CatShooter,
No, I did not intend to refer to your post at all.
I was referring to the post that pretty much said that an expander ball had to be used unless the brass was sorted and neck turned. Over the years I've found that to be inaccurate.
I use a Lyman M die to expand a few of my calibers like you do, but I use the Sinclair expander mandrel/die combo for most of them. They both accomplish mostly the same thing, except that the Sinclair setup doesn't offer the ability to slightly bell the case mouth as an option. But I'm sure that you already knew that
-
robert,
You know crappy brass when you see it! I just don't have the time to mess with it for my precision loads.
I've come to the point that I only use Lapua brass for my precision loading. Maybe I've been lucky but none of mine has significantly varying neck thicknesses between cases. But I don't weight sort either! I've found that to be a waste of time for the type of shooting that I do which is mostly F-Class, LR BR, and LR prone. Of course, I use Winchester, IMI, and LC brass for hunting and recreational loads, but my loading methods are different for those purposes.
But let me ask you, why would the use of an expander ball and bushing give you a more uniform neck tension than the use of an expander mandrel and bushing?
In any case, I'll continue to do it my way as I'm sure you'll continue to use your methods. What I intended to point out in my post was the statement that "The bushing dies should be used with expander ball if shooting brass out of the box, unsorted or not turned". In my eyes that is a blanket statement that should be qualified. Many loaders use the expander mandrel and bushing method instead of the expander ball with great results.