Ken! 62.8 grains is a really heavy charge of H4350. Are you sure that's safe?

 

[Mark Walker in TX]

Dickerman! Wow - somkin' 'em down there!!! LOL!

I didn't provide a charge for this reason, among others.

IMO, lot to lot variations of powder are just too much to even make presenting a charge meaningful... I've also personally seen a couple people just take the easy way and start right with someone else's posted loads, and proceed to blow shit up. It's not good.

Steve - you should delete all the charges.

 

[Immike]

I strongly agree that the charges are removed from the list. It's not necessary and we have too many new reloaders on this forum.

 

[Erik Cortina]

Steve - you should delete all the charges.

+1, and BTW, who is the Ken Dickerman guy anyway and why is he shooting such hot loads? ;D

 

[spclark]

OK, concensus appears to be for no charge weights.

Thanks for your comments.